Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): antitumor and antimetastatic activities in preclinical models of colorectal cancer

Roberta Schmieder, Jens Hoffmann, Michael Becker, Ajay Bhargava, Tina Müller, Nicole Kahmann, Peter Ellinghaus, Robert Adams, André Rosenthal, Karl-Heinz Thierauch, Arne Scholz, Scott M Wilhelm, Dieter Zopf, Roberta Schmieder, Jens Hoffmann, Michael Becker, Ajay Bhargava, Tina Müller, Nicole Kahmann, Peter Ellinghaus, Robert Adams, André Rosenthal, Karl-Heinz Thierauch, Arne Scholz, Scott M Wilhelm, Dieter Zopf

Abstract

Regorafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor, has recently demonstrated overall survival benefits in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Our study aimed to gain further insight into the molecular mechanisms of regorafenib and to assess its potential in combination therapy. Regorafenib was tested alone and in combination with irinotecan in patient-derived (PD) CRC models and a murine CRC liver metastasis model. Mechanism of action was investigated using in vitro functional assays, immunohistochemistry and correlation with CRC-related oncogenes. Regorafenib demonstrated significant inhibition of growth-factor-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2 and VEGFR3 autophosphorylation, and intracellular VEGFR3 signaling in human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HuVECs) and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), and also blocked migration of LECs. Furthermore, regorafenib inhibited proliferation in 19 of 25 human CRC cell lines and markedly slowed tumor growth in five of seven PD xenograft models. Combination of regorafenib with irinotecan significantly delayed tumor growth after extended treatment in four xenograft models. Reduced CD31 staining indicates that the antiangiogenic effects of regorafenib contribute to its antitumor activity. Finally, regorafenib significantly delayed disease progression in a murine CRC liver metastasis model by inhibiting the growth of established liver metastases and preventing the formation of new metastases in other organs. In addition, our results suggest that regorafenib displays antimetastatic activity, which may contribute to its efficacy in patients with metastatic CRC. Combination of regorafenib and irinotecan demonstrated an increased antitumor effect and could provide a future treatment option for CRC patients.

Keywords: CRC; antimetastasis; antitumorigenesis; multikinase inhibitor; regorafenib.

© 2013 The Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of UICC.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regorafenib inhibits growth-factor-stimulated VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 autophosphorylation in human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HuVECs) and intracellular signaling and migration in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs). Western blot analysis of (a) VEGFR2 and (b) VEGFR3, ERK1/2 and AKT from total cell lysates from (a) HuVECs and (b) LECs. All cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of regorafenib and subsequently stimulated with (a) VEGF-A or (b) VEGF-C. (c) Migration inhibition analyzed by scratch assay in LECs. Images are taken after 40 hr of incubation with 200 ng/mL VEGF-C. Boundaries of cell growth are marked by black lines. * indicates nonspecific signals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Inhibition of proliferation and intracellular signaling by regorafenib in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines. (a) Dose-dependent regorafenib-mediated inhibition of proliferation in 25 human CRC cell lines and mutational status of key oncogenic CRC driver genes taken from the COSMIC database of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. (b) Western blot analyses of phosphorylated ERK1/2 from total cell lysates treated with the indicated concentrations of regorafenib.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Antitumor activity of regorafenib alone and in combination with irinotecan in oxaliplatin- and bevacizumab-refractory patient-derived colorectal cancer xenografts. Tumor growth curves (a, c) and time-to-event probability curves (b, d) of xenograft Co8183 (a, b) and xenograft Co8469 (c, d) are shown. Respective data for xenografts Co8541 and Co8213 are provided in Supporting Information Fig. 1. For tumor growth curves, data show arithmetic mean (±standard deviation) tumor volumes after treatment with oral vehicle or regorafenib, or intraperitoneal oxaliplatin or irinotecan according to the schedule depicted in a and c. Hatched areas indicate combination treatments. n = 8 animals/group. Arrows in a and c indicate the endpoints and dotted horizontal lines the defined tumor volume (event) used for the time-to-event probability calculations. In figures b and d (+) indicates censored events and (o) indicates nondrug-related death.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Tumor growth inhibition of patient-derived colorectal cancer (PD CRC) xenografts by regorafenib is mediated by antiangiogenic effects. Frozen sections of xenografts of model Co5896 grown in mice and treated orally with vehicle or regorafenib at a dose of 10 mg/kg per day for 22 days were stained immunohistochemically with antibodies against the endothelial cell marker protein CD31. (a) The percentage of CD31-positive area was determined and statistically evaluated as described in Material and Methods (n = 4; p = 0.0028). (b) Representative images of CD31 staining. The inset depicts an isotype IgG2a control image.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Antimetastatic activity of regorafenib in a murine CRC liver metastasis model. (a) Kaplan–Meier plot showing animal survival after treatment with vehicle or regorafenib (n = 10; p = 0.009). (b) Liver weights of mice killed at the time when the first animal in the vehicle group was sacrificed (n = 6; p < 0.05). (c) Representative images of metastases of the (left) liver and (right) mesenterium of vehicle-treated animals.

