The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention (SSPANLI) randomized controlled trial protocol

Christy C Tomkins-Lane, Lynne M Z Lafave, Jill A Parnell, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jocelyn Rempel, Luciana G Macedo, Stephanie Moriartey, Kent J Stuber, Philip M Wilson, Richard Hu, Yvette M Andreas, Christy C Tomkins-Lane, Lynne M Z Lafave, Jill A Parnell, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jocelyn Rempel, Luciana G Macedo, Stephanie Moriartey, Kent J Stuber, Philip M Wilson, Richard Hu, Yvette M Andreas

Abstract

Background: Because of symptoms, people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are often inactive, and this sedentary behaviour implies risk for diseases including obesity. Research has identified body mass index as the most powerful predictor of function in LSS. This suggests that function may be improved by targeting weight as a modifiable factor. An e-health lifestyle intervention was developed aimed at reducing fat mass and increasing physical activity in people with LSS. The main components of this intervention include pedometer-based physical activity promotion and nutrition education.

Methods/design: The Spinal Stenosis Pedometer and Nutrition Lifestyle INTERVENTION (SSPANLI) was developed and piloted with 10 individuals. The protocol for a randomized controlled trail comparing the SSPANLI intervention to usual non-surgical care follows. One hundred six (106) overweight or obese individuals with LSS will be recruited. Baseline and follow-up testing includes dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, blood draw, 3-day food record, 7-day accelerometry, questionnaire, maximal oxygen consumption, neurological exam, balance testing and a Self-Paced Walking Test.

Intervention: During Week 1, the intervention group will receive a pedometer, and a personalized consultation with both a Dietitian and an exercise specialist. For 12 weeks participants will log on to the e-health website to access personal step goals, walking maps, nutrition videos, and motivational quotes. Participants will also have access to in-person Coffee Talk meetings every 3 weeks, and meet with the Dietitian and exercise specialist at week 6. The control group will proceed with usual care for the 12-week period. Follow-up testing will occur at Weeks 13 and 24.

Discussion: This lifestyle intervention has the potential to provide a unique, non-surgical management option for people with LSS. Through decreased fat mass and increased function, we may reduce risk for obesity, chronic diseases of inactivity, and pain. The use of e-health interventions provides an opportunity for patients to become more involved in managing their own health. Behaviour changes including increased physical activity, and improved dietary habits promote overall health and quality of life, and may decrease future health care needs in this population.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902979.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart.

