Psychometric properties of the persian version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in iran

Reza Bagherian-Sararoudi, Ahmadreza Hajian, Hadi Bahrami Ehsan, Mehdi Reza Sarafraz, Gregory D Zimet, Reza Bagherian-Sararoudi, Ahmadreza Hajian, Hadi Bahrami Ehsan, Mehdi Reza Sarafraz, Gregory D Zimet

Abstract

Background: Social support is a complex and multifaceted construct. Thus, It is important that a given social support scale be theoretically grounded and its purview clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability, validity and factor structure of the Iranian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).

Methods: The sample study included 176 consecutive myocardial infarction (MI) patients admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) ward of nine hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, and 71 consecutive subjects from the general population. They all filled out the final Iranian version of the MSPSS and also 71 participants filled out the MSPSS twice over a 2-month period. Factor analysis, Cronbach's α coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient correlation were used to analyze data.

Results: Factor analysis of the scores of the patient and healthy samples yielded a three-factor structure, including family, friends and significant others. The percentage of variance explained by the three factors in the patient sample and healthy sample were 77.87% and 78.55%, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficient has been found to be 0.84 for the scale and 0.90, 0.93 and 0.85, respectively, for the friends, significant others and family subscales from the patient sample, and 0.92 for the scale and 0.89, 0.92 and 0.87, respectively, for the friends, significant others and family subscales from the healthy sample. Test-retest stability over a 2-month period yielded 0.84 for the scale and 0.73, 0.78 and 0.84, respectively, for the friends, significant others and family subscales from the healthy sample.

Conclusions: The findings proved the three-factor structure of the Iranian version of the MSPSS and indicated that the Iranian version of the MSPSS is a reliable, valid and acceptable measure of perceived social support.

Keywords: Iranian population; psychometric properties; social support.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Brix C, Schleussner C, Füller J, Roehrig B, Wendt TG, Strauss B. The need for psychosocial support and its determinants in a sample of patients undergoing radiooncological treatment of cancer. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65:541–8.
    1. Berkman LF, Blumenthal J, Burg M, Carney RM, Catellier D, Cowan MJ, et al. Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: The enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD) randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:3106–16.
    1. Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Peveler R, Moss-Morris R. Social support and cancer progression: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67:403–15.
    1. Sarason BR, Sarason IG. Assessment of social support. In: Shumaker SA, Czajkowski SM, editors. Social Support and Cardiovascular Diseases. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. pp. 41–63.
    1. Troxel WM, Buysse DJ, Monk TH, Begley A, Hall M. Does social support differentially affect sleep in older adults with versus without insomnia? J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:459–66.
    1. Ye XQ, Chen WQ, Lin JX, Wang RP, Zhang ZH, Yang X, et al. Effect of social support on psychological-stress-induced anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65:157–64.
    1. Burg MM, Barefoot J, Berkman L, Catelier DJ, Czajkowski S, Saab P, et al. Low perceived social support and post-myocardial infarction prognosis in the enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease clinical trial: The effects of treatment. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:879–88.
    1. Krantz DS, McCeney MK. Effects of psychological and social factors on organic disease: A critical assessment of research on coronary heart disease. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:341–69.
    1. Coventry WL, Gillespie NA, Heath AC, Martin NG. Perceived social support in a large community sample: Age and sex differences. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39:625–36.
    1. Ng CG, Amer Siddiq AN, Aida SA, Zainal NZ, Koh OH. Validation of the malay version of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS-M) among a group of medical students in Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya. Asian J Psychiatr. 2010;3:3–6.
    1. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol. 1983;11:1–24.
    1. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J pers assess. 1988;52:30–41.
    1. Canty-Mitchell J, Zimet GD. Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in urban adolescents. Am J Community Psychol. 2000;28:391–400.
    1. Cheng S, Chan AC. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support: Dimensionality and age and gender differences in adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;37:1359–69.
    1. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1990;55:610–7.
    1. Bruwer B, Emsley R, Kidd M, Lochner C, Seedat S. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in youth. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49:195–201.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다