Modeling of In-Utero and Intra-Partum Transmissions to Evaluate the Efficacy of Interventions for the Prevention of Perinatal HIV

Patumrat Sripan, Sophie Le Coeur, Billy Amzal, Lily Ingsrisawang, Patrinee Traisathit, Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong, Kenneth McIntosh, Tim R Cressey, Suraphan Sangsawang, Boonsong Rawangban, Prateep Kanjanavikai, Jean-Marc Tréluyer, Gonzague Jourdain, Marc Lallemant, Saïk Urien, Patumrat Sripan, Sophie Le Coeur, Billy Amzal, Lily Ingsrisawang, Patrinee Traisathit, Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong, Kenneth McIntosh, Tim R Cressey, Suraphan Sangsawang, Boonsong Rawangban, Prateep Kanjanavikai, Jean-Marc Tréluyer, Gonzague Jourdain, Marc Lallemant, Saïk Urien

Abstract

Background: Antiretroviral treatments decrease HIV mother-to-child transmission through pre/post exposure prophylaxis and reduction of maternal viral load. We modeled in-utero and intra-partum HIV transmissions to investigate the preventive role of various antiretroviral treatments interventions.

Methods: We analysed data from 3,759 women-infant pairs enrolled in 3 randomized clinical trials evaluating (1) zidovudine monotherapy, (2) zidovudine plus perinatal single-dose nevirapine or (3) zidovudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Thailand. All infants were formula-fed. Non-linear mixed effect modeling was used to express the viral load evolution under antiretroviral treatments and the probability of transmission.

Results: Median viral load was 4 log10 copies/mL (Interquartile range: 3.36-4.56) before antiretroviral treatments initiation. An Emax model described the viral load time-course during pregnancy. Half of the maximum effect of zidovudine (28% decrease) and lopinavir/ritonavir (72% decrease) were achieved after 98 and 12 days, respectively. Adjusted on viral load at baseline (Odds ratio = 1.50 [95% confidence interval: 1.34, 1.68] per log10 copies/mL increment), antiretroviral treatments duration (OR = 0.80 [0.75, 0.84] per week increment) but not the nature of antiretroviral treatments were associated with in-utero transmission. Adjusted on gestational age at delivery (<37 weeks, OR = 2.37 [1.37, 4.10]), baseline CD4 (Odds ratio = 0.79 [0.72, 0.88] per 100 cells/mm3 increment) and predicted viral load at delivery (OR = 1.47 [1.25, 1.64] per log10 copies/mL increment), single-dose nevirapine considerably reduced intra-partum transmission (OR = 0.32 [0.2, 0.51]).

Conclusion: These models determined the respective contributions of various antiretroviral strategies on prevention of mother-to-child transmission. This can help predict the efficacy of new antiretroviral treatments and/or prevention of mother-to-child transmission strategies particularly for women with no or late antenatal care who are at high risk of transmitting HIV to their offspring.

Trial registration: This analysis is based on secondary data obtained from three clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00386230, NCT00398684, NCT00409591.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The author BA is employed by Laser ANALYTICA. However, this company does not work on HIV, and did not sponsor this research. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Population disposition.
Fig 1. Population disposition.
Fig 2. Diagnostic plots for viral load…
Fig 2. Diagnostic plots for viral load time-course model.
Top: 2a and 2b: Observed versus model predicted viral load values (expressed as log10 copies) of the population and individual predictions respectively. Solid black circles, measure values; grey symbols, simulation of below the limit of quantification data. Line, identity line. Bottom: Visual predictive check plots. (2c) Women receiving only zidovudine (ZDV); (2d) women receiving zidovudine plus lopinavir/ritonavir (ZDV+LPV/r).The lines denote the median, 5th and 95th percentiles for the observed data. The grey areas stand for the 95% confidence intervals of the median, 5th and 95th model prediction percentiles.
Fig 3. Transmission probabilities according to zidovudine…
Fig 3. Transmission probabilities according to zidovudine duration, viral load at baseline/delivery, and nevirapine intake.
A. Probability of in-utero HIV transmission as a function of zidovudine duration; B. Probability of in-utero HIV transmission as a function of viral load at baseline. The lines denote the median, 5th and 95thpercentiles of the model predictions. The open circles stand for the observed mean proportion of transmission, the solid vertical segments denote the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (numbers at top of each segment stand for the number of women in each time interval or VL interval). C. Probability of intra-partum HIV mother-to-child transmission as a function of viral load at delivery without single dose nevirapine; D. Probability of intra-partum HIV mother-to-child transmission as a function of viral load at delivery with single dose nevirapine.

