Predictive nature of IgM anti-α-glucose serum biomarker for relapse activity and EDSS progression in CIS patients: a BENEFIT study analysis

M S Freedman, C Metzig, L Kappos, C H Polman, G Edan, H-P Hartung, D H Miller, X Montalban, J Yarden, L Spector, E Fire, N Dotan, S Schwenke, V Lanius, R Sandbrink, C Pohl, M S Freedman, C Metzig, L Kappos, C H Polman, G Edan, H-P Hartung, D H Miller, X Montalban, J Yarden, L Spector, E Fire, N Dotan, S Schwenke, V Lanius, R Sandbrink, C Pohl

Abstract

Background: Higher serum levels of at least one of a panel of four α-glucose IgM antibodies (gMS-Classifier1) in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients are associated with imminent early relapse within 2 years.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of gMS-Classifier1 in a large study cohort of CIS patients.

Methods: The BEtaseron(®) in Newly Emerging multiple sclerosis For Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) 5-year study was designed to evaluate the impact of early versus delayed interferon-β-1b (IFNβ-1b; Betaseron(®)) treatment in patients with a first event suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients (n = 258, 61% of total) with a minimum of 2 ml baseline serum were eligible for the biomarker study. gMS-Classifier1 antibodies' panel (anti-GAGA2, anti-GAGA3, anti-GAGA4 and anti-GAGA6) levels were measured blinded to clinical data. Subjects were classified as either 'positive' or 'negative' according to a classification rule.

Results: gMS-Classifier1 was not predictive for the time to clinically definite MS or time to MS according to the revised McDonald's criteria, but did significantly predict an increased risk for confirmed disability progression (log-rank test: p = 0.012).

Conclusions: We could not confirm previous results that gMS-Classifier1 can predict early conversion to MS in CIS. However, raised titres of these antibodies may predict early disability progression in this patient population.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: MS Freedman is a consultant/advisory board member for Bayer HealthCare, Glycominds, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva Neuroscience. He serves on steering committees for Bayer HealthCare, Merck Serono, Celgene, Biogen Idec, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis.

L Kappos discloses that the University Hospital Basel has received research support from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. L Kappos has been principal investigator, member, or chair of steering committees or advisory boards in MS clinical trials sponsored by Abbott Laboratories, Bayer HealthCare, Bayhill, Berlex, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Eisai, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Immune Response, Medicinova, Neurocrine, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck Serono, Roche, Teva Pharmaceuticals, UCB Pharma, and Wyeth, and has received lecture fees from one or more of these companies. Payments and consultancy fees have been exclusively used for the support of research activities.

C Polman has received consulting fees from Biogen Idec, Bayer HealthCare, Teva, Serono, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, UCB, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Antisense Therapeutics; lecture fees from Biogen Idec, Bayer HealthCare, Novartis, and Teva; grant support from Biogen Idec, Bayer HealthCare, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Serono, and Teva.

G Edan received personal compensation for serving on an advisory board for BENEFIT, has received honoraria for consultation or research grants from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Teva-Aventis, LFB.

H-P Hartung has received honoraria and consultancy fees from, and participated as an investigator in phase 2 and 3 trials for, Biogen Idec, Bayer Vital, Bayer HealthCare, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals. H-P Hartung has received research grant support from Biogen Idec, Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Teva Pharmaceuticals with approval by the rector of HHU.

DH Miller has received grant support from Biogen Idec, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline for performance of MRI analyses in clinical trials, as well as honoraria for advisory or consultancy work, lectures, and related travel expenses from Biogen Idec, Bayer HealthCare, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline.

X Montalban has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, EMD Merck Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Almirall.

C Metzig, V Lanius, C Pohl, R Sandbrink, and S Schwenke are salaried employees of Bayer Pharma AG.

J Yarden, L Spector, E Fire, and N Dotan are salaried employees of Glycominds and hold stock options from Glycominds.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan–Meier curves for gMS-Classifier1 positive versus negative patients with respect to (A) time to clinically definite multiple sclerosis, (B) time to McDonald MS and (C) time to confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression. *Log-rank test p-value for comparison of gMS-Classifier1 groups with respect to time-to-event variables. Analyses performed using sera set A.

