Assessment of chemomechanical removal of carious lesions using Papacarie Duo™: randomized longitudinal clinical trial

Simone Ferreira Borges Matsumoto, Lara Jansiski Motta, Thays Almeida Alfaya, Carolina Cardoso Guedes, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Simone Ferreira Borges Matsumoto, Lara Jansiski Motta, Thays Almeida Alfaya, Carolina Cardoso Guedes, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes, Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Abstract

Background: Chemomechanical removal of carious lesions consists of the dissolution of carious tissue by the application of a natural or synthetic agent, followed by atraumatic mechanical removal.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of Papacarie Duo ® gel in the chemomechanical removal of carious lesions in primary teeth in comparison to the traditional method (low-speed bur).

Settings and design: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 20 children between 5 and 8 years of age.

Materials and methods: Two teeth were treated in each child (split-mouth design), with the randomization of two methods: Group 1 - chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo™; and Group 2 - removal of carious dentin tissue using a low-speed bur. Both methods involved restoration with glass ionomer cement and follow up. The following aspects were evaluated: time required for the procedure; pain (face evaluation scale); retention of the restorative material in the cavity; and the presence of secondary caries after 30 days.

Statistical analysis used: Chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon test.

Results: No statistically significant differences between methods were found regarding time required for the procedure (P = 0.13), the occurrence of pain (P = 0.585), or restoration status at the 30-day clinical evaluation (P = 0.713).

Conclusion: The findings of the present study demonstrate that the two methods achieve similar results. The advantages of minimally invasive treatment, such as chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo™, are its ease of use, patient comfort, and the fact that it causes less damage to dental tissue.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다