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
    1. Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, et al. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:366–78.
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29.
    1. Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–94.
    1. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893–907.
    1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–41.
    1. Chibaudel B, Tournigand C, André T, et al. Therapeutic strategy in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, 2012. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012;4:75–89.
    1. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A. Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 2):v93–v97.
    1. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–67.
    1. Saif MW, Chu E. Biology of colorectal cancer. Cancer J. 2010;16:196–201.
    1. Goldstein NS, Armin M. Epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical reactivity in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV colon adenocarcinoma: implications for a standardized scoring system. Cancer. 2001;92:1331–46.
    1. Tol J, Koopman M, Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:563–72.
    1. Custodio A, Feliu J. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: beyond KRAS mutations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;85:45–81.
    1. Troiani T, Martinelli E, Orditura M, et al. Beyond bevacizumab: new anti-VEGF strategies in colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2012;21:949–59.
    1. Takahashi Y, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlates with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human colon cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:3964–8.
    1. Takahashi Y, Tucker SL, Kitadai Y, et al. Vessel counts and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic factors in node-negative colon cancer. Arch Surg. 1997;132:541–6.
    1. Mandriota SJ, Jussila L, Jeltsch M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumor metastasis. EMBO J. 2001;20:672–82.
    1. Wilhelm SM, Dumas J, Adnane L, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:245–55.
    1. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: an international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (CORRECT) Lancet. 2013;381:303–12.
    1. Corbett TH, Griswold DP, Roberts BJ, et al. Tumor induction relationships in the development of transplantable cancers of the colon in mice for chemotherapy assays, with a note on carcinogen structure. Cancer Res. 1975;35:2434–9.
    1. Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8012–17.
    1. Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L, et al. BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7099–109.
    1. Fichtner I, Slisow W, Gill J, et al. Anticancer drug response and expression of molecular markers in early-passage xenotransplanted colon carcinomas. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:298–307.
    1. Pechańska P, Becker M, Mayr T, et al. Mutation status of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and expression level of AREG and EREG identify responders to cetuximab in a large panel of patient derived colorectal carcinoma xenografts of all four UICC stages. J Cancer Ther. 2013;4:678–93.
    1. Morton CL, Iacono L, Hyatt JL, et al. Activation and antitumor activity of CPT-11 in plasma esterase-deficient mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;56:629–36.
    1. Strumberg D, Scheulen ME, Schultheis B, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1722–7.
    1. Koyama M, Matsuzaki Y, Yogosawa S, et al. ZD1839 induces p15INK4b and causes G1 arrest by inhibiting the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:1579–87.
    1. Meyer RD, Sacks DB, Rahimi N. IQGAP1-dependent signaling pathway regulates endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3848.
    1. Zopf D, Heinig R, Thierauch KH, et al. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506): preclinical pharmacology and clinical identification and quantification of its major metabolites. Cancer Res. 2010;70(Suppl 1):Abstract 1666.
    1. Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, DeVore RF, et al. A multicenter, phase II trial of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85:786–95.
    1. Zopf D, Scholz A, Fichtner I. Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506): a broad spectrum tumor deactivator with high combinability potential and antimetastasis activity. Cancer Res. 2011;71(Suppl 1) , et al. ):Abstract 4262.
    1. Schultheis B, Folprecht G, Kuhlmann J, et al. Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1560–7.
    1. Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL. Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2729–35.
    1. Bocci G, Falcone A, Fioravanti A, et al. Antiangiogenic and anticolorectal cancer effects of metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy alone and in combination with semaxanib. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1619–29.
    1. Eichten A, Adler AP, Cooper B, et al. Rapid decrease in tumor perfusion following VEGF blockade predicts long-term tumor growth inhibition in preclinical tumor models. Angiogenesis. 2013;16:429–41.
    1. Kopetz S, Hoff PM, Morris JS, et al. Phase II trial of infusional fluorouracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy and circulating angiogenic biomarkers associated with therapeutic resistance. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:453–9.
    1. Vendramini-Costa DB, Carvalho JE. Molecular link mechanisms between inflammation and cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:3831–52.
    1. Negri FV, Wotherspoon A, Cunningham D, et al. Mucinous histology predicts for reduced fluorouracil responsiveness and survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:1305–10.
    1. Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, et al. Regulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of human colon cancer tumorigenesis in a mouse model of experimental liver metastasis. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1789–97.
    1. Bruns CJ, Liu W, Davis DW, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor is an in vivo survival factor for tumor endothelium in a murine model of colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. Cancer. 2000;89:488–99.
    1. Tammela T, Zarkada G, Wallgard E, et al. Blocking VEGFR-3 suppresses angiogenic sprouting and vascular network formation. Nature. 2008;454:656–60.
    1. He Y, Kozaki K, Karpanen T, et al. Suppression of tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:819–25.
    1. Abou-Elkacem L, Arns S, Brix G, et al. Regorafenib inhibits growth, angiogenesis and metastasis in a highly aggressive, orthotopic colon cancer model. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1322–31.
    1. Penna C, Nordlinger B. Colorectal metastasis (liver and lung) Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82:1075–90.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다