Using Mobile Sensing to Test Clinical Models of Depression, Social Anxiety, State Affect, and Social Isolation Among College Students

Philip I Chow, Karl Fua, Yu Huang, Wesley Bonelli, Haoyi Xiong, Laura E Barnes, Bethany A Teachman, Philip I Chow, Karl Fua, Yu Huang, Wesley Bonelli, Haoyi Xiong, Laura E Barnes, Bethany A Teachman

Abstract

Background: Research in psychology demonstrates a strong link between state affect (moment-to-moment experiences of positive or negative emotionality) and trait affect (eg, relatively enduring depression and social anxiety symptoms), and a tendency to withdraw (eg, spending time at home). However, existing work is based almost exclusively on static, self-reported descriptions of emotions and behavior that limit generalizability. Despite adoption of increasingly sophisticated research designs and technology (eg, mobile sensing using a global positioning system [GPS]), little research has integrated these seemingly disparate forms of data to improve understanding of how emotional experiences in everyday life are associated with time spent at home, and whether this is influenced by depression or social anxiety symptoms.

Objective: We hypothesized that more time spent at home would be associated with more negative and less positive affect.

Methods: We recruited 72 undergraduate participants from a southeast university in the United States. We assessed depression and social anxiety symptoms using self-report instruments at baseline. An app (Sensus) installed on participants' personal mobile phones repeatedly collected in situ self-reported state affect and GPS location data for up to 2 weeks. Time spent at home was a proxy for social isolation.

Results: We tested separate models examining the relations between state affect and time spent at home, with levels of depression and social anxiety as moderators. Models differed only in the temporal links examined. One model focused on associations between changes in affect and time spent at home within short, 4-hour time windows. The other 3 models focused on associations between mean-level affect within a day and time spent at home (1) the same day, (2) the following day, and (3) the previous day. Overall, we obtained many of the expected main effects (although there were some null effects), in which higher social anxiety was associated with more time or greater likelihood of spending time at home, and more negative or less positive affect was linked to longer homestay. Interactions indicated that, among individuals higher in social anxiety, higher negative affect and lower positive affect within a day was associated with greater likelihood of spending time at home the following day.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate the feasibility and utility of modeling the relationship between affect and homestay using fine-grained GPS data. Although these findings must be replicated in a larger study and with clinical samples, they suggest that integrating repeated state affect assessments in situ with continuous GPS data can increase understanding of how actual homestay is related to affect in everyday life and to symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Keywords: affect; depression; homestay; mHealth; mental health; mobile health; social anxiety.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Philip I Chow, Karl Fua, Yu Huang, Wesley Bonelli, Haoyi Xiong, Laura E Barnes, Bethany A Teachman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 03.03.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of positive (left) and negative (right) state affect rating as seen on a mobile phone screen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of global positioning system (GPS) location data overlaid on a satellite image. The colors indicate the amount of time spent at various locations (more red indicating more time spent at a particular location, with the red line indicating a path connecting various locations).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Interactions of mean-level negative (left panel) and positive (right panel) affect with probability of being at home the next day, for those high (1 SD above the mean, in red) and low (1 SD below the mean, in blue) in social anxiety. The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) score was entered as a continuous variable in all models, although to illustrate the interaction effects, only the effects of those high and low in SIAS are plotted.

