Tadalafil Enhances Immune Signatures in Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Adam J Luginbuhl, Jennifer M Johnson, Larry A Harshyne, Alban J Linnenbach, Sanket K Shukla, Angela Alnemri, Gaurav Kumar, David M Cognetti, Joseph M Curry, Nikita Kotlov, Zoya Antysheva, Sandrine Degryse, Kyle Mannion, Michael K Gibson, James Netterville, Brandee Brown, Rita Axelrod, Ralph Zinner, Madalina Tuluc, Stacey Gargano, Benjamin E Leiby, Ayako Shimada, My G Mahoney, Ubaldo Martinez-Outschoorn, Ulrich Rodeck, Young J Kim, Andrew P South, Athanassios Argiris, Adam J Luginbuhl, Jennifer M Johnson, Larry A Harshyne, Alban J Linnenbach, Sanket K Shukla, Angela Alnemri, Gaurav Kumar, David M Cognetti, Joseph M Curry, Nikita Kotlov, Zoya Antysheva, Sandrine Degryse, Kyle Mannion, Michael K Gibson, James Netterville, Brandee Brown, Rita Axelrod, Ralph Zinner, Madalina Tuluc, Stacey Gargano, Benjamin E Leiby, Ayako Shimada, My G Mahoney, Ubaldo Martinez-Outschoorn, Ulrich Rodeck, Young J Kim, Andrew P South, Athanassios Argiris

Abstract

Purpose: We hypothesize that the addition of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil to the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, is safe and will augment immune-mediated antitumor responses in previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).

Patients and methods: We conducted a two-arm multi-institutional neoadjuvant randomized trial in any-stage resectable HNSCC (NCT03238365). Patients were stratified at randomization by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Patients in both arms received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously on days 1 and 15 followed by surgery on day 28. Those in the combination therapy arm also received tadalafil 10 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks. Imaging, blood, and tumor were obtained pretreatment and posttreatment for correlative analysis.

Results: Neoadjuvant therapy was well-tolerated with no grade 3 to 5 adverse events and no surgical delays. Twenty-five of 46 (54%) evaluable patients had a pathologic treatment response of ≥20%, including three (7%) patients with a complete pathologic response. Regardless of HPV status, tumor proliferation rate was a negative predictor of response. A strong pretreatment T-cell signature in the HPV-negative cohort was a predictor of response. Tadalafil altered the immune microenvironment, as evidenced by transcriptome data identifying enriched B- and natural killer cell gene sets in the tumor and augmented effector T cells in the periphery.

Conclusions: Preoperative nivolumab ± tadalafil is safe in HNSCC and results in more than 50% of the patients having a pathologic treatment response of at least 20% after 4 weeks of treatment. Pretreatment specimens identified HPV status-dependent signatures that predicted response to immunotherapy while posttreatment specimens showed augmentation of the immune microenvironment with the addition of tadalafil.

