Venepuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates

Vibhuti S Shah, Arne Ohlsson, Vibhuti S Shah, Arne Ohlsson

Abstract

Background: Heel lance has been the conventional method of blood sampling in neonates for screening tests. Neonates undergoing heel lance experience pain which cannot be completely alleviated.

Objectives: To determine whether venepuncture or heel lance is less painful and more effective for blood sampling in term neonates.

Search strategy: Randomized or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing pain response to venepuncture versus heel lance were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Regsiter of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and clinical trials registries in May 2011.

Selection criteria: Trials comparing pain response to venepuncture versus heel lance with or with out the use of a sweet tasting solution as a co-intervention in term neonates.

Data collection and analysis: Outcomes included pain response to venepuncture versus heel lance with or without the use of a sweet tasting solution using validated pain measures, the need of repeat sampling and cry characteristics. Analyses included typical relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT), weighted mean difference (WMD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Between study heterogeneity was reported including the I squared (I(2)) test.

Main results: Six studies (n = 478) of variable quality were included. A composite outcome of Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), Neonatal Facial Action Coding System (NFCS) and/or Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score was reported in 288 infants, who did not receive a sweet tasting solution. Meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in the venepuncture versus the heel lance group (SMD -0.76, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.52; I(2) = 0%). When a sweet tasting solution was provided the SMD remained significant favouring the venepuncture group (SMD - 0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.07). The typical RD for requiring more than one skin puncture for venepuncture versus heel lance (reported in 4 studies; n = 254) was -0.34 (95% CI -0.43 to -0.25; I(2) = 97%). The NNT to avoid one repeat skin puncture was 3 (95% CI 2 to 4). Cry characteristics favoured the venepuncture group but the differences were reduced by the provision of sweet tasting solutions prior to either procedure.

Authors' conclusions: Venepuncture, when performed by a skilled phlebotomist, appears to be the method of choice for blood sampling in term neonates. The use of a sweet tasting solution further reduces the pain.Further well designed randomised controlled trials should be conducted in settings where several individuals perform the procedures.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Vibhuti Shah is the principal author of one of the included trials in this review (Shah 1997).

Figures

1
1
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Pain response to VP VS HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, outcome: 1.1 Behavioural pain scores for VP VS HL.
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP VS HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, outcome: 2.1 Behavioural pain scores for VP vs. HL.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 1 Behavioural pain scores for VP vs. HL.
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 2 Duration of first cry (seconds).
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 3 Total duration of cry (seconds).
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 4 Number of neonates who cried during the procedure.
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 5 First crying time (seconds)/total procedure time (seconds) (%).
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 6 Duration of cry in the first three minutes after skin puncture.
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 7 Sampling time (seconds).
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 8 Need for more than one skin puncture.
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 9 Need for more than two skin punctures.
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 10 Brusing/hematoma at local site.
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 11 Maternal anxiety score prior to the procedure.
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who did not receive a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 12 Infant's pain score as rated by the mother.
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 1 Behavioural pain scores for VP vs. HL.
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 2 Durration of first cry (seconds).
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 3 Total duration of cry (seconds).
2.4. Analysis
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 4 Number of neonates who cried during the procedure.
2.5. Analysis
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 5 First crying time (seconds)/total procedure time (seconds) %.
2.6. Analysis
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 6 Duration of cry in the first three minutes (seconds).
2.7. Analysis
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 7 Sampliing time (seconds).
2.8. Analysis
2.8. Analysis
Comparison 2 Pain response during skin puncture to VP vs. HL in infants who received a sweet tasting solution, Outcome 8 Need for more than one skin puncture.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다