References

    1. American College Health Association . American College Health Association National College Health Assessment II: spring 2014 Reference Group executive summary. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association; 2014. [2017-02-22]. .
    1. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM, Beautrais AL. Subthreshold depression in adolescence and mental health outcomes in adulthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;62(1):66–72. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.66.
    1. Filho AS, Hetem LA, Ferrari MC, Trzesniak C, Martín-Santos R, Borduqui T, de Lima Osório F, Loureiro SR, Busatto FG, Zuardi AW, Crippa JA. Social anxiety disorder: what are we losing with the current diagnostic criteria? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010 Mar;121(3):216–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01459.x.
    1. Hettema JM, Neale MC, Myers JM, Prescott CA, Kendler KS. A population-based twin study of the relationship between neuroticism and internalizing disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):857–64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.857.
    1. Kashdan TB, Steger MF. Expanding the topography of social anxiety. An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):120–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01674.x.
    1. Nutt D, Demyttenaere K, Janka Z, Aarre T, Bourin M, Canonico PL, Carrasco JL, Stahl S. The other face of depression, reduced positive affect: the role of catecholamines in causation and cure. J Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jul;21(5):461–71. doi: 10.1177/0269881106069938.
    1. Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS Scales. J Personality Social Psychol. 1994;67(2):319–33. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.
    1. Kok BE, Coffey KA, Cohn MA, Catalino LI, Vacharkulksemsuk T, Algoe SB, Brantley M, Fredrickson BL. How positive emotions build physical health: perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychological Science. 2013 May 06;24(7):1123–32. doi: 10.1177/0956797612470827.
    1. Van de Mortel TF Faking it: social desirability response bias in self-report research. Aust J Adv Nurs Jun. 2008;25(4):40–8.
    1. Kaiser R, Hubley S, Dimidjian S. Behavioural activation theory. In: Wells A, Fisher P, editors. Treating Depression: MCT, CBT and Third Wave Therapies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2015. pp. 221–41.
    1. Barlow D, editor. Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2014.
    1. Huang Y, Xiong H, Leach K, Zhang Y, Chow P, Fua K, Teachman B, Barnes L. Assessing social anxiety using GPS trajectories and point-of-interest data. 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 12-16, 2016; Heidelberg, Germany. 2016. pp. 898–903.
    1. Saeb S, Zhang M, Karr CJ, Schueller SM, Corden ME, Kording KP, Mohr DC. Mobile phone sensor correlates of depressive symptom severity in daily-life behavior: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e175. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4273.
    1. Wang R, Chen F, Chen Z, Li T, Harari G, Tignor S, Zhou X, Ben-Zeev D, Campbell AT. StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones. ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 13-17, 2014; Seattle, WA, USA. 2014. Sep, pp. 3–14.
    1. Mattick RP, Clarke J. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1998 Apr;36(4):455–70. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6.
    1. Heimberg RG, Mueller GP, Holt CS, Hope DA, Liebowitz MR. Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behav Ther. 1992 Dec 01;23(1):53–73. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.
    1. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, Sanislow C, Wang P. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;167(7):748–51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.
    1. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335–43.
    1. Xiong H, Huang Y, Barnes L, Gerber M. Sensus: a cross-platform, general-purpose system for mobile crowdsensing in human-subject studies. ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 12-16, 2016; Heidelberg, Germany. 2016. Sep, pp. 415–26.
    1. Kang J, Welbourne W, Stewart B, Borriello G. Extracting places from traces of locations. 2nd ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applicationsservices on WLAN hotspots; October 1, 2004; Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2004. pp. 110–8.
    1. Hasan S, Zhan X, Ukkusuri S. Understanding urban human activitymobility patterns using large-scale location-based data from online social media. 2nd ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing; August 11, 2013; Chicago, IL, USA. 2013.
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4: R package version. 2014. Jun 23, [2017-02-27]. .
    1. Barton K. MuMIn: multi model inference: model selection and model averaging based on information criteria. 2016. Jan 07, .
    1. Williams R. Using heterogeneous choice models to compare logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociol Methods Res. 2009 May;37(4):531–59. doi: 10.1177/0049124109335735.
    1. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236–8.
    1. Saeb S, Lattie EG, Schueller SM, Kording KP, Mohr DC. The relationship between mobile phone location sensor data and depressive symptom severity. PeerJ. 2016 Sep 29;4:e2537. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2537.
    1. Fox E, Russo R, Dutton K. Attentional bias for threat: evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cogn Emot. 2002 May 01;16(3):355–79. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000527.
    1. Chow PI, Bonelli W, Huang Y, Fua K, Teachman BA, Barnes LE. DEMONS: an integrated framework for examining associations between physiology and self-reported affect tied to depressive symptoms. 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 12-16, 2016; Heidelberg, Germany. 2016. pp. 1139–43.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다