References

    1. Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:796–803. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00004.
    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9:545–550. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005.
    1. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, Takiguchi N, Minamide A, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M. Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:1103–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018.
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:139–146. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198726.62514.75.
    1. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine. 1996;21:2046–2052. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199609010-00024.
    1. Tomkins-Lane CC, Conway J, Hepler C, Haig AJ. Changes in objectively measured physical activity (Performance) after epidural steroid injection for lumbar spinal stenosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):2008–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.014.
    1. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1.
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Gledhill N, Shephard RJ. The economic burden of physical inactivity in Canada. CMAJ. 2000;163:1435–1440.
    1. Ji RR, Xu ZZ, Strichartz G, Serhan CN. Emerging roles of resolvins in the resolution of inflammation and pain. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34:599–609. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.005.
    1. Nathan C, Ding A. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.029.
    1. Serhan CN, Brain SD, Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Haslett C, O’Neill LA, Perretti M, Rossi AG, Wallace JL. Resolution of inflammation: state of the art, definitions and terms. FASEB J. 2007;21:325–332. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7227rev.
    1. Facchini FS, Hua N, Abbasi F, Reaven GM. Insulin resistance as a predictor of age-related diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3574–3578. doi: 10.1210/jc.86.8.3574.
    1. Cordain L, Eades MR, Eades MD. Hyperinsulinemic diseases of civilization: more than just Syndrome X. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2003;136:95–112. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(03)00011-4.
    1. Cowey S, Hardy RW. The metabolic syndrome: a high-risk state for cancer? Am J Pathol. 2006;169:1505–1522. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.051090.
    1. Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between obesity and low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:135–154. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp356.
    1. Mantyselka P, Miettola J, Niskanen L, Kumpusalo E. Persistent pain at multiple sites–connection to glucose derangement. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;84:e30–e32. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.01.018.
    1. Mantyselka P, Miettola J, Niskanen L, Kumpusalo E. Glucose regulation and chronic pain at multiple sites. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:1235–1238. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken220.
    1. Mantyselka P, Miettola J, Niskanen L, Kumpusalo E. Chronic pain, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: a community-based study. Pain. 2008;137:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.007.
    1. Jhawar BS, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ. Cardiovascular risk factors for physician-diagnosed lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2006;6:684–691. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.016.
    1. Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis as an inflammatory disease (osteoarthritis is not osteoarthrosis!) Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.012.
    1. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, Hoyland JA, O’Brien J, Jayson MI. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet. 1997;350:178–181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02135-1.
    1. Igarashi A, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Olmarker K. Inflammatory cytokines released from the facet joint tissue in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. Spine. 2004;29:2091–2095. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000141265.55411.30. Phila Pa 1976;%.
    1. Urquhart DM, Berry P, Wluka AE, Strauss BJ, Wang Y, Proietto J, Jones G, Dixon JB, Cicuttini FM. Young investigator award winner: increased fat mass is associated with high levels of low back pain intensity and disability. Spine. 2011;36:1320–1325. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f9fb66. Phila Pa 1976;%.
    1. Shiri R, Solovieva S, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, Telama R, Yang X, Viikari J, Raitakari OT, Viikari-Juntura E. The role of obesity and physical activity in non-specific and radiating low back pain: the Young Finns study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;42:640–650. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.09.002.
    1. Leboeuf-Yde C. Body weight and low back pain: a systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies. Spine. 2000;25:226–237. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00015. Phila Pa 1976.
    1. Rubin DI. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin. 2007;25:353–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.004.
    1. Lebovits A, Hainline B, Stone LS, Seminowicz DA, Brunz JT, Rosenquist RW, Cowan P. Struck from behind: maintaining quality of life with chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2009;10:927–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.011.
    1. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Body mass index as a risk factor for developing chronic low back pain: a follow-up in the Nord-Trondelag health study. Spine. 2013;38:133–139. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182647af2. Phila Pa 1976;%.
    1. Heuch I, Heuch I, Hagen K, Zwart JA. Associations between serum lipid levels and chronic low back pain. Epidemiology. 2010;21:837–841. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f20808.
    1. Heuch I, Hagen K, Heuch I, Nygaard O, Zwart JA. The impact of body mass index on the prevalence of low back pain: the HUNT study. Spine. 2010;35:764–768. Phila Pa 1976;%.
    1. Tomkins-Lane CC, Holz SC, Yamakawa KS, Phalke VV, Quint DJ, Miner J, Haig AJ. Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:647–653. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023.
    1. Rothney MP, Apker GA, Song Y, Chen KY. Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1091–1097. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90641.2008.
    1. Rothney MP, Schaefer EV, Neumann MM, Choi L, Chen KY. Validity of physical activity intensity predictions by ActiGraph, Actical, and RT3 accelerometers. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1946–1952. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.279.
    1. McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1509–1514. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180dc9954.
    1. McClain JJ, Craig CL, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers under free-living conditions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:753–761. doi: 10.1139/H07-060.
    1. Corder K, Brage S, Ekelund U. Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007;10:597–603. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328285d883.
    1. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2000;25:2940–2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
    1. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in general populations. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Pelletier LG, Dion SC, Slovenic-D’Angelo M, Reid R. Why do you regulate what you eat? relationship between forms of regulation, eating behaviors, sustained dietary behavior change, and psychological adjustment. Motiv Emot. 2004;48:245–277.
    1. Markland D, Tobin V. A modification of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2004;26:191–196.
    1. Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Loitz CC, Scime G. “It’s Who I Am…Really!” The importance of integrated regulation in exercise contexts. Journal of Applied Biobehavioural Research. 2006;11:79–104.
    1. Sullivan MJL, Bishop S, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing questionnaire: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524–532.
    1. Swinkels-Meewisse EJ, Swinkels RA, Verbeek AL, Vlaeyen JW, Oostendorp RA. Psychometric properties of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Man Ther. 2003;8:29–36. doi: 10.1054/math.2002.0484.
    1. Miller R, Kori S, Todd D. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Philadelphia: Ref Type: Unpublished Work; 1991.
    1. Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Rogers T, Jiang H, Petersen S. A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine. 2009;34:2449.
    1. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–1019. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700009934.
    1. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B. Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine. 2001;26:2375–2380. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00015.
    1. Adamova BM, Vohanka S, Hnojcikova M, Okacova I, Dusek L, Bednarik J. Neurological impairment score in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2010;303(13):1259–1265.
    1. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:377–381.
    1. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Whipp BJ. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1987.
    1. Fanuele JC, Birkmeyer NJ, Abdu WA, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ed 6th. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1991.
    1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ed 7th. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006.
    1. Jones NL. Clinical Exercise Testing, ed Fourth. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1997.
    1. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation, ed 4th. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.
    1. Spahn JM, Reeves RS, Keim KS, Laquatra I, Kellogg M, Jortberg B, Clark NA. State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:879–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.03.021.
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303:1265.
    1. Parker SL, Zuckerman S, Shau D, Mendenhal S, Godil SS, McGirt M. 135 Comprehensive medical management of lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis is not effective in real-world care: a value analysis of cost, pain, disability and quality of life. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:E554–E555.
    1. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:285–290.
    1. Fanuele JC, Birkmeyer NJ, Abdu WA, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN. The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: have we underestimated the effect? Spine. 2000;25:1509–1514. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006150-00009.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다