Influence of dietary protein on postprandial blood glucose levels in individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus using intensive insulin therapy

M A Paterson, C E M Smart, P E Lopez, P McElduff, J Attia, C Morbey, B R King, M A Paterson, C E M Smart, P E Lopez, P McElduff, J Attia, C Morbey, B R King

Abstract

Aim: To determine the effects of protein alone (independent of fat and carbohydrate) on postprandial glycaemia in individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus using intensive insulin therapy.

Methods: Participants with Type 1 diabetes mellitus aged 7-40 years consumed six 150 ml whey isolate protein drinks [0 g (control), 12.5, 25, 50, 75 and 100] and two 150 ml glucose drinks (10 and 20 g) without insulin, in randomized order over 8 days, 4 h after the evening meal. Continuous glucose monitoring was used to assess postprandial glycaemia.

Results: Data were collected from 27 participants. Protein loads of 12.5 and 50 g did not result in significant postprandial glycaemic excursions compared with control (water) throughout the 300 min study period (P > 0.05). Protein loads of 75 and 100 g resulted in lower glycaemic excursions than control in the 60-120 min postprandial interval, but higher excursions in the 180-300 min interval. In comparison with 20 g glucose, the large protein loads resulted in significantly delayed and sustained glucose excursions, commencing at 180 min and continuing to 5 h.

Conclusions: Seventy-five grams or more of protein alone significantly increases postprandial glycaemia from 3 to 5 h in people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus using intensive insulin therapy. The glycaemic profiles resulting from high protein loads differ significantly from the excursion from glucose in terms of time to peak glucose and duration of the glycaemic excursion. This research supports recommendations for insulin dosing for large amounts of protein.

© 2015 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram showing the attrition of participants from recruitment to data analysis. 55 participants were assessed for eligibility. 32 participants were randomized with 5 participants withdrawing from the intervention. A total of 211 study days were analysed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean postprandial glycaemic excursions for 27 participants following consumption of 8 test drinks containing 0, 12.5, 25, 50, 75 and 100 g of protein; with two glucose (CHO) test drinks given for comparison, in amounts of 10 and 20 g without insulin. Compared with 0, 75 and 100 g protein loads produced significantly higher glycaemic excursions from 180‐240 min (P = 0.002) and 240–300 min (P < 0.001). Glucose levels from 75 and 100 g protein were similar to that of 20 g CHO given without insulin however the shape of the response was different. CHO, carbohydrate.

References

    1. Boland E, Monsod T, Delucia M, Brandt CA, Fernando S, Tamborlane WV. Limitations of conventional methods of self‐monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1858–1862.
    1. MacDonald K, Lowe JM, Barker D, Mensch M, Attia J. Effect of popular takeaway foods on blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients on intensive insulin therapy. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63: 189–194.
    1. Ann Ahern J, Gatcomb PM, Held NA, Petit WA, Tamborlane WV. Exaggerated hyperglycemia after a pizza meal in well‐controlled diabetes. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 578–580.
    1. Brownlee M, Hirsch IB. Glycaemic variability: a hemaglobin A1c‐independent risk factor for diabetic complications. JAMA 2006; 295: 1707–1708.
    1. Hirsch IB, Brownlee M. Should minimal glucose variabilty become the gold standard of glycaemic control? J Diabetes Complicat 2005; 19: 178–181.
    1. American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2014. Diabetes Care 2014; 37(Suppl 1): S14–S80.
    1. Rabasa‐Lhoret R, Garon J, Langelier H, Poisson D, Chiasson JL. Effects of meal carbohydrate content on insulin requirements in type 1 diabetic patients treated intensively with the basal–bolus (ultralente–regular) insulin regimen. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 667–673.
    1. Peters AL, Davidson MB. Protein and fat effects on glucose responses and insulin requirements in subjects with insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 58: 555–560.
    1. Winiger G, Keller U, Laager R, Girard J, Berger W. Protein content of the evening meal and nocturnal plasma glucose reglulation in Type 1 diabetic subjects. Horm Res 1995; 44: 101–104.
    1. Pankowska E, Blazik M, Groele L. Does the fat–protein meal increase postprandial glucose level in type 1 diabetes patients on insulin pump: the conclusion of a randomized study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012; 14: 16–22.
    1. Smart CE, Evans M, O'Connell SM, McElduff P, Lopez PE, Jones TW et al Both dietary protein and fat increase postprandial glucose excursions in children with type 1 diabetes, and the effect is additive. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 3897–3902.
    1. Pańkowska E, Szypowska A, Lipka M, Szpotańska M, Błazik M, Groele L. Application of novel dual wave meal bolus and its impact on glycated hemoglobin A1c level in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2009; 10: 298–303.
    1. Kordonouri O, Hartmann R, Remus K, Bläsig S, Sadeghian E, Danne T. Benefit of supplementary fat plus protein counting as compared with conventional carbohydrate counting for insulin bolus calculation in children with pump therapy. Pediatr Diabetes 2012; 13: 540–544.
    1. World Health Organization . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: i–xii, 1–253.
    1. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243.
    1. Trip Advisor . Best steakhouses in London 2013. Available at Last accessed 3 July 2013.
    1. Calorie King Australia . Calories in rump steak 2015. Available at Last accessed 3 July 2015.
    1. Smart CE, King B, McElduff P, Collins C. In children using intensive insulin therapy, a 20 g variation in carbohydrate amount significantly impacts on postprandial glycemia. Diabet Med 2012; 29: e21–e24.
    1. Janney NW, Blatherwick NR. The metabolic relationship to glucose. J Biol Chem 1915; 20: 321–350.
    1. Khan MA, Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ. Glucose appearance rate following protein ingestion in normal subjects. J Am Coll Nutr 1992; 11: 701–706.
    1. Lee SW, Cao M, Sajid S, Hayes M, Choi L, Rother C et al The dual‐wave bolus feature in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps controls prolonged post‐prandial hyperglycaemia better than standard bolus in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2004; 17: 211–216.
    1. Chase HP, Saib SZ, MacKenzie T, Hansen MM, Garg SK. Post‐prandial glucose excursions following four methods of bolus insulin administration in subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 317–321.
    1. O'Connell MA, Gilbertson HR, Donath SM, Cameron FJ. Optimizing postprandial glycemia in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy: impact of glycemic index and prandial bolus type. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1491–1495.
    1. Kalergis M, Schiffrin A, Gougeon R, Jones PJH, Yale J‐F. Impact of bedtime snack composition on prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia in adults with Type 1 diabetes undergoing intensive insulin management using lispro insulin before meals: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 9–15.
    1. Uthoff H, Lehmann R, Sprenger M, Wiesli P. Skipping meals or carbohydrate‐free meals in order to determine basal insulin requirements in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus? Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2010; 118: 325–327.
    1. Unger RH, Orci L. Physiology and pathophysiology of glucagon. Physiol Rev 1976; 56: 778–826.
    1. Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ, Lane JT, Burmeister LA. Metabolic response to cottage cheese or egg white protein, with or without glucose, in type II diabetic subjects. Metabolism 1992; 41: 1137–1145.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다