©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trial schema and overall response. A, Trial schema. B, Example of radiographic and pathologic representation of treatment response. A 6-cm pretreatment lymph node decreased to 3.4 cm posttreatment and on final pathology had 95% pTR with only 5% viable tumor in the lymph node (yellow arrow). C, Waterfall plot of overall pTR by treatment group and HPV status at time of surgery. Threshold of ≥20% was considered a “responder” in the correlative analysis. Analysis of tumor tissue used pTR at the primary site only. Analysis of PBMCs used overall pTR including primary and lymph nodes. OC, oral cavity; HP, hypopharynx; NC, nasal cavity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
HPV− Rs have increased pretreatment T-cell abundance. A, Pretreatment biopsy CD8+ T-cell RNA signature did not demonstrate significance between Rs and NRs. Subgroup analysis with respect to HPV status reveals the HPV− cohort having a significant difference in overall T cells, Tregs, CD8, and CD4 that is not identified in the HPV+ cohort. Pretreatment CD8, FoxP3, and CD163 IHC confirm a significant difference for HPV−but not positive tumors pointing to an immune desert as a significant correlate of nonresponse. B, Quantitation by RNA-seq of PD-L1 and semiquantification by PD-L1 IHC staining demonstrating no predictive significance for response (left graph, y-axis shows log2 expression). In pre- to posttreatment samples PD-L1 staining remained stable in the NRs and trended upward in the Rs (right graph). C, High tumor proliferation rate signatures in the pretreatment samples are associated with nonresponse. The tumor proliferation signature consists of cell cycle– and tumor progression–associated genes.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood cell subsets shows that Rs have different pretreatment peripheral compartments that support cytotoxic T cells. Scatter graphs depict representative subjects with numbers indicating the percentage of cells within a given gate. Graphs show NRs and Rs baseline pretreatment values compared with posttreatment nivolumab versus nivolumab + tadalafil. Rs demonstrated a greater CD8:CD4 ratio in the periphery with the tadalafil cohort significantly augmenting this ratio after treatment regardless of response. In pretreatment samples, B lymphocytes are increased. Peripheral PD-L1 levels and CD163 macrophages are significantly decreased in Rs compared with the NRs, suggesting the peripheral compartment plays role in treatment response. Statistical significance was assessed using ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0005). Nivo, nivolumab; Tad, tadalafil.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
HPV+ tumors demonstrate the greatest overall immune-related transcriptomic change with the addition of tadalafil. A, Heatmap showing expression of a set of 292 immune signature genes comparing pre- and posttreatment separated out by HPV status and treatment cohort regardless of response. Individual genes (demarcated by rows) are subdivided based on immune cell association (vertical legend). Each column represents a cohort prior to treatment or following treatment. B, Gene signatures demonstrate dynamic changes caused by tadalafil in the B-cell population, with upward trend in the T-cell population and no effect on CAFs. *P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. Nivo, nivolumab; Tad, tadalafil.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Unbiased GSEA of bulk RNA sequences, indicating enrichment of B- and NK-cell gene sets in Rs to nivolumab and tadalafil. A, Enrichment plots and heat maps. Top, left: Result from a canonical pathway collection (C2 cp) query showing enrichment of CD22-mediated B-cell antigen receptor regulation in HPV− and HPV+ Rs, posttreatment. Top, right: Cell-type signature (C8) query revealing enrichment of B cells. Heatmaps show the 12-most upregulated genes, posttreatment. Bottom, left: Cell-type signature collection (C8) query illustrating enrichment of an NK-cell gene set in HPV− and HPV+ Rs. Bottom, right: Enrichment of a second NK-cell gene set, with portions of heatmaps. B, Scatter plots of normalized transcript counts from bulk RNA sequence data. Top: Expression of B-cell genes, selected from heat maps in panel A. Enrichment, posttreatment, manifested in the 20% to 100% pTR group that received nivolumab + tadalafil (left; one-way ANOVA; P < 0.0001), but not nivolumab-alone (right). Bottom: Similarly, a subset of five NK-cell genes were found to be enriched by tadalafil in the 20% to 100% pTR group, posttreatment (one-way ANOVA; P = 0.0003). C, Venn diagram of the GSEA leading edges and table of the 66 genes of an NK-cell signature unique to the tadalafil group. NS, not significant.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Flow cytometric analysis of exosomes in pre- and posttreatment plasma and supernatants from short-term ex vivo tumor cell cultures identified increase exosomes in NRs. A, Gating strategies for single events (left) and exosomes (right). B, The frequency of circulating exosomes in pretreatment plasma (n = 41; left) and overnight biopsy cultures (n = 23; right) as they relate to clinical response. Statistical significance was assessed using ANOVA (*P = 0.03). C, Bar charts show expression of immune checkpoint receptors on exosomes present in posttreatment tumor culture supernatant as they relate to clinical response (n = 23). Statistical significance was assessed using Student t test (*P < 0.05). Exo, exomes; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; FSC-A, Forward scatter area; FSC-H, forward scatter height; DiO, 3,3′-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine; TCS, tumor culture supernatant.

