Teaching the blind to find their way by playing video games

Lotfi B Merabet, Erin C Connors, Mark A Halko, Jaime Sánchez, Lotfi B Merabet, Erin C Connors, Mark A Halko, Jaime Sánchez

Abstract

Computer based video games are receiving great interest as a means to learn and acquire new skills. As a novel approach to teaching navigation skills in the blind, we have developed Audio-based Environment Simulator (AbES); a virtual reality environment set within the context of a video game metaphor. Despite the fact that participants were naïve to the overall purpose of the software, we found that early blind users were able to acquire relevant information regarding the spatial layout of a previously unfamiliar building using audio based cues alone. This was confirmed by a series of behavioral performance tests designed to assess the transfer of acquired spatial information to a large-scale, real-world indoor navigation task. Furthermore, learning the spatial layout through a goal directed gaming strategy allowed for the mental manipulation of spatial information as evidenced by enhanced navigation performance when compared to an explicit route learning strategy. We conclude that the immersive and highly interactive nature of the software greatly engages the blind user to actively explore the virtual environment. This in turn generates an accurate sense of a large-scale three-dimensional space and facilitates the learning and transfer of navigation skills to the physical world.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Virtual rendering of a physical…
Figure 1. Virtual rendering of a physical environment represented in the AbES software.
A) architectural floor plan of an existing two story building with 23 rooms, 2 stairwells and 3 exits. For simplicity, only the first floor is shown. B) In gamer mode, the player (yellow icon) navigates through the virtual environment using auditory cues to locate hidden jewels (blue squares) and avoid being caught by chasing monsters (red icons). C) In directed navigation mode, the user learns the spatial layout of the building and the relative location of the rooms using predetermined paths (shown in yellow) and with the assistance of a facilitator.
Figure 2. Comparing performance on navigation tasks…
Figure 2. Comparing performance on navigation tasks between gamers and directed navigator learning strategy.
A) High success on correct paths taken (%) was observed in both groups for room-to-room navigation. B) Average time taken to navigate to target (sec) was also similar in both groups. C) Results of drop off task reveals an advantage for gamers. Paths chosen were scored such that the shortest route possible to exit the building from a given starting point received a maximum of 3 points, 2 for next closest exit, 1 for the longest, 0 for unsuccessful). Gamers showed an advantage over directed navigators in that they were more likely to choose the shortest path on the drop off task (indicated by higher average point score). Error bars indicate S.E.M., n.s.  =  not significant. * = p

References

    1. Bavelier D, Green CS, Han DH, Renshaw PF, Merzenich MM, et al. (2011) Brains on video games. Nature reviews Neuroscience 12: 763–768.
    1. Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323: 66–69.
    1. Shaffer DW, Squire KR, Halverson R, Gee JP (2005) Video Games and the Future of Learning. Phi Delta Kappan 87: 104–111.
    1. Bavelier D, Green CS, Dye MW (2010) Children, wired: for better and for worse. Neuron 67: 692–701.
    1. Lange B, Koenig S, Chang CY, McConnell E, Suma E, et al.. (2012) Designing informed game-based rehabilitation tasks leveraging advances in virtual reality. Disability and rehabilitation.
    1. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG (2001) Navigating without vision: basic and applied research. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 78: 282–289.
    1. Strelow ER (1985) What is needed for a theory of mobility: direct perception and cognitive maps–lessons from the blind. Psychological review 92: 226–248.
    1. Ashmead DH, Hill EW, Talor CR (1989) Obstacle perception by congenitally blind children. Perception & psychophysics 46: 425–433.
    1. von Senden M (1960) Space and sight: the perception of space and shape in the congenitally blind before and after operation: Free Press.
    1. Blasch BB, Wiener WR, Welsh RL, editors (1997) Foundations of Orientation and Mobility (2nd Edition). New York, NY: AFB Press.
    1. Thinus-Blanc C, Gaunet F (1997) Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? Psychological bulletin 121: 20–42.
    1. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL, Barber PO (1985) Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch. Journal of experimental psychology General 114: 33–49.
    1. Gagnon L, Schneider FC, Siebner HR, Paulson OB, Kupers R, et al. (2012) Activation of the hippocampal complex during tactile maze solving in congenitally blind subjects. Neuropsychologia 50: 1663–1671.
    1. Kupers R, Chebat DR, Madsen KH, Paulson OB, Ptito M (2010) Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 12716–12721.
    1. Wolbers T, Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Wutte MG, Giudice NA (2011) Modality-independent coding of spatial layout in the human brain. Current biology: CB 21: 984–989.
    1. Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in child development and behavior 10: 9–55.
    1. Cattaneo Z, Vecchi T, Cornoldi C, Mammarella I, Bonino D, et al. (2008) Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 32: 1346–1360.
    1. Lahav O (2006) Using virtual environment to improve spatial perception by people who are blind. Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 9: 174–177.
    1. Lahav O, Schloerb DW, Srinivasan MA (2011) Newly blind persons using virtual environment system in a traditional orientation and mobility rehabilitation program: a case study. Disability and rehabilitation Assistive technology.
    1. Chebat DR, Schneider FC, Kupers R, Ptito M (2011) Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals. Neuroreport 22: 342–347.
    1. Giudice NA, Bakdash JZ, Legge GE (2007) Wayfinding with words: spatial learning and navigation using dynamically updated verbal descriptions. Psychological research 71: 347–358.
    1. Johnson LA, Higgins CM (2006) A navigation aid for the blind using tactile-visual sensory substitution. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference 1: 6289–6292.
    1. Kalia AA, Legge GE, Roy R, Ogale A (2010) Assessment of Indoor Route-finding Technology for People with Visual Impairment. Journal of visual impairment & blindness 104: 135–147.
    1. Merabet L, Sánchez J (2009) Audio-based Navigation Using Virtual Environments: Combining Technology and Neuroscience. AER Journal: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness 2: 128–137.
    1. Fortin M, Voss P, Lord C, Lassonde M, Pruessner J, et al. (2008) Wayfinding in the blind: larger hippocampal volume and supranormal spatial navigation. Brain: a journal of neurology 131: 2995–3005.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다