Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a serious game targeting interpersonal emotion regulation in early adolescents

Gloria Mittmann, Sonja Zehetmayer, Beate Schrank, Gloria Mittmann, Sonja Zehetmayer, Beate Schrank

Abstract

Background: Adaptive interpersonal emotion regulation (iER) is a vital tool for positive relations. During early adolescence, peer relations become increasingly important, making this age group a relevant target group for interventions promoting positive interactions with each other, yet no evidence-based intervention exists for iER and early adolescents specifically.

Methods: This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to test effectiveness and feasibility of a serious game training iER skills in early adolescents by comparing outcomes with a control group playing a game without psychoeducational content in a pre- and post-test design. German- and English-speaking early adolescents (10-14 years) are eligible for participation. IER skills improvement as assessed by a vignette task is the primary outcome and will be analysed with a chi-square test. Secondary outcomes include feasibility and acceptability, emotional competence, personal emotion regulation, gender, and sex.

Discussion: This RCT will test whether playing a serious game about iER strategies results in an improvement of iER skills and whether the game is feasible and acceptable for early adolescents with the ultimate aim to implement the game in schools and help early adolescents achieve positive peer relationships.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04808102 , Registered on 19 March 2021.

Keywords: Early adolescence; Extrinsic emotion regulation; Friendship; Gender differences; Interpersonal emotion regulation; Preadolescence; Serious games; Sex differences; Social connectedness.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design for an RCT examining the effectiveness of a serious game targeting interpersonal emotion regulation

