Safety and efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA doses up to 800 U in limb spasticity: The TOWER study

Jörg Wissel, Djamel Bensmail, Joaquim J Ferreira, Franco Molteni, Lalith Satkunam, Susana Moraleda, Tiina Rekand, John McGuire, Astrid Scheschonka, Birgit Flatau-Baqué, Olivier Simon, Edward T J Rochford, Dirk Dressler, David M Simpson, TOWER study investigators, Stephen McNeil, Isabelle Laffont, Frédéric Pellas, Manuel Dafotakis, Markus Ebke, Martin Hecht, Peter Kossmehl, David Liebetanz, Friedemann Müller, Iris Reuter, Walter Raffauf, Tobias Wächter, Sergio Barbieri, Alessio Baricich, Mario Basciani, Giancarlo Ianieri, Maurizio Osio, Francesco Sciarrini, Nicola Smania, Tiina Ader, Luisa Medeiros, Montserrat Abenoza Guardiola, Josefina Junyent Pares, Lourdes López de Munaín, Marina Tirado, François Bethoux, William Bockenek, Shashank Davé, Bruce Rubin, Jörg Wissel, Djamel Bensmail, Joaquim J Ferreira, Franco Molteni, Lalith Satkunam, Susana Moraleda, Tiina Rekand, John McGuire, Astrid Scheschonka, Birgit Flatau-Baqué, Olivier Simon, Edward T J Rochford, Dirk Dressler, David M Simpson, TOWER study investigators, Stephen McNeil, Isabelle Laffont, Frédéric Pellas, Manuel Dafotakis, Markus Ebke, Martin Hecht, Peter Kossmehl, David Liebetanz, Friedemann Müller, Iris Reuter, Walter Raffauf, Tobias Wächter, Sergio Barbieri, Alessio Baricich, Mario Basciani, Giancarlo Ianieri, Maurizio Osio, Francesco Sciarrini, Nicola Smania, Tiina Ader, Luisa Medeiros, Montserrat Abenoza Guardiola, Josefina Junyent Pares, Lourdes López de Munaín, Marina Tirado, François Bethoux, William Bockenek, Shashank Davé, Bruce Rubin

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate safety (primary objective) and efficacy of increasing doses (400 U up to 800 U) of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH) for patients with limb spasticity.

Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, dose-titration study (NCT01603459), patients (18-80 years) with spasticity due to cerebral causes, who were clinically deemed to require total doses of 800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, received 3 consecutive injection cycles (ICs) with 400 U, 600 U, and 600-800 U incobotulinumtoxinA, respectively, each followed by 12-16 weeks' observation. Outcomes included adverse events (AEs), antibody testing, Resistance to Passive Movement Scale (REPAS; based on the Ashworth Scale), and Goal Attainment Scale.

Results: In total, 155 patients were enrolled. IncobotulinumtoxinA dose escalation did not lead to an increased incidence of treatment-related AEs (IC1: 4.5%; IC2: 5.3%; IC3: 2.9%). No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. The most frequent AEs overall were falls (7.7%), nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, and diarrhea (6.5% each). Five patients (3.2%) discontinued due to AEs. No patient developed secondary nonresponse due to neutralizing antibodies. Mean (SD) REPAS score improvements from each injection to 4 weeks postinjection increased throughout the study (IC1: -4.6 [3.9]; IC2: -5.9 [4.2]; IC3: -7.1 [4.8]; p < 0.0001 for all). The proportion of patients achieving ≥3 (of 4) treatment goals also increased (IC1: 25.2%; IC2: 50.7%; IC3: 68.6%).

Conclusion: Escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) did not compromise safety or tolerability, enabled treatment in a greater number of muscles/spasticity patterns, and was associated with increased treatment efficacy, improved muscle tone, and goal attainment.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT01603459.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that, for patients with limb spasticity, escalating incobotulinumtoxinA doses (400 U up to 800 U) increases treatment efficacy without compromising safety or tolerability.

Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Study design
Figure 1. Study design
*If a dose of 800 U was not justified for clinical or safety reasons, a lower dose of 600–800 U could be administered as an exception. TC = telephone contact; V = visit.
Figure 2. Efficacy outcomes
Figure 2. Efficacy outcomes
(A) Each patient and health care team identified 2 realistic treatment goals per limb (1 active and 1 passive) at each injection visit. Goal attainment for each injection cycle was rated at the next injection visit or the end of study visit. (B) The proportions of patients with a rating of very good or good are shown. Possible ratings were 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor.