References

    1. McAlpine D. The benign form of multiple sclerosis. A study based on 241 cases seen within three years of onset and followed up until the tenth year or more of the disease. Brain 1961; 84: 186–203
    1. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course. Brain 1989; 112: 1419–1428
    1. Runmarker B, Andersen O. Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty five years of follow-up. Brain 1993; 116: 117–134
    1. Achiron A, Barak Y. Multiple sclerosis from probable to definite diagnosis: a 7 year prospective study. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 974–979
    1. Galboiz Y, Miller A. lmmunological indicators of disease activity and prognosis in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2002; 15: 233–237
    1. O’Riordan JI, Thompson AJ, Kingsley DPE, MacManus DG, Kendall BE, Rudge P, et al. The prognostic value of brain MRI in clinically isolated syndromes of the CNS: a 10-year follow-up. Brain 1998; 121: 495–503
    1. Brex PA, Ciccarelli O, O’Riordan JI, Sailer M, Thompson AJ, Miller DH. A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 158–164
    1. Dalton CM, Brex PA, Miszkiel KA, Hickman SJ, MacManus DG, Plant GT, et al. Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2002; 52: 47–53
    1. Fisniku LK, Brex PA, Altmann DR, Miszkiel KA, Benton CE, Lanyon R, et al. Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2008; 131: 808–817
    1. Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, Nos C, Grivé E, Téllez N, et al. Baseline MRI predicts future attacks and disability in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2006; 67: 968–972
    1. Berger T, Rubner P, Schautzer F, Egg R, Ulmer H, Mayringer I, et al. Antimyelin antibodies as a predictor of clinically definite multiple sclerosis after a first demyelinating event. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 139–145
    1. Kuhle J, Pohl C, Mehling M, Edan G, Freedman MS, Hartung HP, et al. Lack of association between antimyelin antibodies and progression to multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 371–378
    1. Pelayo R, Tintoré M, Montalban X, Rovira A, Espejo C, Reindl M, et al. Antimyelin antibodies with no progression to multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 426–428
    1. Schwarz M, Spector L, Gortler M, Weisshaus O, Glass-Marmor L, Karni A, et al. Serum anti-Glc(alphal,4)Glc(alpha) antibodies as a biomarker for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2006; 244: 59–68
    1. Brettschneider J, Jaskowski TD, Tumani H, Abdul S, Husebye D, Seraj H, et al. Serum anti-GAGA4 IgM antibodies differentiate relapsing remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis from primary progressive multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases. J Neuroimmunol 2009; 217: 95–101
    1. Freedman MS, Laks J, Dotan N, Altstock RT, Dukler A, Sindic CJ. Anti-alpha-glucose-based glycan IgM antibodies predict relapse activity in multiple sclerosis after the first neurological event. Mult Scler 2009; 15: 422–430
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 840-846
    1. Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, et al. BENEFIT Study Group. Long-term effect of early treatment with interferon beta 1b after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: 5-year active treatment extension of the phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 987–997
    1. Schwarz M, Spector L, Gargir A, Shtevi A, Gortler M, Altstock RT, et al. A new kind of carbohydrate array, its use for profiling antiglycan antibodies, and the discovery of a novel human cellulose-binding antibody. Glycobiology 2003; 13: 749–754
    1. Masjuan J, Alvarez-Cermeño JC, García-Barragán N, Díaz-Sánchez M, Espiño M, Sádaba MC, et al. Clinically isolated syndromes: a new oligoclonal band test accurately predicts conversion to MS. Neurology 2006; 66: 576–578
    1. Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, Tur C, Pelayo R, Nos C, et al. Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology 2008; 70: 1079–1083
    1. Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Moreau T, Adeleine P. Relapses and progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. New Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1430–1438
    1. Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Adeleine P. Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain 2003; 126: 770–782
    1. Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Degenhardt A, Rice GP, Muraro PA, Daumer M, et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 10: relapses and long-term disability. Brain 2010; 133: 1914–1929
    1. Lublin FD, Baier M, Cutter G. Effect of relapses on development of residual deficit in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2003; 61: 1528-1532
    1. Lublin FD. The incomplete nature of multiple sclerosis relapse resolution. J Neurol Sci 2007; 256: S14-S18
    1. Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, Miller DH, et al. Treatment with interferon beta 1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2006; 67: 1242–1249
    1. Degenhardt A., Ramagopalan SV, Scalfari A, Ebers GC. Clinical prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis: a natural history review. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5: 672–682
    1. Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F, Durelli L, Edan G, Fernández O, et al. Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomised study. Lancet 2001; 357: 1576–1582
    1. Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, Kinkel RP, Brownscheidle CM, Murray TJ, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 898–904
    1. Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, Durelli L, Edan G, Fernández O, et al. ; PreCISe study group. Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 1503–1511
    1. Freedman MS. Induction vs. escalation of therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis: the evidence. Neurol Sci 2008; 29: S47–S51
    1. Miller JR. The importance of early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Manag Care Pharm 2004; 10: S4–S11
    1. Kantarci OH, Weinshenker BG. Prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis. In Cook SD. (ed.) Handbook of Multiple Sclerosis, third edition New York: Marcel Dekker, 2001, pp. 449–463

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다