Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty : 5-Year Results of the Randomized Controlled EffPac Trial

Ulf Teichgräber, Thomas Lehmann, Maja Ingwersen, René Aschenbach, Thomas Zeller, Klaus Brechtel, Erwin Blessing, Michael Lichtenberg, Peter von Flotow, Britta Heilmeier, Sebastian Sixt, Steffen Brucks, Christian Erbel, Ulrich Beschorner, Michael Werk, Vicenç Riambau, Andreas Wienke, Christof Klumb, Markus Thieme, Dierk Scheinert, Ulf Teichgräber, Thomas Lehmann, Maja Ingwersen, René Aschenbach, Thomas Zeller, Klaus Brechtel, Erwin Blessing, Michael Lichtenberg, Peter von Flotow, Britta Heilmeier, Sebastian Sixt, Steffen Brucks, Christian Erbel, Ulrich Beschorner, Michael Werk, Vicenç Riambau, Andreas Wienke, Christof Klumb, Markus Thieme, Dierk Scheinert

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of femoropopliteal angioplasty with the Luminor® 35 drug-coated balloon (DCB).

Materials and methods: The EffPac trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 171 patients of Rutherford category 2 to 4 with medium length femoropopliteal lesions. Patients were allocated 1:1 to either Luminor® 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). Assessment at 5 years included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), clinical improvement, and target limb amputation. Long-term vital status was ascertained in 97.1% of the participants.

Results: Kaplan-Meier curves at 5 years demonstrate a primary patency of 61.4% after DCB angioplasty and 53.5% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.040) with a decreasing difference throughout the observation period. Freedom from TLR was 82.1% and 73.7%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.050). Incidence of primary clinical improvement was similar between groups (61% DCB vs. 64% POBA, p = 0.94). Major target limb amputation was necessary in one POBA-group participant. Freedom from all-cause death at 5 years was 88.5% after DCB and 86.0% after POBA (log-rank p = 0.34).

Conclusions: Primary patency after femoropopliteal DCB angioplasty remained superior to POBA throughout 5 years, however, with decreasing difference. Clinical improvement, freedom from TLR, and all-cause mortality were similar between groups over the long term. (Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Coated Luminor® Balloon Catheter Versus Uncoated Balloon Catheter in the Superficial Femoral Artery [EffPac]; NCT02540018).

Keywords: Angioplasty; Drug-coated balloon; Femoropopliteal; Paclitaxel.

Conflict of interest statement

UT is a consultant for iVascular. TZ is co-principal investigator of the ILICO study, a study sponsored by iVascular. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to this article.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow in the EffPac trial through the 5-year follow-up. One hundred seventy-one patients were randomized 1:1 into groups that underwent Luminor 35 DCB angioplasty or plain old balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions and were followed up through 60 months. Withdrawal was due to withdrawal of consent or to other reasons for loss to follow up DCB drug-coated balloon, DUS duplex ultrasonography, POBA plain old balloon angioplasty
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Treatment effect of Luminor 35 DCB angioplasty in femoropopliteal lesions through 5 years. A Primary patency at 5 years was achieved significantly more often with Luminor 35 DCB angioplasty than with standard balloon angioplasty and B freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization did not differ significantly between groups. At 60 months, standard error was 6.9% and 6.4% for primary patency and 5.2% and 5.5% for CD-TLR in the DCB and POBA group, respectively. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. DCB drug-coated balloon, POBA plain old balloon angioplasty, CD-TLR clinically driven target lesion revascularization
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Post-hoc analysis of loss of primary patency by subgroups. Hazard ratios were determined over a period of 5 years and adjusted for study centers. The dotted line shows the no-effect point and the continuous line the overall treatment effect. DCB drug-coated balloon, CTO chronic total occlusion, POBA plain old balloon angioplasty
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Clinical improvement according to Rutherford classification. A Change in Rutherford category from baseline to follow-ups (participants who underwent TLR included), and B clinical improvement at 5 years. The boxed p-values concern differences in change from baseline between the DCB and the POBA group. Primary clinical improvement applied if the Rutherford category declined by at least one level without preceding target lesion revascularization. DCB drug-coated balloon, POBA plain old balloon angioplasty, TLR target lesion revascularization
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Survival through 5 years. Kaplan–Meier curves show freedom from all-cause death after Luminor 35 DCB angioplasty or standard balloon angioplasty through 5 years. At 60 months, standard error was 3.6% and 3.8% in the DCB and POBA group, respectively. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. DCB drug-coated balloon, POBA plain old balloon angioplasty

