The effect of adding group-based counselling to individual lifestyle counselling on changes in dietary intake. The Inter99 study--a randomized controlled trial

Ulla Toft, Lis Kristoffersen, Steen Ladelund, Lars Ovesen, Cathrine Lau, Charlotta Pisinger, Lisa von Huth Smith, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Torben Jørgensen, Ulla Toft, Lis Kristoffersen, Steen Ladelund, Lars Ovesen, Cathrine Lau, Charlotta Pisinger, Lisa von Huth Smith, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Torben Jørgensen

Abstract

Background: Few studies have investigated the specific effect of single intervention components in randomized controlled trials. The purpose was to investigate the effect of adding group-based diet and exercise counselling to individual life-style counselling on long-term changes in dietary habits.

Methods: The study was a randomized controlled intervention study. From a general Danish population, aged 30 to 60 years (n = 61,301), two random sample were drawn (group A, n = 11,708; group B, n = 1,308). Subjects were invited for a health screening program. Participation rate was 52.5%. All participants received individual life-style counselling. Individuals at high risk of ischemic heart disease in group A were furthermore offered group-based life-style counselling. The intervention was repeated for high-risk individuals after one and three years. At five-year follow-up all participants were invited for a health examination. High risk individuals were included in this study (n = 2 356) and changes in dietary intake were analyzed using multilevel linear regression analyses.

Results: At one-year follow-up group A had significantly increased the unsaturated/saturated fat ratio compared to group B and in men a significantly greater decrease in saturated fat intake was found in group A compared to group B (net change: -1.13 E%; P = 0.003). No differences were found between group A and B at three-year follow-up. At five-year follow-up group A had significantly increased the unsaturated/saturated fat ratio (net change: 0.09; P = 0.01) and the fish intake compared to group B (net change: 5.4 g/day; P = 0.05). Further, in men a non-significant tendency of a greater decrease was found at five year follow-up in group A compared to group B (net change: -0.68 E%; P = 0.10). The intake of fibre and vegetables increased in both groups, however, no significant difference was found between the groups. No differences between groups were found for saturated fat intake in women.

Conclusion: Offering group-based counselling in addition to individual counselling resulted in small, but significantly improved dietary habits at five-year follow-up and a tendency of better maintenance, compared to individual counselling alone.

Trial registration: The Inter99 study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (KA 98 155) and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT00289237).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart of the Inter99 study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Development in the unsaturated-saturated fat ratio from baseline to five-year follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Development in the intake of fish from baseline to five year follow-up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Development in the intake of saturated fat (E%) from baseline to five year follow-up.

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Technical Report Series No 916. WHO; 2003. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic Diseases.
    1. Brunner EJ, Thorogood M, Rees K, Hewitt G. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD002128.
    1. Ammerman A, Pignone MP, Fernandez L, Lohr KN, Jacobs A. Counseling to promote a healthy diet. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2002.
    1. Ebrahim S, Davey SG. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD001561.
    1. Lear S, Ignaszewski A, Linden W, et al. The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1920–7.
    1. Roe L, Hunt P, Bradshaw H, Rayner M. Health Promotion interventions to promote healthy eating in the general population – a review. Health Education Authority. 1997.
    1. Tang JL, Armitage JM, Lancaster T, Silagy CA, Fowler GH, Neil HA. Systematic review of dietary intervention trials to lower blood total cholesterol in free-living subjects. BMJ. 1998;316:1213–20.
    1. Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohr KN, Hersey J. The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med. 2002;35:25–41.
    1. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M. Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr. 2005;135:2486–95.
    1. Toft U, Kristoffersen L, Ladelund S, Ovesen L, Lau C, Borch-Johnsen K, Pisinger C, Jørgensen T. The impact of a population-based multi-factorial lifestyle intervention on changes in long-term dietary habits. The Inter99 study. Prev Med. 2008;47:378–383.
    1. Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen TF, Ibsen H, Glumer C, Pisinger C. A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99 (1) Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003;10:377–86.
    1. Glumer C, Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K. Prevalences of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in a Danish population: the Inter99 study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2335–40.
    1. Thomsen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Davidsen M, Ibsen H. The "PRECARD" study: Identificattion and management of individuals at risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 1997;13:286B–7B.
    1. Britt E, Hudson SM, Blampied NM. Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53:147–55.
    1. Janz N, Becker M. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11:1–47.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundation of thoughts and action: A social cognitive theory. New York: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Prochaska J, DiClemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people change: Application to addictive behaviours. In: Marlatt G, van den Bos H, editor. Addictive behaviours: Readings on etiology, prevention, and treatment. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. pp. 671–96.
    1. Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes: comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968;38:1104–15.
    1. Toft U, Kristoffersen L, Ladelund S, et al. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire used in the Inter99 study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1038–1046.
    1. Haraldsdottir J, Seppänen R, Steinrímsdóttir L, Trygg K, Hagman U. Portion sizes: Nordic Standard Portions of Food and Foodstuffs. Nordic Council and Council of Ministers. 1998.
    1. Saxholt E, Møller A, Ygil K. Danish Food Composition Databank Version 6.0 [Fødevaredatabanken Version 6.0] Department of Nutrition, The Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Søborg, Denmark. 2005.
    1. Lauritsen J. FoodCalc 1.3 1998. 1998.
    1. Lewin K. Group Decision and Social Change. In: Maccoby E, editor. Social Pshycology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1958. pp. 197–211.
    1. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based education in self management strategies improves outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD003417.
    1. Stead LF, Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD001007.
    1. Toft U, Kristoffersen L, Aadahl M, Smith L, Pisinger C, Jørgensen T. Diet and exercise intervention in a general population – mediators of participation and adherence: the Inter99 study. Eur J Public Health. 2007;17:455–63.
    1. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analyses with missing data. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
    1. Wood A, White I, Hillsdon M, Carpenter J. Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:89–99.
    1. Stein A, Shea S, Basch C, Contento I, Zybert P. Assessing changes in nutrient intakes of preschool children: comparison of 24-hour dietary recall and food frequency methods. Epidemiology. 1994;5:109–15.
    1. Osler M, Godtfredsen J, Grønbæk M, Marckmann P, Overvad K. A quantitative assessment of the impact of diet on the mortality of heart disease in Denmark. Ugeskr Laeger. 2000;162:4921–4925.
    1. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13:3–9.
    1. Thoolen B, de Ridder D, Bensing J, Gorter K, Rutten G. Who participates in Diabetes Self-management Interventions?: Issues of Recruitment and Retainment. The Diabetes Educator. 2007;33:465–74.
    1. Hunninghake D, Darby C, Probstfield J. Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. 1987;8:6s–30s.
    1. Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to Participate in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:1143–56.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다