Effects of Semaglutide on Stroke Subtypes in Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6

W David Strain, Ofir Frenkel, Martin A James, Lawrence A Leiter, Søren Rasmussen, Peter M Rothwell, Maria Sejersten Ripa, Thomas C Truelsen, Mansoor Husain, W David Strain, Ofir Frenkel, Martin A James, Lawrence A Leiter, Søren Rasmussen, Peter M Rothwell, Maria Sejersten Ripa, Thomas C Truelsen, Mansoor Husain

Abstract

Background: GLP-1 RA (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists), including semaglutide, may reduce stroke risk in people with type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis examined the subcutaneous and oral semaglutide effects, versus placebo, on stroke and its subtypes in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.

Methods: SUSTAIN 6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-Term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) and PIONEER 6 (Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment) were randomized cardiovascular outcome trials of subcutaneous and oral semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, respectively. Time to first stroke and stroke subtypes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial with pooled treatment as a factor. The impact of prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction or stroke, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and prior atrial fibrillation on treatment effects was assessed using interaction P values. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular event was analyzed according to prior stroke.

Results: A total of 106/6480 participants had a stroke (1.0 event/100 patient-years of observation [PYO]). Semaglutide reduced incidence of any stroke versus placebo (0.8 versus 1.1 events/100 PYO; hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.46-1.00]; P=0.048), driven by significant reductions in risk of small-vessel occlusion (0.3 versus 0.7 events/100 PYO; hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.29-0.89]; P=0.017). Hazard ratios for risk of any stroke with semaglutide versus placebo were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37-0.99; 0.5 versus 0.9 events/100 PYO) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.47-1.69; 2.7 versus 3.0 events/100 PYO) in those without and with prior stroke, respectively. Except for prior atrial fibrillation (Pinteraction=0.025), no significant interactions were observed between treatment effects on risk of any stroke and subgroups investigated, or between treatment effects on risk of major adverse cardiovascular event and prior stroke (Pinteraction >0.05 for all).

Conclusions: Semaglutide reduced incidence of any first stroke during the trials versus placebo in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, primarily driven by small-vessel occlusion prevention. Semaglutide treatment, versus placebo, lowered the risk of stroke irrespective of prior stroke at baseline.

