Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study

Lisa Y W Tang, Nathaniel M Hawkins, Kendall Ho, Roger Tam, Marc W Deyell, Laurent Macle, Atul Verma, Paul Khairy, Robert Sheldon, Jason G Andrade, CIRCA‐DOSE Study Investigators, Lisa Y W Tang, Nathaniel M Hawkins, Kendall Ho, Roger Tam, Marc W Deyell, Laurent Macle, Atul Verma, Paul Khairy, Robert Sheldon, Jason G Andrade, CIRCA‐DOSE Study Investigators

Abstract

Background The natural history of autonomic alterations following catheter ablation of drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is poorly defined, largely because of the historical reliance on non-invasive intermittent rhythm monitoring for outcome ascertainment. Methods and Results The study included 346 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using contemporary advanced-generation ablation technologies. All patients underwent insertion of a Reveal LINQ (Medtronic) implantable cardiac monitor before ablation. The implantable cardiac monitor continuously recorded physical activity, heart rate variability (measured as the SD of the average normal-to-normal), daytime heart rate, and nighttime heart rate. Longitudinal autonomic data in the 2-month period leading up to the date of ablation were compared with the period from 91 to 365 days following ablation. Following ablation there was a significant decrease in SD of the average normal-to-normal (mean difference versus baseline of 19.3 ms; range, 12.9-25.7; P<0.0001), and significant increases in daytime and nighttime heart rates (mean difference versus baseline of 9.6 bpm; range, 7.4-11.8; P<0.0001, and 7.4 bpm; range, 5.4-9.3; P<0.0001, respectively). Patients free of arrhythmia recurrence had significantly faster daytime (11±11 versus 8±12 bpm, P=0.001) and nighttime heart rates (8±9 versus 6±8 bpm, P=0.049), but no difference in SD of the average normal-to-normal (P=0.09) compared with those with atrial fibrillation recurrence. Ablation technology and cryoablation duration did not influence these autonomic nervous system effects. Conclusions Pulmonary vein isolation results in significant sustained changes in the heart rate parameters related to autonomic function. These changes are correlated with procedural outcome and are independent of the ablation technology used. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01913522.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation arrhythmia; autonomic; autonomic function; autonomic nervous system.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Andrade reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic, grants from Baylis, and personal fees from Biosense‐Webster; Dr Verma reports grants and personal fees from Medtronic and Biosense‐Webster; Dr Deyell reports grants from Biosense‐Webster; Dr Macle reports personal fees from Medtronic, grants and personal fees from St. Jude Medical/Abbott and Biosense‐Webster. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary…
Figure 1. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary vein isolation in the study cohort.
Pictured are median and interquartile ranges of the daytime heart rate (A), nighttime heart rate (B), and the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal intervals (C). Date of ablation is noted as time zero on the y‐axis, with a range of −91 days before ablation, and +366 days post‐ablation. SDANN indicates SD of the average normal‐to‐normal intervals.
Figure 2. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary…
Figure 2. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary vein isolation, stratified by randomized group.
Pictured are median values of the daytime heart rate (A), nighttime heart rate (B), and the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal intervals (C). Date of ablation is noted as time zero on the Y axis, with a range of −91 days before ablation, and +366 days post‐ablation. Black line depicts patients randomized to contact‐force radiofrequency ablation, red line depicts those randomized to short duration cryoablation, and pink line depicts those randomized to standard duration cryoablation. CRYO indicates cryoballoon ablation; SDANN, SD of the average normal‐to‐ normal.
Figure 3. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary…
Figure 3. Autonomic alterations pre‐ and post‐pulmonary vein isolation, stratified by procedural outcome.
Pictured are median values of the daytime heart rate (A), nighttime heart rate (B), and the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal intervals (C). Date of ablation is noted as time zero on the y‐axis, with a range of −100 days before ablation, and +365 days post‐ablation. Red line depicts patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia, and green line depicts patients free of arrhythmia recurrence.