References

    1. Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998;2(3):271–299. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.
    1. Pena-Sarrionandia A, Mikolajczak M, Gross EF. Integrating emotion regulation and emotional intelligence traditions: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2015;6:160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00160.
    1. Webb TL, Miles E, Sheeran P. Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):775–808. doi: 10.1037/a0027600.
    1. Niven K, Totterdell P, Holman D. A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion. 2009;9(4):498–509. doi: 10.1037/a0015962.
    1. López-Pérez B, Morillo D, Wilson E. Development and validation of the interpersonal affect improvement strategies questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2019;35(2):280–294. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000394.
    1. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Aldao A. Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Pers Individ Diff. 2011;51(6):704–708. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.012.
    1. McRae K, Ochsner KN, Mauss IB, Gabrieli JJD, Gross JJ. Gender differences in emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2008;11(2):143–162. doi: 10.1177/1368430207088035.
    1. Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI) Psicothema. 2006;18(Suppl):13–25.
    1. Naghavi F, Redzuan M, Asgari A, Mirza M. Gender differences and construct of the early adolescent’s emotional intelligence. Life Sci J. 2012;9(2):124–128.
    1. Ryan RM, La Guardia JG, Solky-Butzel J, Chirkov V, Kim Y. On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and cultures. Pers Relat. 2005;12(1):145–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00106.x.
    1. Tamres LK, Janicki D, Helgeson VS. Sex Differences in coping behavior: a meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6(1):2–30. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1.
    1. Bancroft J. Biological factors in human sexuality. J Sex Res. 2002;39(1):15–21. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552114.
    1. Unicef . The state of world’s children 2011 - Adolescents: An age of opportunities. 2011.
    1. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J Adolesc Health. 2011;48(2):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020.
    1. Sieving RE, Perry CL, Williams CL. Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents’ alcohol use. J Adolesc Health. 2000;26(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00056-7.
    1. Gardener EK, Carr AR, MacGregor A, Felmingham KL. Sex differences and emotion regulation: an event-related potential study. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e73475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073475.
    1. Wentzel KR, Barry CM, Caldwell K. Friendships in middle school: influences on motivation and school adjustment. J Educ Psychol. 2004;96(2):195–203. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195.
    1. La Greca AM, Harrison HM. Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: do they predict social anxiety and depression? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005;34(1):49–61. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_5.
    1. Arroyo A, Segrin C. The relationship between self- and other-perceptions of communication competence and friendship quality. Commun Stud. 2011;62(5):547–562. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2011.580037.
    1. Niven K, Holman D, Totterdell P. How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: an investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Hum Relat. 2012;65(6):777–805. doi: 10.1177/0018726712439909.
    1. Niven K, Garcia D, van der Lowe I, Holman D, Mansell W. Becoming popular: interpersonal emotion regulation predicts relationship formation in real life social networks. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01452.
    1. Sim L, Zeman J. The contribution of emotion regulation to body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in early adolescent girls. J Youth Adolesc. 2006;35(2):207–216. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-9003-8.
    1. Houck CD, Barker DH, Hadley W, Brown LK, Lansing A, Almy B, Hancock E. The 1-year impact of an emotion regulation intervention on early adolescent health risk behaviors. Health Psychol. 2016;35(9):1036–1045. doi: 10.1037/hea0000360.
    1. Yap MBH, Schwartz OS, Byrne ML, Simmons JG, Allen NB. Maternal positive and negative interaction behaviors and early adolescents’ depressive symptoms: adolescent emotion regulation as a mediator. J Res Adolesc. 2010;20(4):1014–1043. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00665.x.
    1. Taylor RD, Oberle E, Durlak JA, Weissberg RP. Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: a meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Dev. 2017;88(4):1156–1171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864.
    1. Breuer J, Bente G. Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. J Comp Game Cult. 2010;4:7–24.
    1. Susi T, Johannesson M, Backlund P. Serious games: an overview. 2007.
    1. Wouters P, van Nimwegen C, van Oostendorp H, van der Spek ED. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(2):249–265. doi: 10.1037/a0031311.
    1. Hamari J, Koivisto J, Sarsa H. Does gamification work?-a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. HICSS. 2014.
    1. Sitzmann T. A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(2):489–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x.
    1. Ke F. A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. Gaming and Simulations: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications: IGI Global. 2011. pp. 1619–1665.
    1. Mittmann G, Woodcock K, Dörfler S, Krammer I, Pollak I, Schrank B. “TikTok Is My Life and Snapchat Is My Ventricle”: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of Online Communication Tools for Friendships in Early Adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2021. 10.1177/02724316211020368.
    1. Rodriguez A, Rey B, Vara MD, Wrzesien M, Alcaniz M, Banos RM, Perez-Lopez D. A VR-based serious game for studying emotional regulation in adolescents. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2015;35(1):65–73. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.8.
    1. Kahn J, Ducharme P, Travers B, Gonzalez-Heydrich J. RAGE control: regulate and gain emotional control. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;149:335–343.
    1. Merry SN, Stasiak K, Shepherd M, Frampton C, Fleming T, Lucassen MF. The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e2598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2598.
    1. López-Pérez B, Pacella D. Interpersonal emotion regulation in children: age, gender, and cross-cultural differences using a serious game. Emotion. 2021;21(1): 17–27. 10.1037/emo0000690.
    1. Pacella D, López-Pérez B. Assessing children’s interpersonal emotion regulation with virtual agents: the serious game Emodiscovery. Comp Ed. 2018;123:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.005.
    1. Leiner D. SoSci Survey (Version 3.1. 06). Computer software. 2019.
    1. Rossi PH. Vignette analysis: Uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments. In: JSC RKM, Rossi PH, editors. Qualitative and quantitative social research: Papers in honor of Paul F Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press; 1979. pp. 176–186.
    1. Young NL, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Howard CJ. Passive Facebook use, Facebook addiction, and associations with escapism: an experimental vignette study. Comp in Hum Behav. 2017;71:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.039.
    1. Facciani M, Brashears ME, Zhong J. Visual vignettes for cross-national research. Int J SocRes Methodol. 2020:1–14. 10.1080/13645579.2020.1844897.
    1. Niven K, Totterdell P, Stride CB, Holman D. Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): the development and validation of a new individual difference measure. Current Psychology. 2011;30(1):53–73. doi: 10.1007/s12144-011-9099-9.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Takšić V, Mohorić T, Duran M. Emotional skills and competence questionnaire (ESCQ) as a self-report measure of emotional intelligence. Horiz Psychol. 2009;18(3):7–21.
    1. Keebler JR, Shelstad WJ, Smith DC, Chaparro BS, Phan MH. Validation of the GUESS-18: a short version of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS) J Usability Stud. 2020;16(1):49.
    1. Krahe B, Berger A, Möller I. GRI-JUG. Instrumentarium zur Erfassung des Geschlechtsrollen-Selbstkonzepts im Jugendalter [Verfahrensdokumentation aus PSYNDEX Tests-Nr. 9005895 und Fragebogen mit Auswertungsanleitung]. Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID)(Hrsg), Elektronisches Testarchiv Trier: ZPID. 2011;383.
    1. Boot WR, Champion M, Blakely D, Wright T, Souders D, Charness N. Video game interventions to address cognitive aging. Gerontechnology. 2012;11(2):219–220. doi: 10.4017/gt.2012.11.02.145.00.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.
    1. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
    1. Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2016.
    1. Benner AD. The transition to high school: current knowledge, future directions. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(3):299–328. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9152-0.
    1. Ng-Knight T, Shelton KH, Riglin L, Frederickson N, McManus I, Rice F. ‘Best friends forever’? Friendship stability across school transition and associations with mental health and educational attainment. Br J Educ Psychol. 2019;89(4):585–599. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12246.
    1. Heinsch M, Agllias K, Sampson D, Howard A, Blakemore T, Cootes H. Peer connectedness during the transition to secondary school: a collaborative opportunity for education and social work. Austr Educ Res. 2019;47(2):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s13384-019-00335-1.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다