References

    1. Teichgräber U, Aschenbach R, Scheinert D, et al. The effectiveness of the paclitaxel-coated Luminor® balloon catheter versus an uncoated balloon catheter in superficial femoral and popliteal arteries in preventing vessel restenosis or reocclusion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1657-x.
    1. Caradu C, Lakhlifi E, Colacchio EC, et al. Systematic review and updated meta-analysis of the use of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):981–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.080.
    1. Klumb C, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, Eckardt N, Teichgräber U. Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;16:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.09.004.
    1. Rocha-Singh KJ, Duval S, Jaff MR, et al. Mortality and paclitaxel-coated devices: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Circulation. 2020;141(23):1859–1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044697.
    1. Rocha-Singh KJ, Duval S. Statistical alchemy and the road ahead. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(24):2525–2527. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.013.
    1. Tepe G, Schnorr B, Albrecht T, et al. Angioplasty of femoral-popliteal arteries with drug-coated balloons: 5-year follow-up of the THUNDER trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (1 Pt A) 2015;8:102–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.023.
    1. Laird JA, Schneider PA, Jaff MR, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of a drug-coated balloon for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(6):e007702. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007702.
    1. Xu Y, Liu J, Zhang J, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery disease with drug-coated balloons from the AcoArt I trial. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(3):756–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.041.
    1. Ouriel K, Adelman MA, Rosenfield K, et al. Safety of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(24):2515–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025.
    1. Teichgräber U, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R et al. efficacy and safety of a novel paclitaxel-nano-coated balloon for femoro-popliteal angioplasty: 1-Year Results of EffPac Trial. EuroInterventiom. 2019.
    1. Teichgräber U, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. Two-year review on mortality and morbidity after femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon angioplasty in the randomized EffPac trial. Radiology. 2020;296(3):638–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201370.
    1. Teichgräber U, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty of Femoropopliteal Lesions Maintained Superior Efficacy over Conventional Balloon: 2-year Results of the Randomized EffPac Trial. Radiology. 2020;16:191619.
    1. Zeller T, Brodmann M, Ansel GM et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloons for femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease: final five-year results of the IN.PACT Global Study. EuroIntervention. 2022.
    1. Teichgräber U, Lehmann T, Aschenbach R, et al. Femoropopliteal Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty: Long-term Results of the Randomized EffPac Trial. Radiology. 2022;304(1):225–7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212622.
    1. Faenger B, Heinrich A, Hilger I, Teichgräber U. drug loss from paclitaxel-coated balloons during preparation, insertion and inflation for angioplasty: a laboratory investigation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022;1–12
    1. Heinrich A, Engler MS, Güttler FV, Matthäus C, Popp J, Teichgräber UK. Systematic evaluation of particle loss during handling in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for eight different drug-coated balloons. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17220. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74227-1.
    1. Torii S, Jinnouchi H, Sakamoto A, et al. Comparison of biologic effect and particulate embolization after femoral artery treatment with three drug-coated balloons in healthy swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(1):103–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.025.
    1. Tang TY, Sulaiman MSB, Soon SXY, Yap CJQ, Patel A, Chong TT. Slow-flow phenomena following lower limb paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty in the setting of chronic limb threatening ischaemia-a case series. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022;12(3):2058–65. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-633.
    1. Shirai S, Hirano K, Mori S, et al. Frequency, predictors, and effect of the slow-flow phenomenon after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions. Heart Vessels. 2021;36(12):1818–24. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01871-6.
    1. Freisinger E, Koeppe J, Gerss J, et al. Mortality after use of paclitaxel-based devices in peripheral arteries: a real-world safety analysis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(38):3732–3739. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz698.
    1. Secemsky EA, Barrette E, Bockstedt L, et al. Long-term safety of drug-coated devices for peripheral revascularisation. EuroIntervention. 2021;17(7):590–598. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01018.
    1. Nordanstig J, James S, Andersson M, et al. Mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices in peripheral artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(26):2538–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005206.
    1. Dinh K, Limmer AM, Chen AZL, et al. Mortality rates after paclitaxel-coated device use in patients with occlusive femoropopliteal disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(5):755–77. doi: 10.1177/15266028211023505.
    1. Sgueglia GA, Cortese B, Gaspardone A. Late catch-up phenomenon after drug-eluting balloon angioplasty. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):638–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.175.
    1. Speck U, Cremers B, Kelsch B, et al. Do pharmacokinetics explain persistent restenosis inhibition by a single dose of paclitaxel? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(3):392–400. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967794.
    1. Mietz S, Lehmann T, Teichgräber U. Multivariable regression analysis of clinical data from the randomized-controlled EffPac trial: efficacy of femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2020;43(6):840–849. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02452-2.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다