References

    1. Wissel J, Ward AB, Erztgaard P, et al. . European consensus table on the use of botulinum toxin type A in adult spasticity. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:13–25.
    1. Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman EJ, et al. . Practice guideline update summary: botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2016;86:1818–1826.
    1. Esquenazi A, Novak I, Sheean G, Singer BJ, Ward AB. International consensus statement for the use of botulinum toxin treatment in adults and children with neurological impairments: introduction. Eur J Neurol 2010;17(Suppl 2):1–8.
    1. Royal College of Physicians, British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Association of Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology. Spasticity in adults: management using botulinum toxin: national guidelines [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 1, 2016.
    1. Bakheit AM, Fedorova NV, Skoromets AA, Timerbaeva SL, Bhakta BB, Coxon L. The beneficial antispasticity effect of botulinum toxin type A is maintained after repeated treatment cycles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1558–1561.
    1. Barnes M, Schnitzler A, Medeiros L, Aguilar M, Lehnert-Batar A, Minnasch P. Efficacy and safety of NT 201 for upper limb spasticity of various etiologies: a randomized parallel-group study. Acta Neurol Scand 2010;122:295–302.
    1. Elovic EP, Brashear A, Kaelin D, et al. . Repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type A produce sustained decreases in the limitations associated with focal upper-limb poststroke spasticity for caregivers and patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:799–806.
    1. Kaňovský P, Slawek J, Denes Z, et al. . Efficacy and safety of botulinum neurotoxin NT 201 in poststroke upper limb spasticity. Clin Neuropharmacol 2009;32:259–265.
    1. Kaňovský P, Slawek J, Denes Z, et al. . Efficacy and safety of treatment with incobotulinum toxin A (botulinum neurotoxin type A free from complexing proteins; NT 201) in post-stroke upper limb spasticity. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:486–492.
    1. Elovic EP, Munin MC, Kaňovský P, Hanschmann A, Hiersemenzel R, Marciniak C. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of incobotulinumtoxinA for upper-limb post-stroke spasticity. Muscle Nerve 2016;53:415–421.
    1. Kaji R, Osako Y, Suyama K, Maeda T, Uechi Y, Iwasaki M. Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke lower limb spasticity: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Neurol 2010;257:1330–1337.
    1. Allergan, Inc. Botox® US Prescribing Information [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Ipsen Biopharm, Ltd. Dysport® US Prescribing Information [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Allergan. Botox® 100 U Summary of Product Characteristics [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Ipsen. Dysport® 300 U and 500 U Summary of Product Characteristics [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Merz Pharma UK Ltd. XEOMIN® 100 U Summary of Product Characteristics [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Merz Pharmaceuticals L. Xeomin® US Prescribing Information [online]. Available at: . Accessed January 6, 2016.
    1. Bensmail D, Hanschmann A, Wissel J. Satisfaction with botulinum toxin treatment in post-stroke spasticity: results from two cross-sectional surveys (patients and physicians). J Med Econ 2014;17:618–625.
    1. Dressler D. Routine use of Xeomin in patients previously treated with Botox: long term results. Eur J Neurol 2009;16(Suppl 2):2–5.
    1. Dressler D, Saberi FA, Kollewe K, Schrader C. Safety aspects of incobotulinumtoxinA high-dose therapy. J Neural Transm 2015;122:327–333.
    1. Santamato A, Panza F, Ranieri M, et al. . Efficacy and safety of higher doses of botulinum toxin type A NT 201 free from complexing proteins in the upper and lower limb spasticity after stroke. J Neural Transm 2013;120:469–476.
    1. Baricich A, Grana E, Carda S, Santamato A, Cisari C, Invernizzi M. High doses of onabotulinumtoxinA in post-stroke spasticity: a retrospective analysis. J Neural Transm 2015;122:1283–1287.
    1. Intiso D, Simone V, Di Rienzo F, et al. . High doses of a new botulinum toxin type A (NT-201) in adult patients with severe spasticity following brain injury and cerebral palsy. Neurorehabilitation 2014;34:515–522.
    1. Santamato A, Micello MF, Ranieri M, et al. . Employment of higher doses of botulinum toxin type A to reduce spasticity after stroke. J Neurol Sci 2015;350:1–6.
    1. Dressler D. Five-year experience with incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R): the first botulinum toxin drug free of complexing proteins. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:385–389.
    1. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540–542.
    1. Platz T, Vuadens P, Eickhof C, Arnold P, Van Kaick S, Heise K. REPAS, a summary rating scale for resistance to passive movement: item selection, reliability and validity. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:44–53.
    1. Turner-Stokes L, Baguley IJ, De Graaff S, et al. . Goal attainment scaling in the evaluation of treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin: a secondary analysis from a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:81–89.
    1. Fabbri M, Leodori G, Fernandes RM, et al. . Neutralizing antibody and botulinum toxin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurotox Res 2016;29:105–117.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다