Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration: Fact or fiction?

Andrada Seicean, Mariana Jinga, Andrada Seicean, Mariana Jinga

Abstract

The negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography fine-needle aspiration is relatively low. To achieve the improvement of the diagnostic yield, the following were proposed: a higher number of passes, the presence of the rapid on-site cytopathologist evaluation, the fanning technique, or the repetition of the fine needle biopsy. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endosonography may better identify the targeted area in the lesions by avoiding the inside necrosis and the vessels of fibrosis, so it can guide the fine-needle aspiration. Both techniques are complementary, not competitive, and they can be done in the same session. The combined technique is simple, safe, and requires only a few minutes with minimal extra costs compared to standard fine-needle aspiration. It minimally increases the diagnostic rate, and it permits the decrease of the number of passes. However, we will know its real clinical impact only in the future and whether it will be incorporated into the lesion assessment process.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic lesion (adenocarcinoma). The pancreatic lesion is hypoenhanced compared to the surrounding tissue, with some vessels inside and a central anechoic necrosis. The needle is inserted into the lesion during the late venous phase (Aloka alpha 7 platform)
Figure 2
Figure 2
The contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic lesion (neuroendocrine tumor). The lesion is hyperenhanced in the arterial phase, with fast washout in the venous phase. There are some remains of contrast inside the lesion during the late venous phase. The needle is inserted into the hyperenhanced region, avoiding the hypoenhanced part situated behind the needle (Aloka F75 platform)
Figure 3
Figure 3
The contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-fine-needle aspiration of a submucosal gastric neoplasm (gastrointestinal stromal tumor). The lesion is hyperenhanced in the arterial phase, with fast washout. The needle is inserted into the lesion during the late venous phase, but very little contrast is still remaining inside (Aloka F75 platform)

References

    1. Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011;23(Suppl 1):29–33.
    1. Hou X, Jin Z, Xu C, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121236.
    1. Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knöfel WT, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768–75.
    1. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–36.
    1. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31.
    1. Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–71.
    1. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–50.
    1. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–49.
    1. Ueda K, Yamashita Y, Itonaga M. Real-time contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (with video) Dig Endosc. 2013;25:631.
    1. Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S, Desai S, et al. Value of repeat endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:567–70.
    1. DeWitt J, McGreevy K, Sherman S, et al. Utility of a repeated EUS at a tertiary-referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:610–9.
    1. Nicaud M, Hou W, Collins D, et al. The utility of repeat endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010. 2010:268290.
    1. Popescu A, Saftoiu A. Can elastography replace fine needle aspiration? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:109–17.
    1. Kitano M, Sakamoto H, Kudo M. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 1):79–85.
    1. Gincul R, Palazzo M, Pujol B, et al. Contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A prospective multicenter trial. Endoscopy. 2014;46:373–9.
    1. Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul R, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: Results of a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:564–70.
    1. Kitano M, Kudo M, Yamao K, et al. Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: The value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:303–10.
    1. Fusaroli P, Eloubeidi MA. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS): Complementary and not competitive with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2014;46:380–1.
    1. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:33–59.
    1. Seicean A, Badea R, Moldovan-Pop A, et al. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the guidance of fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med. 2015 [In press]
    1. Fusaroli P, Serrani M, De Giorgio R, et al. Contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound is useful to identify neoplastic features of pancreatic cysts (With videos) Pancreas. 2016;45:265–8.
    1. Fusaroli P, Kypraios D, Mancino MG, et al. Interobserver agreement in contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27:1063–9.
    1. Faccioli N, Crippa S, Bassi C, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2009;9:560–6.
    1. Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Hikichi T, et al. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial. Pancreatology. 2015;15:538–41.
    1. Moreno M, Gimeno-García AZ, Corriente MM, et al. EUS-FNA of a portal vein thrombosis in a patient with a hidden hepatocellular carcinoma: Confirmation technique after contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Endoscopy. 2014;46:E590–1.
    1. Jenssen C, Alvarez-Sánchez MV, Napoléon B, et al. Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: Assessment of safety and prevention of complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:4659–76.
    1. Dietrich CF, Jenssen C. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Technical Guideline. Endosc Ultrasound. 2013;2:117–22.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다