Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE)

Stephen R D Johnston, Nadia Harbeck, Roberto Hegg, Masakazu Toi, Miguel Martin, Zhi Min Shao, Qing Yuan Zhang, Jorge Luis Martinez Rodriguez, Mario Campone, Erika Hamilton, Joohyuk Sohn, Valentina Guarneri, Morihito Okada, Frances Boyle, Patrick Neven, Javier Cortés, Jens Huober, Andrew Wardley, Sara M Tolaney, Irfan Cicin, Ian C Smith, Martin Frenzel, Desirée Headley, Ran Wei, Belen San Antonio, Maarten Hulstijn, Joanne Cox, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Priya Rastogi, monarchE Committee Members and Investigators, Stephen R D Johnston, Nadia Harbeck, Roberto Hegg, Masakazu Toi, Miguel Martin, Zhi Min Shao, Qing Yuan Zhang, Jorge Luis Martinez Rodriguez, Mario Campone, Erika Hamilton, Joohyuk Sohn, Valentina Guarneri, Morihito Okada, Frances Boyle, Patrick Neven, Javier Cortés, Jens Huober, Andrew Wardley, Sara M Tolaney, Irfan Cicin, Ian C Smith, Martin Frenzel, Desirée Headley, Ran Wei, Belen San Antonio, Maarten Hulstijn, Joanne Cox, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Priya Rastogi, monarchE Committee Members and Investigators

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) will not experience recurrence or have distant recurrence with currently available standard therapies. However, up to 30% of patients with high-risk clinical and/or pathologic features may experience distant recurrence, many in the first few years. Superior treatment options are needed to prevent early recurrence and development of metastases for this group of patients. Abemaciclib is an oral, continuously dosed, CDK4/6 inhibitor approved for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in ABC supported evaluation in the adjuvant setting.

Methods: This open-label, phase III study included patients with HR+, HER2-, high-risk EBC, who had surgery and, as indicated, radiotherapy and/or adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with four or more positive nodes, or one to three nodes and either tumor size ≥ 5 cm, histologic grade 3, or central Ki-67 ≥ 20%, were eligible and randomly assigned (1:1) to standard-of-care adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) with or without abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily for 2 years). The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), and secondary end points included distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

Results: At a preplanned efficacy interim analysis, among 5,637 randomly assigned patients, 323 IDFS events were observed in the intent-to-treat population. Abemaciclib plus ET demonstrated superior IDFS versus ET alone (P = .01; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93), with 2-year IDFS rates of 92.2% versus 88.7%, respectively. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.

Conclusion: Abemaciclib when combined with ET is the first CDK4/6 inhibitor to demonstrate a significant improvement in IDFS in patients with HR+, HER2- node-positive EBC at high risk of early recurrence.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03155997.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. (a) Four patients randomly assigned to the abemaciclib arm only received endocrine therapy (ET) and were evaluated for safety in the control arm. (b) One patient randomly assigned to the control arm received abemaciclib and was evaluated for safety in the abemaciclib arm.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). (A) Kaplan-Meier curves of IDFS and IDFS zoomed in to better visualize separation of the curves in the intent-to-treat population. (B) IDFS of patient subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) are stratified in overall population and unstratified in subgroups for abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone. HR estimates for IDFS are indicated by diamonds, and 95% CIs are indicated by the crossing horizontal lines. (a) Curves should not be interpreted beyond 24 months because of the limited follow-up. (b) If a subgroup consists of < 5% of randomly assigned patients, analysis within that subgroup was omitted. (c) The width of CIs in subgroups has not been adjusted for multiplicity; thus, the subgroup results are exploratory in nature. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Distant relapse–free survival (DRFS). (A) Kaplan-Meier curves of DRFS and DRFS zoomed in to better visualize separation of the curves in the intent-to-treat population. (B) DRFS of patient subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) are stratified in overall population and unstratified in subgroups for abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone. HR estimates for DRFS are indicated by diamonds, and 95% CIs are indicated by the crossing horizontal lines. (a) Curves should not be interpreted beyond 24 months because of the limited follow-up. (b) If a subgroup consists of < 5% of randomly assigned patients, analysis within that subgroup was omitted. (c) The width of CIs in subgroups has not been adjusted for multiplicity; thus, the subgroup results are exploratory in nature. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

References

    1. Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, et al: US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju055, 2014.
    1. Cardoso F Spence D Mertz S, et al. : Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Decade report (2005-2015). Breast 39:131-138, 2018
    1. Senkus E Kyriakides S Ohno S, et al. : Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 26:v8-v30, 2015. (suppl 5)
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Breast Cancer (version 4.2020). .
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) : Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: Patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 386:1341-1352, 2015
    1. Mamounas EP Tang G Paik S, et al. : 21-Gene Recurrence Score for prognosis and prediction of taxane benefit after adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy: Results from NSABP B-28/NRG Oncology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:69-77, 2018
    1. Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al: The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy-MONARCH 2: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 6:116-124, 2019.
    1. Sledge GW Jr Toi M Neven P, et al. : MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 35:2875-2884, 2017
    1. Goetz MP Toi M Campone M, et al. : MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:3638-3646, 2017
    1. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0097-z. Johnston S, Martin M, Di Leo A, et al: MONARCH 3 final PFS: A randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 5, 2019, doi:
    1. Cardoso F van’t Veer LJ Bogaerts J, et al. : 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717-729, 2016
    1. Gluz O Nitz UA Christgen M, et al. : West German Study Group phase III planB trial: First prospective outcome data for the 21-gene recurrence score assay and concordance of prognostic markers by central and local pathology assessment. J Clin Oncol 34:2341-2349, 2016
    1. Marmé F Lederer B Blohmer JU, et al. : Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 53:65-74, 2016
    1. Hammond ME Hayes DF Wolff AC, et al. : American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 6:195-197, 2010
    1. Wolff AC Hammond MEH Allison KH, et al. : Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol 36:2105-2122, 2018
    1. Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trialists’ Group, Forbes JF Cuzick J, et al. : Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 100-month analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol 9:45-53, 2008
    1. Hudis CA Barlow WE Costantino JP, et al. : Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: The STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25:2127-2132, 2007
    1. Cardoso F Senkus E Costa A, et al. : 4th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 29:1634-1657, 2018
    1. Dickler MN Tolaney SM Rugo HS, et al. : MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:5218-5224, 2017
    1. Johnston S Puhalla S Wheatley D, et al. : Randomized phase II study evaluating palbociclib in addition to letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: PALLET Trial. J Clin Oncol 37:178-189, 2019

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다