References

    1. De Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier E, de Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and practice. JAMA. 2000;283: 1175–1182.
    1. Mofenson LM, Lambert JS, Stiehm ER, Bethel J, Meyer WA 3rd, Whitehouse J, et al. Risk factors for perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in women treated with zidovudine. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 185 Team. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 385–393. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410601
    1. Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, Kiselev P, Scott G, O’Sullivan MJ, et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331: 1173–1180. 10.1056/NEJM199411033311801
    1. Lallemant M, Jourdain G, Le Coeur S, Kim S, Koetsawang S, Comeau AM, et al. A trial of shortened zidovudine regimens to prevent mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Perinatal HIV Prevention Trial (Thailand) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;343: 982–991. 10.1056/NEJM200010053431401
    1. Mandelbrot L, Landreau-Mascaro A, Rekacewicz C, Berrebi A, Bénifla JL, Burgard M, et al. Lamivudine-zidovudine combination for prevention of maternal-infant transmission of HIV-1. JAMA. 2001;285: 2083–2093.
    1. Kesho Bora Study Group, de Vincenzi I. Triple antiretroviral compared with zidovudine and single-dose nevirapine prophylaxis during pregnancy and breastfeeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 (Kesho Bora study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11: 171–180. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70288-7
    1. Chung MH, Kiarie JN, Richardson BA, Lehman DA, Overbaugh J, Njiri F, et al. Independent effects of nevirapine prophylaxis and HIV-1 RNA suppression in breast milk on early perinatal HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46: 472–478.
    1. Shapiro RL, Hughes MD, Ogwu A, Kitch D, Lockman S, Moffat C, et al. Antiretroviral regimens in pregnancy and breast-feeding in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2010;362: 2282–2294. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907736
    1. WHO | Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection. In: WHO [Internet]. [cited 30 Jul 2014]. Available: .
    1. Lallemant M, Jourdain G, Le Coeur S, Mary JY, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Koetsawang S, et al. Single-dose perinatal nevirapine plus standard zidovudine to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 217–228. 10.1056/NEJMoa033500
    1. Cressey TR, Jourdain G, Lallemant MJ, Kunkeaw S, Jackson JB, Musoke P, et al. Persistence of nevirapine exposure during the postpartum period after intrapartum single-dose nevirapine in addition to zidovudine prophylaxis for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38: 283–288.
    1. Lallemant M, Jourdain G, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Le Coeur S, Cressey TR, Puangsombat A, et al. Maternal and infant nevirapine versus infant only nevirapine, or maternal lopinavir/ritonavir in addition to standard zidovudine prophylaxis to prevent perinatal HIV in Thailand. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, USA,; 27 February-2 March.
    1. Bryson YJ, Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL, Wara DW. Proposed definitions for in utero versus intrapartum transmission of HIV-1. N Engl J Med. 1992;327: 1246–1247. 10.1056/NEJM199210223271718
    1. Holford NH, Sheiner LB. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981;6: 429–453.
    1. Jourdain G, Mary J-Y, Coeur SL, Ngo-Giang-Huong N, Yuthavisuthi P, Limtrakul A, et al. Risk factors for in utero or intrapartum mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2007;196: 1629–1636. 10.1086/522009
    1. Magder LS, Mofenson L, Paul ME, Zorrilla CD, Blattner WA, Tuomala RE, et al. Risk factors for in utero and intrapartum transmission of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38: 87–95.
    1. Savic RM, Mentré F, Lavielle M. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics. AAPS J. 2011;13: 44–53. 10.1208/s12248-010-9238-5