References

    1. Oral H, Knight BP, Tada H, Özaydın M, Chugh A, Hassan S, Scharf C, Lai SWK, Greenstein R, Pelosi F Jr, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002;105:1077–1081. DOI: 10.1161/hc0902.104712.
    1. Karch MR, Zrenner B, Deisenhofer I, Schreieck J, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Lamprecht K, Barthel P, Luciani E, Schömig A, et al. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between 2 current ablation strategies. Circulation. 2005;111:2875–2880. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.491530.
    1. Andrade J, Khairy P, Dobrev D, Nattel S. The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2014;114:1453–1468. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303211.
    1. Nakagawa H, Scherlag BJ, Patterson E, Ikeda A, Lockwood D, Jackman WM. Pathophysiologic basis of autonomic ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:S26–S34. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.07.029.
    1. Tan AY, Li H, Wachsmann‐Hogiu S, Chen LS, Chen PS, Fishbein MC. Autonomic innervation and segmental muscular disconnections at the human pulmonary vein‐atrial junction: implications for catheter ablation of atrial‐pulmonary vein junction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:132–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.054.
    1. Katritsis DG, Giazitzoglou E, Zografos T, Pokushalov E, Po SS, Camm AJ. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation combined with autonomic ganglia modification: a randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:672–678. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.047.
    1. Katritsis DG, Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Giazitzoglou E, Siontis GC, Po SS, Camm AJ, Ioannidis JP. Autonomic denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2318–2325.
    1. Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Katritsis DG, Artyomenko S, Shirokova N, Karaskov A, Mittal S, Steinberg JS. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long‐standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1280–1286.
    1. Driessen AHG, Berger WR, Krul SPJ, van den Berg NWE, Neefs J, Piersma FR, Chan Pin Yin D, de Jong J, van Boven WP, de Groot JR. Ganglion plexus ablation in advanced atrial fibrillation: the AFACT study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1155–1165.
    1. Berger WR, Neefs J, van den Berg NWE, Krul SPJ, van Praag EM, Piersma FR, de Jong J, van Boven WP, Driessen AHG, de Groot JR. Additional ganglion plexus ablation during thoracoscopic surgical ablation of advanced atrial fibrillation: intermediate follow‐up of the AFACT study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5:343–353.
    1. Hsieh MH, Chiou CW, Wen ZC, Wu CH, Tai CT, Tsai CF, Ding YA, Chang MS, Chen SA. Alterations of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins. Circulation. 1999;100:2237–2243. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.100.22.2237.
    1. Yamada T, Yoshida N, Murakami Y, Okada T, Yoshida Y, Muto M, Inden Y, Murohara T. The difference in autonomic denervation and its effect on atrial fibrillation recurrence between the standard segmental and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation techniques. Europace. 2009;11:1612–1619. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup330.
    1. Oswald H, Klein G, Koenig T, Luesebrink U, Duncker D, Gardiwal A. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation temporarily modulates the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;29:57–62. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-010-9491-7.
    1. Bauer A, Deisenhofer I, Schneider R, Zrenner B, Barthel P, Karch M, Wagenpfeil S, Schmitt C, Schmidt G. Effects of circumferential or segmental pulmonary vein ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on cardiac autonomic function. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3:1428–1435. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.08.025.
    1. Wang K, Chang D, Chu Z, Yang Y, Gao L, Zhang S, Xia Y, Dong Y, Yin X, Cong P, et al. Denervation as a common mechanism underlying different pulmonary vein isolation strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidenced by heart rate variability after ablation. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:569564. DOI: 10.1155/2013/569564.
    1. Marinkovic M, Mujovic N, Vucicevic V, Steffel J, Potpara TS. A square root pattern of changes in heart rate variability during the first year after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and their relation with longterm arrhythmia recurrence. Kardiol Pol. 2020;78:209–218.
    1. Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Deyell MW, Verma A, Macle L, Leong‐Sit P, Novak P, Badra‐Verdu M, Sapp J, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1779–1788.
    1. Andrade JG, Deyell MW, Badra M, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Leong‐Sit P, Macle L, Novak P, Roux JF, Sapp J, et al. Randomised clinical trial of cryoballoon versus irrigated radio frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation‐the effect of double short versus standard exposure cryoablation duration during pulmonary vein isolation (CIRCA‐DOSE): methods and rationale. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017970.
    1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–e444.
    1. Yao RJR, Macle L, Deyell MW, Tang L, Hawkins NM, Sedlak T, Nault I, Verma A, Khairy P, Andrade JG, et al. Impact of female sex on clinical presentation and ablation outcomes in the circa‐dose study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:945–954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.032.
    1. Scherschel K, Hedenus K, Jungen C, Lemoine MD, Rübsamen N, Veldkamp MW, Klatt N, Lindner D, Westermann D, Casini S, et al. Cardiac glial cells release neurotrophic S100B upon catheter‐based treatment of atrial fibrillation. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaav7770. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav7770.
    1. Goff ZD, Laczay B, Yenokyan G, Sivasambu B, Sinha SK, Marine JE, Ashikaga H, Berger RD, Akhtar T, Spragg DD, et al. Heart rate increase after pulmonary vein isolation predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation at 1 year. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:2818–2822. DOI: 10.1111/jce.14257.
    1. Miyazaki S, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, Hachiya H, Kajiyama T, Watanabe T, Igarashi M, Ichijo S, Hirao K, Iesaka Y. Autonomic nervous system modulation and clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second‐generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:1015–1020. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13262.
    1. Kuyumcu MS, Ozeke O, Cay S, Ozcan F, Bayraktar MF, Kara M, Vicdan M, Acar B, Aydogdu S, Topaloglu S, et al. The short‐term impact of the catheter ablation on noninvasive autonomic nervous system parameters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:1193–1199. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13179.
    1. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258.
    1. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354–381.
    1. Roach D, Wilson W, Ritchie D, Sheldon R. Dissection of long‐range heart rate variability: controlled induction of prognostic measures by activity in the laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2271–2277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.01.050.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다