Towards a model for integrative medicine in Swedish primary care

Tobias Sundberg, Jeremy Halpin, Anders Warenmark, Torkel Falkenberg, Tobias Sundberg, Jeremy Halpin, Anders Warenmark, Torkel Falkenberg

Abstract

Background: Collaboration between providers of conventional care and complementary therapies (CTs) has gained in popularity but there is a lack of conceptualised models for delivering such care, i.e. integrative medicine (IM). The aim of this paper is to describe some key findings relevant to the development and implementation of a proposed model for IM adapted to Swedish primary care.

Methods: Investigative procedures involved research group and key informant meetings with multiple stakeholders including general practitioners, CT providers, medical specialists, primary care administrators and county council representatives. Data collection included meeting notes which were fed back within the research group and used as ongoing working documents. Data analysis was made by immersion/crystallisation and research group consensus. Results were categorised within a public health systems framework of structures, processes and outcomes.

Results: The outcome was an IM model that aimed for a patient-centered, interdisciplinary, non-hierarchical mix of conventional and complementary medical solutions to individual case management of patients with pain in the lower back and/or neck. The IM model case management adhered to standard clinical practice including active partnership between a gate-keeping general practitioner, collaborating with a team of CT providers in a consensus case conference model of care. CTs with an emerging evidence base included Swedish massage therapy, manual therapy/naprapathy, shiatsu, acupuncture and qigong.

Conclusion: Despite identified barriers such as no formal recognition of CT professions in Sweden, it was possible to develop a model for IM adapted to Swedish primary care. The IM model calls for testing and refinement in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial to explore its clinical effectiveness.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Processes and structures. Key processes (P), i.e. research group activities, and structures (S), i.e. organisational elements, created by the research group in the development and implementation of the integrative medicine model adapted to Swedish primary care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outcome, the integrative medicine model. The integrative medicine model adapted to Swedish primary care illustrated as a clinical case management flowchart: 1) The patient with sub-acute to chronic low back pain or neck pain consults the general practitioner gatekeeper at the primary care unit.; 2) The patient and the general practitioner develop a treatment plan.; 3) The patient is offered conventional care, i.e. treatment as usual.; 4) Should complementary therapies be considered appropriate, these are integrated into the treatment plan by way of a consensus case conference with the integrative medicine provider team.; 5) The patient is offered complementary therapies as part of the treatment plan, i.e. integrative care.; 6) When the treatment plan is completed the case management is finished. Please note that integrative care was only delivered for up to 12 weeks.