    1. Kuhn E, Lavielle M. Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2005;49: 1020–1038. 10.1016/j.csda.2004.07.002
    1. Samson A, Lavielle M, Mentré F. Extension of the SAEM algorithm to left-censored data in nonlinear mixed-effects model: Application to HIV dynamics model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2006;51: 1562–1574. 10.1016/j.csda.2006.05.007
    1. Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research Sociological methodology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell; 1995. pp. 111–196.
    1. Sperling RS, Shapiro DE, Coombs RW, Todd JA, Herman SA, McSherry GD, et al. Maternal viral load, zidovudine treatment, and the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from mother to infant. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335: 1621–1629. 10.1056/NEJM199611283352201
    1. Rouzioux C, Costagliola D, Burgard M, Blanche S, Mayaux MJ, Griscelli C, et al. Estimated timing of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission by use of a Markov model. The HIV Infection in Newborns French Collaborative Study Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142: 1330–1337.
    1. Dabis F, Msellati P, Meda N, Welffens-Ekra C, You B, Manigart O, et al. 6-month efficacy, tolerance, and acceptability of a short regimen of oral zidovudine to reduce vertical transmission of HIV in breastfed children in Côte d’Ivoire and Burkina Faso: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial. DITRAME Study Group. DIminution de la Transmission Mère-Enfant. Lancet. 1999;353: 786–792.
    1. Shaffer N, Chuachoowong R, Mock PA, Bhadrakom C, Siriwasin W, Young NL, et al. Short-course zidovudine for perinatal HIV-1 transmission in Bangkok, Thailand: a randomised controlled trial. Bangkok Collaborative Perinatal HIV Transmission Study Group. Lancet. 1999;353: 773–780.
    1. Wiktor SZ, Ekpini E, Karon JM, Nkengasong J, Maurice C, Severin ST, et al. Short-course oral zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;353: 781–785. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10412-9
    1. Dryden-Peterson S, Jayeoba O, Hughes MD, Jibril H, Keapoletswe K, Tlale J, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy versus zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission in a programmatic setting, Botswana. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58: 353–357. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31822d4063
    1. Phanuphak N, Lolekha R. Thai national guidelines for the prevention of motherto-child transmission of HIV: March 2010. Asian Biomed. 2011;4: 529 10.5372/abm.v4i4.544
    1. Taylor GP, Clayden P, Dhar J, Gandhi K, Gilleece Y, Harding K, et al. British HIV Association guidelines for the management of HIV infection in pregnant women 2012. HIV Med. 2012;13 Suppl 2: 87–157. 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01030_2.x
    1. Kuhn L, Abrams EJ, Matheson PB, Thomas PA, Lambert G, Bamji M, et al. Timing of maternal-infant HIV transmission: associations between intrapartum factors and early polymerase chain reaction results. New York City Perinatal HIV Transmission Collaborative Study Group. AIDS. 1997;11: 429–435.
    1. Kuhn L, Steketee RW, Weedon J, Abrams EJ, Lambert G, Bamji M, et al. Distinct risk factors for intrauterine and intrapartum human immunodeficiency virus transmission and consequences for disease progression in infected children. Perinatal AIDS Collaborative Transmission Study. J Infect Dis. 1999;179: 52–58. 10.1086/314551
    1. The International Perinatal HIV Group. The mode of delivery and the risk of vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1—a meta-analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 1999;340: 977–987. 10.1056/NEJM199904013401301
    1. European Mode of Delivery Collaboration. Elective caesarean-section versus vaginal delivery in prevention of vertical HIV-1 transmission: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 1999;353: 1035–1039.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다