Registration: URL: https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01720446 and NCT02692716.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; blood pressure; myocardial infarction; peptides; prevalence.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Aalen-Johansen plots for time to first occurrence of any stroke* with the pooled semaglutide versus placebo in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, based on pooled data from the SUSTAIN 6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-Term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) and PIONEER 6 (Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment) trials. *Included fatal and nonfatal strokes. The cumulative incidence rates for time to first stroke were calculated using Aalen-Johansen method, adjusting for all-cause death as a competing risk. The hazard ratio was estimated from a Cox regression model stratified by trial with treatment (pooled semaglutide vs placebo) as a factor. HR indicates hazard ratio.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of semaglutide versus placebo on risk of any stroke and stroke subtypes in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, based on pooled data from the SUSTAIN 6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-Term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) and PIONEER 6 (Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment) trials. Data for any stroke and those subtypes based on the TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) criteria have been included (transient ischemic attacks were not included in this analysis). Any stroke (including fatal and nonfatal strokes) and the 3 main subtypes were confirmed by the trial-specific Event Adjudication Committee. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial with treatment (pooled semaglutide vs placebo) as a factor was used to examine treatment effects. The trial-specific analysis showed that the treatment effects were homogenous across SUSTAIN 6 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.41–1.03]) and PIONEER 6 (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.37–1.56]), Pinteraction=0.73. *Ischemic strokes were subcategorized according to TOAST criteria, by an external, blinded reviewer. †Included patients with ≥2 causes of stroke, undetermined cause despite extensive evaluation, and cause of stroke not known due to cursory evaluation. n indicates number of patients with specified stroke type; N, number of patients in the treatment group; and N/A, not applicable.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of semaglutide versus placebo on risk of any stroke stratified by prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, age, sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) risk, based on pooled data from the (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-Term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) and PIONEER 6 (Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment) trials. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial with treatment (pooled semaglutide vs placebo) by subgroups as a fixed factor was used to examine treatment effects across the subgroups. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; and HR, hazard ratio.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th edn. Brussels, Belgium: 2019. Available at: . Accessed May 2021.
    1. The Emerging Risk Factors C. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9
    1. Weng W, Tian Y, Kong SX, Ganguly R, Hersloev M, Brett J, Hobbs T. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and antidiabetes treatment characteristics among a large type 2 diabetes population in the United States. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019;2:e00076. doi: 10.1002/edm2.76
    1. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, et al. ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160–2236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024
    1. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Xu H, Matsouaka RA, Xian Y, Schwamm LH, Smith EE, Bhatt DL, Hernandez AF, Heidenreich PA, Fonarow GC. Diabetes and long-term outcomes of ischaemic stroke: findings from get with the Guidelines-Stroke. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2376–2386. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy036
    1. Flach C, Muruet W, Wolfe CDA, Bhalla A, Douiri A. Risk and secondary prevention of stroke recurrence: a population-base cohort study. Stroke. 2020;51:2435–2444. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028992
    1. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, Kamel H, Kernan WN, Kittner SJ, Leira EC, et al. . 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52:e364–e467. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000375
    1. Shou J, Zhou L, Zhu S, Zhang X. Diabetes is an independent risk factor for stroke recurrence in stroke patients: a meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:1961–1968. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.04.004
    1. Ghosh-Swaby OR, Goodman SG, Leiter LA, Cheng A, Connelly KA, Fitchett D, Jüni P, Farkouh ME, Udell JA. Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies, atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and heart failure in people with or at risk of type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:418–435. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30038-3
    1. Lim S, Oh TJ, Dawson J, Sattar N. Diabetes drugs and stroke risk: Intensive versus conventional glucose-lowering strategies, and implications of recent cardiovascular outcome trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22:6–15. doi: 10.1111/dom.13850
    1. Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, Docherty KF, Sattar N, Preiss D, Køber L, Petrie MC, McMurray JJV. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:776–785. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30249-9
    1. Bellastella G, Maiorino MI, Longo M, Scappaticcio L, Chiodini P, Esposito K, Giugliano D. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists and prevention of stroke systematic review of cardiovascular outcome trials with meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020;51:666–669. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027557
    1. Malhotra K, Katsanos AH, Lambadiari V, Goyal N, Palaiodimou L, Kosmidou M, Krogias C, Alexandrov AV, Tsivgoulis G. GLP-1 receptor agonists in diabetes for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2020;267:2117–2122. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09813-4
    1. Sattar N, Lee MMY, Kristensen SL, Branch KRH, Del Prato S, Khurmi NS, Lam CSP, Lopes RD, McMurray JJV, Pratley RE, et al. . Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:653–662. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00203-5
    1. Collins L, Costello RA. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. [updated 2020 Jun 25]. In: StatPearls [internet]. StatPearls publishing; 2021. Available at: . Accessed Oct 2021.
    1. Gilbert MP, Pratley RE. GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitors in Type 2 diabetes therapy: review of head-to-head clinical trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:178. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00178
    1. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, Benetos A, Biffi A, Boavida JM, Capodanno D, et al. ; ESC National Cardiac Societies; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 10. Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45:S144–S174. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S010
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Rosenstock J, Seufert J, Warren ML, et al. ; SUSTAIN-6 Investigators. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141
    1. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, Dungan K, Eliaschewitz FG, Franco DR, Jeppesen OK, Lingvay I, Mosenzon O, Pedersen SD, et al. ; PIONEER 6 Investigators. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:841–851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
    1. Adams HP, Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE, 3rd. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35
    1. Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP. Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation. 2016;133:601–609. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719
    1. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018;27:740–756. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001
    1. Zelniker TA, Wiviott SD, Raz I, Im K, Goodrich EL, Furtado RHM, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. . Comparison of the Effects of glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2019;139:2022–2031. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038868
    1. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Riesmeyer JS, Riddle MC, Rydén L, et al. ; REWIND Investigators. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:121–130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3
    1. Lăcătușu CM, Grigorescu ED, Stătescu C, Sascău RA, Onofriescu A, Mihai BM. Association of antihyperglycemic therapy with risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke in diabetic patients. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55:E592. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090592
    1. Buse JB, Bain SC, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Pratley RE, Linder M, Monk Fries T, et al. ; LEADER Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular risk reduction with liraglutide: an exploratory mediation analysis of the LEADER trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:1546–1552. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2251
    1. Nauck MA, Meier JJ, Cavender MA, Abd El Aziz M, Drucker DJ. Cardiovascular actions and clinical outcomes with glucagon-like Peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors. Circulation. 2017;136:849–870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028136
    1. Larsson M, Patrone C, von Euler M, Holst JJ, Nathanson D. GLP-1 secretion in acute ischemic stroke: association with functional outcome and comparison with healthy individuals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18:91. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0896-z
    1. Maskery MP, Holscher C, Jones SP, Price CI, Strain WD, Watkins CL, Werring DJ, Emsley HC. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as neuroprotective agents for ischemic stroke: a systematic scoping review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41:14–30. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20952011
    1. Gerstein HC, Hart R, Colhoun HM, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Botros FT, Probstfield J, Riddle MC, Rydén L, Atisso CM, et al. . The effect of dulaglutide on stroke: an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:106–114. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30423-1
    1. Rybelsus. Summary of product characteristics. Available at: . Accessed Sept 2021.
    1. Ozempic. Summary of product characteristics. Available at . Accessed Sept 2021.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다