References

    1. What is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)?
    1. World Health Organization . General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine (WHO/EDM/TRM/20001) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
    1. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. Jama. 1998;280:1569–1575. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1569.
    1. Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Alternative therapies in health and medicine. 2005;11:42–49.
    1. Sipkoff M. Steadily, plans increase coverage of unorthodox medical therapies. Manag Care. 2005;14:59–60.
    1. Wolsko PM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Phillips RS. Insurance coverage, medical conditions, and visits to alternative medicine providers: results of a national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:281–287. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.3.281.
    1. Sturm R, Unutzer J. State legislation and the use of complementary and alternative medicine. Inquiry. 2000;37:423–429.
    1. Barberis L, de Toni E, Schiavone M, Zicca A, Ghio R. Unconventional medicine teaching at the Universities of the European Union. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7:337–343. doi: 10.1089/107555301750463215.
    1. Wetzel MS, Kaptchuk TJ, Haramati A, Eisenberg DM. Complementary and alternative medical therapies: implications for medical education. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:191–196.
    1. Cassileth BR. The Integrative Medicine Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Semin Oncol. 2002;29:585–588. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.50009.
    1. Vohra S, Feldman K, Johnston B, Waters K, Boon H. Integrating complementary and alternative medicine into academic medical centers: experience and perceptions of nine leading centers in North America. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:78. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-78.
    1. World Health Organization . 56th World health assembly resolution on traditional medicine Document WHA5631. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Hanssen B, Grimsgaard S, Launso L, Fonnebo V, Falkenberg T, Rasmussen NK. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in the Scandinavian countries. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2005;23:57–62. doi: 10.1080/02813430510018419.
    1. Nilsson M, Trehn G, Asplund K. Use of complementary and alternative medicine remedies in Sweden. A population-based longitudinal study within the northern Sweden MONICA Project. Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease. J Intern Med. 2001;250:225–233. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00882.x.
    1. Stockholms Läns Landsting Forskningscentrum för komplementär medicin. Stockholm: Hälso- och sjukvårdsnämnden. 1999.
    1. Stockholms Läns Landsting Stockholmare och den komplementära medicinen. Stockholm: Hälso- och sjukvårdsnämnden. 2001.
    1. Landstingsförbundet, Örebro Universitet . Den komplementära medicinens utbredning och tillämpning inom landets landsting. Örebro: Repro, Örebro Universitet; 2001.
    1. Furlan AD, Brosseau L, Imamura M, Irvin E. Massage for low-back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 2002;27:1896–1910. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00017.
    1. Furlan AD, van Tulder M, Cherkin D, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes B, Berman B. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: an updated systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine. 2005;30:944–963. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158941.21571.01.
    1. Kay TM, Gross A, Goldsmith C, Santaguida PL, Hoving J, Bronfort G. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD004250.
    1. Melchart D, Linde K, Fischer P, Berman B, White A, Vickers A, Allais G. Acupuncture for idiopathic headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001:CD001218.
    1. Boon H, Verhoef M, O'Hara D, Findlay B. From parallel practice to integrative health care: a conceptual framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-15.
    1. Cohen MM, Penman S, Pirotta M, Da Costa C. The integration of complementary therapies in Australian general practice: results of a national survey. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine New York, NY. 2005;11:995–1004. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.995.
    1. World Health Organization . National policy on traditional medicine and regulation of herbal medicines Report of a WHO global survey. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. Rees L, Weil A. Integrated medicine. Bmj. 2001;322:119–120. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7279.119.
    1. Medborgarstatistik
    1. Borkan J. Immersion/Crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, editor. Doing Qualitative Research. 2. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc; 1999.
    1. Handler A, Issel M, Turnock B. A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1235–1239.
    1. Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. I. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; 1980.
    1. Frenkel MA, Borkan JM. An approach for integrating complementary-alternative medicine into primary care. Fam Pract. 2003;20:324–332. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg315.
    1. Barrett B, Marchand L, Scheder J, Plane MB, Maberry R, Appelbaum D, Rakel D, Rabago D. Themes of holism, empowerment, access, and legitimacy define complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in relation to conventional biomedicine. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine New York, NY. 2003;9:937–947. doi: 10.1089/107555303771952271.
    1. Caspi O, Bell IR, Rychener D, Gaudet TW, Weil AT. The Tower of Babel: communication and medicine: An essay on medical education and complementary-alternative medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3193–3195. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3193.
    1. Anderson R. A case study in integrative medicine: alternative theories and the language of biomedicine. J Altern Complement Med. 1999;5:165–173. discussion 175-166.
    1. Verhoef M. Evaluating integrative medicine: Science and art. Commentary on "A descriptive analysis of an integrative medicine clinic". The journal of alternative and complementary medicine. 2004;10:595–596.
    1. Sveriges Riksdag Socialdepartementet . Lag (1998:531) om yrkesverksamhet på hälso- och sjukvårdens område. Vol. 1998. Sveriges Riksdag; 1998. p. 531.
    1. Gamst A, Haahr N, Kristoffersen AE, Launso L. Integrative care and bridge building among health care providers in Norway and Denmark. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine New York, NY. 2006;12:141–146. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.141.
    1. Alternativ behandlingsloven – albhl. Lov om alternativ behandling av sykdom mv
    1. Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ader HJ, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2003;326:911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7395.911.
    1. Ernst E. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine An evidence based approach. 2. Philadelphia, PA, USA.: Elsevier Ltd; 2006.
    1. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. Jama. 1998;279:1548–1553. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1548.
    1. Paterson C, Peacock W. Complementary practitioners as part of the primary health care team: evaluation of one model. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:255–258.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다