References

    1. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. . Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1856–67.
    1. Seiwert TY, Burtness B, Mehra R, Weiss J, Berger R, Eder JP, et al. . Safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab for treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-012): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:956–65.
    1. Cohen EEW, Soulières D, Tourneau CL, Dinis J, Ahn M-J, Soria A, et al. . Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet North Am Ed 2019;393:156–67.
    1. Schoenfeld JD, Hanna GJ, Jo VY, Rawal B, Chen Y-H, Catalano PS, et al. . Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in untreated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 2 open-label randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1563–70.
    1. Uppaluri R, Campbell KM, Egloff AM, Zolkind P, Skidmore ZL, Nussenbaum B, et al. . Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab in resectable locally advanced, human papillomavirus-unrelated head and neck cancer: a multicenter, phase 2 trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:5140–52.
    1. Ferrarotto R, Bell D, Rubin ML, Hutcheson KA, Johnson JM, Goepfert RP, et al. . Impact of Neoadjuvant Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab on CD8+ tumor lymphocyte density, safety, and efficacy in patients with oropharynx cancer: CIAO trial results. Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:3211–9.
    1. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, et al. . Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019;394:1915–28.
    1. Dos Santos LV, Abrahão CM, William WN Jr. Overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Front Oncol 2021;11:596290.
    1. Topalian SL, Taube JM, Pardoll DM. Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Science 2020;367:eaax0182–11.
    1. Liu J, Blake SJ, Yong MCR, Harjunpää H, Ngiow SF, Takeda K, et al. . Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. Cancer Discov 2016;6:1382–99.
    1. Jia X-H, Xu H, Geng L-Y, Jiao M, Wang W-J, Jiang L-L, et al. . Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable nonsmall cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2020;147:143–53.
    1. Chalabi M, Fanchi LF, Dijkstra KK, Van den Berg JG, Aalbers AG, Sikorska K, et al. . Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers. Nat Med 2020;26:566–76.
    1. Ferris RL, Spanos WC, Leidner R, Gonçalves A, Martens UM, Kyi C, et al. . Neoadjuvant nivolumab for patients with resectable HPV-positive and HPV-negative squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in the CheckMate 358 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9:e002568.
    1. Uppaluri R, Chernock R, Mansour M, Jackson R, Rich J, Pipkorn P, et al. . Enhanced pathologic tumor response with two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in surgically resectable, locally advanced HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:6008.
    1. Terrett NK, Bell AS, Brown D, Ellis P. Sildenafil (VIAGRATM), a potent and selective inhibitor of type 5 cGMP phosphodiesterase with utility for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1996;6:1819–24.
    1. Noonan KA, Ghosh N, Rudraraju L, Bui M, Borrello I. Targeting immune suppression with PDE5 inhibition in end-stage multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunol Res 2014;2:725–31.
    1. Califano JA, Khan Z, Noonan KA, Rudraraju L, Zhang Z, Wang H, et al. . Tadalafil augments tumor specific immunity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:30–8.
    1. Weed DT, Vella JL, Reis IM, De la Fuente AC, Gomez C, Sargi Z, et al. . Tadalafil reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells and promotes tumor immunity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:39–48.
    1. Weed DT, Zilio S, Reis IM, Sargi Z, Abouyared M, Gomez-Fernandez CR, et al. . The reversal of immune exclusion mediated by tadalafil and an anti-tumor vaccine also induces PDL1 upregulation in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: interim analysis of a phase I clinical trial. Front Immunol 2019;10:1206.
    1. Serafini P, Meckel K, Kelso M, Noonan K, Califano J, Koch W, et al. . Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition augments endogenous antitumor immunity by reducing myeloid-derived suppressor cell function. J Exp Med 2006;203:2691–702.
    1. Thall PF, Simon R. Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. Biometrics 1994;50:337–49.
    1. Merlino DJ, Johnson JM, Tuluc M, Gargano S, Stapp R, Harshyne L, et al. . Discordant responses between primary head and neck tumors and nodal metastases treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab: correlation of radiographic and pathologic treatment effect. Front Oncol 2020;10:566315.
