A randomized, multicentre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in adults with type 1 diabetes (onset 5)

David C Klonoff, Mark L Evans, Wendy Lane, Hans-Peter Kempe, Eric Renard, J Hans DeVries, Tina Graungaard, Agon Hyseni, Theis Gondolf, Tadej Battelino, David C Klonoff, Mark L Evans, Wendy Lane, Hans-Peter Kempe, Eric Renard, J Hans DeVries, Tina Graungaard, Agon Hyseni, Theis Gondolf, Tadej Battelino

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) vs insulin aspart (IAsp) used in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Materials and methods: This was a double-blind, treat-to-target, randomized, 16-week trial investigating CSII treatment with faster aspart (n = 236) or IAsp (n = 236). All available information, regardless of treatment discontinuation, was used for the evaluation of effect.

Results: Faster aspart was non-inferior to IAsp regarding the change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; primary endpoint). The mean HbA1c changed from 58.4 mmol/mol (7.5%) at baseline to 57.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with faster aspart and to 56.8 mmol/mol (7.4%) with IAsp after 16 weeks' treatment, with an estimated treatment difference (ETD) of 1.0 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14; 1.87) or 0.09% (95% CI 0.01; 0.17; P < 0.001) for non-inferiority (0.4% margin; P < 0.02 for statistical significance in favour of IAsp). Faster aspart was superior to IAsp in change from baseline in 1-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) increment after a meal test (ETD -0.91 mmol/L [95% CI -1.43; -0.39] or -16.4 mg/dL [95% CI -25.7; -7.0]; P = 0.001), with statistically significant reductions also at 30 minutes and 2 hours. The improvement in PPG was reflected in the change from baseline in 1-hour interstitial glucose increment after all meals (ETD -0.21 mmol/L [95% CI -0.31; -0.11] or -3.77 mg/dL [95% CI -5.53; -2.01]). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia (estimated rate ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.85; 1.16]). A numerical imbalance in severe hypoglycaemic episodes between faster aspart and IAsp was seen in the treatment (21 vs 7) and 4-week run-in periods (4 vs 0).

Conclusions: Faster aspart provides an effective and safe option for CSII treatment in T1D.

Keywords: CSII; clinical trial; insulin therapy; type 1 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Author contributions

D.C.K. was the principal investigator of this clinical trial and is the guarantor of this work, and, as such, had full access to all data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. A.H. was the medical specialist for the trial and had the medical responsibility on the clinical trial level. T.Gr. was the responsible statistician. All authors had access to the study data, take responsibility for the accuracy of the analysis, reviewed and contributed to the content of the manuscript, and had authority in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication, in collaboration with Novo Nordisk. All authors approved the manuscript for publication.

Data accessibility

The subject level analysis data sets for the research presented in the publication are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

© 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) over time. Error bars: ± SE (mean). *Estimated treatment difference was in favour of insulin aspart: 1.00 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14; 1.87) or 0.09% (95% CI 0.01; 0.17); P = 0.022. Non‐inferiority confirmed at 0.4% level (one‐sided test for non‐inferiority evaluated at the 2.5% level: P < 0.001). All available information regardless of treatment discontinuation was used. Faster aspart = fast‐acting insulin aspart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postprandial glucose (PPG) increment after a standardized meal test at baseline and week 16. Error bars: ± SE (mean). *Estimated treatment difference (ETD) at week 16: −0.66 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] −1.00; −0.31] or −11.8 mg/dL (95% CI −18.1; −5.6; P < 0.001). **ETD at week 16: −0.91 mmol/L (95% CI −1.43; −0.39) or −16.4 mg/dL (95% CI −25.7; −7.1; P = 0.001). ***ETD at week 16: −0.90 mmol/L (95% CI −1.58; −0.22) or −16.2 mg/dL (95% CI −28.5; −4.0; P = 0.01). All available information regardless of treatment discontinuation was used. Faster aspart = fast‐acting insulin aspart
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prandial interstitial glucose (IG) profiles. A and B, IG increment and IG at baseline. C and D, IG increment and IG at week 16. Error bars: ± SE (mean). Prandial IG increment is derived as the IG values subtracted by the mean of IG values within 15 minutes before the start of the meal. Meal times during the continuous glucose monitoring period were captured in participants' diaries. All available information regardless of treatment discontinuation was used. Faster aspart = fast‐acting insulin aspart

References

    1. Misso ML, Egberts KJ, Page M, O'Connor D, Shaw J. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;Cd005103.
    1. Pickup JC. Management of diabetes mellitus: is the pump mightier than the pen? Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:425‐433.
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:971‐978.
    1. Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T, Erichsen L, Haahr H. A pooled analysis of clinical pharmacology trials investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast‐acting insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:551‐559.
    1. Andersen G, Alluis B, Meiffren G, et al. The ultra‐rapid BioChaperone insulin lispro shows a faster onset of action and stronger early metabolic effect than Humalog. Diabetes. 2014;63:LB18.
    1. Kazda C, Leohr J, Liu R, et al. A novel formulation of insulin lispro containing citrate and treprostinil shows faster absorption and improved postprandial glucose excursions com vs Humalog in patients with T1DM. Diabetes. 2017;67:A247.
    1. Muchmore DB. The need for faster insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:157‐159.
    1. Heise T, Zijlstra E, Nosek L, Rikte T, Haahr H. Pharmacological properties of faster‐acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:208‐215.
    1. Bode BW, Johnson JA, Hyveled L, Tamer SC, Demissie M. Improved postprandial glycemic control with faster‐acting insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:25‐33.
    1. Russell‐Jones D, Bode BW, De Block C, et al. Fast‐acting insulin aspart improves glycemic control in basal‐bolus treatment for type 1 diabetes: results of a 26‐week multicenter, active‐controlled, treat‐to‐target, randomized, parallel‐group trial (onset 1). Diabetes Care. 2017;40:943‐950.
    1. Zijlstra E, Demissie M, Graungaard T, Heise T, Nosek L, Bode B. Investigation of pump compatibility of fast‐acting insulin aspart in subjects with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12:145‐151.
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1384‐1395.
    1. Mathieu C, Bode BW, Franek E, et al. Efficacy and safety of fast‐acting insulin aspart in comparison with insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (onset 1): a 52‐week, randomized, treat‐to‐target, phase III trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1148‐1155.
    1. Bowering K, Case C, Harvey J, et al. Faster aspart versus insulin aspart as part of a basal‐bolus regimen in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: the onset 2 trial. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:951‐957.
    1. . NCT03212950. . Accessed November 30, 2018.
    1. . NCT03579615. . Accessed November 30, 2018.
    1. . NCT03554486. . Accessed November 30, 2018.
    1. . NCT03262116. . Accessed November 30, 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다