    1. Frelaut M, Tourneau CL, Borcoman E. Hyperprogression under immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:2674.
    1. Bagaev A, Kotlov N, Nomie K, Svekolkin V, Gafurov A, Isaeva O, et al. . Conserved pan-cancer microenvironment subtypes predict response to immunotherapy. Cancer Cell 2021;39:845–65.
    1. Zaytcev A, Chelushkin M, Nuzhdina K, Bagaev A, Dyykanov D, Zyrin V, et al. . Abstract 853: Novel machine learning based deconvolution algorithm results in accurate description of tumor microenvironment from bulk RNAseq. Clin Res Exclud Clin Trials 2020;853.
    1. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545–50.
    1. Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst 2015;1:417–25.
    1. Aizarani N, Saviano A, Sagar, Mailly L, Durand S, Herman JS, et al. . A human liver cell atlas revealsng heterogeneity and epithelial progenitors. Nature 2019;572:199–204.
    1. Zhou X, Yao Z, Yang H, Liang N, Zhang X, Zhang F. Are immune-related adverse events associated with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmc Med 2020;18:87.
    1. Cortellini A, Chiari R, Ricciuti B, Metro G, Perrone F, Tiseo M, et al. . Correlations between the immune-related adverse events spectrum and efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Clin Lung Cancer 2019;20:237–47.
    1. Foster CC, Kochanny S, Khattri A, Acharya R, Dekker A, Carol Tan Y-H, et al. . Association of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with improved response, progression-free survival, and overall survival for patients with metastatic head and neck cancer receviing anti-PD-1 therapy. J Clin Oncol 36:15s, 2018(suppl; abstr 6014).
    1. Matsuo M, Yasumatsu R, Masuda M, Toh S, Wakasaki T, Hashimoto K, et al. . Relationship between immune-related adverse events and the long-term outcomes in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. Oral Oncol 2020;101:104525.
    1. Chen DS, Mellman I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer–immune set point. Nature 2017;541:321–30.
    1. Aggarwal C, Cohen RB, Morrow MP, Kraynak KA, Sylvester AJ, Knoblock DM, et al. . Immunotherapy targeting HPV16/18 generates potent immune responses in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25:110–24.
    1. Li W, Matakidou A, Ghazoui Z, Si H, Wildsmith S, Morsli N, et al. . Molecular biomarkers to identify patients (pts) who may benefit from durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) ± tremelimumab (T; anti-CTLA-4) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) from HAWK and CONDOR studies. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:6548.
    1. Wang J, Sun H, Zeng Q, Guo X-J, Wang H, Liu H-H, et al. . HPV-positive status associated with inflamed immune microenvironment and improved response to anti-PD-1 therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2019;9:13404.
    1. Wise-Draper TM, Takiar V, Mierzwa ML, Casper K, Palackdharry S, Worden FP, et al. . Association of pathological response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with tumor PD-L1 expression and high disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resectable, local-regionally advanced, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). J Clin Oncol 2021;39:6006.
    1. Huang C, Chen L, Savage SR, Eguez RV, Dou Y, Li Y, et al. . Proteogenomic insights into the biology and treatment of HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2021;20:1295.
    1. Schroeder JC, Puntigam L, Hofmann L, Jeske SS, Beccard IJ, Doescher J, et al. . Circulating exosomes inhibit B cell proliferation and activity. Cancers. 2020;12:2110.
    1. Harshyne LA, Nasca BJ, Kenyon LC, Andrews DW, Hooper DC. Serum exosomes and cytokines promote a T-helper cell type 2 environment in the peripheral blood of glioblastoma patients. Neuro-oncol 2015;nov107.
    1. Miyazaki T, Maiti M, Hennessy M, Chang T, Kuo P, Addepalli M, et al. . NKTR-255, a novel polymer-conjugated rhIL-15 with potent antitumor efficacy. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9:e002024.
    1. Hassel JC, Jiang H, Bender C, Winkler J, Sevko A, Shevchenko I, et al. . Tadalafil has biologic activity in human melanoma. Results of a pilot trial with Tadalafil in patients with metastatic Melanoma (TaMe). Oncoimmunology 2017;6:e1326440.
    1. Sutton SS, Magagnoli J, Cummings TH, Hardin JW. The association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and colorectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2020;11:e00173.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다