Left ventricular function: time-varying elastance and left ventricular aortic coupling

Keith R Walley, Keith R Walley

Abstract

Many aspects of left ventricular function are explained by considering ventricular pressure-volume characteristics. Contractility is best measured by the slope, Emax, of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship. Ventricular systole is usefully characterized by a time-varying elastance (ΔP/ΔV). An extended area, the pressure-volume area, subtended by the ventricular pressure-volume loop (useful mechanical work) and the ESPVR (energy expended without mechanical work), is linearly related to myocardial oxygen consumption per beat. For energetically efficient systolic ejection ventricular elastance should be, and is, matched to aortic elastance. Without matching, the fraction of energy expended without mechanical work increases and energy is lost during ejection across the aortic valve. Ventricular function curves, derived from ventricular pressure-volume characteristics, interact with venous return curves to regulate cardiac output. Thus, consideration of ventricular pressure-volume relationships highlight features that allow the heart to efficiently respond to any demand for cardiac output and oxygen delivery.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
This classic ventricular function curve relates input of the heart (end-diastolic pressure in mmHg) to output of the heart (cardiac output in liters per minute). The ventricular function curve shifts up and to the left when ventricular systolic contractility increases. However, increased diastolic compliance and decreased afterload can also shift the ventricular function curve up and to the left
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
For an isolated rabbit trabecular muscle strip, force, expressed as force per area = tension, is plotted against starting length. Passive tension during diastole is plotted as open circles. Normal active tension after electrical stimulation is plotted as closed circles. Contractions following a second rapid electrical stimulation, which increases the calcium concentration at actin/myosin sliding filaments and therefore increases contractility (Potentiated), is plotted as open triangles
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Left ventricular pressure volume relationships. A cardiac cycle is illustrated by the loop labeled as “a”, “b”, “c”, and “d”. ESPVR end-systolic pressure–volume relationship, LV left ventricular
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Three differently loaded cardiac cycles. The end-systolic pressure–volume points all lie on a line termed the end-systolic pressure–volume relationship (ESPVR). The slope of the ESPVR is Emax, maximum elastance. At any time during systolic contraction (e.g., 50-ms time points are shown as filled circles) a line can be drawn connecting pressure–volume points from each of the differently loaded contractions defining elastance (ΔP/ΔV) at that time point. Ventricular systolic contraction can therefore be regarded as a time-varying elastance
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pressure–volume area (PVA) is the area within the cardiac cycle pressure–volume (P-V) loop plus the area under the ESPVR. PVA linearly correlates with myocardial oxygen consumption. LV left ventricular
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Stroke volume, derived from the left-hand panel, multiplied by heart rate yields cardiac output on the right-hand panel. Thus, for a given ESPVR, diastolic pressure–volume relationship, and afterload, a range of end-diastolic pressures on the left-hand panel yield the ventricular function curve on the right-hand panel. LV left ventricular
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
An arterial elastance line can be added to a PVA diagram (Fig. 5) by considering the rise in pressure within the arterial system with an increase in arterial volume (equals the decrease in ventricular volume). Compared with the healthy state (top panel), a decrease in ventricular elastance and an increase in arterial elastance mean that more energy is wasted on the PVA diagram. LV left ventricular, P-V pressure–volume
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Lowering right atrial pressure increases blood flow back to the heart—venous return. This venous return curve can be shifted, primarily by an increase in the x-axis intercept—mean systemic pressure. RVR resistance to venous return
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Ventricular function curves can be plotted on the same set of axes and venous return curves. In steady state cardiac output must equal venous return so the intersection (filled circle) identifies the cardiac output and end-diastolic pressure of the cardiovascular system. A decrease in cardiac function results in a decrease in cardiac output and an increase in end-diastolic pressure (open circle)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Top: in a normal heart increased contractility does not change the normally steep ventricular function curve so this does not change cardiac output much. In contrast, changes in venous return cause large changes in cardiac output so, in health, cardiac output is primarily controlled by the peripheral circulation. Bottom: in a failing heart changes in venous return curves no longer result in substantial changes in cardiac output but raise venous pressure (solid circle to open circle on bottom ventricular function curve). Now an increase in contractility results in a substantial increase in cardiac output and decrease in end-diastolic pressure (filled circle on lower ventricular function curve to filled circle on upper ventricular function curve)

References

    1. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. How to quantify pump function of the heart. The value of variables derived from measurements on isolated muscle. Circ Res. 1979;44(3):303–8. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.44.3.303.
    1. Katz AM. Ernest Henry Starling, his predecessors, and the “Law of the Heart”. Circulation. 2002;106(23):2986–92. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000040594.96123.55.
    1. Imperial ES, Levy MN, Zieske H. Outflow resistance as an independent determinant of cardiac performance. Circ Res. 1961;9(6):1148–55. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.9.6.1148.
    1. Weber KT, Janicki JS, Reeves RC, Hefner LL, Reeves TJ. Determinants of stroke volume in the isolated canine heart. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37(5):742–7.
    1. Sarnoff SJ, Berglund E. Ventricular function. I. Starling’s law of the heart studied by means of simultaneous right and left ventricular function curves in the dog. Circulation. 1954;9(5):706–18. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.9.5.706.
    1. Paley HW, McDonald IG, Blumenthal J, Mailhot J. The effects of posture and isoproterenol on the velocity of left ventricular contraction in man. The reciprocal relationship between left ventricular volume and myocardial wall force during ejection on mean rate of circumferential shortening. J Clin Invest. 1971;50:2283–94. doi: 10.1172/JCI106726.
    1. Glower DD, Spratt JA, Snow ND, Kabas JS, Davis JW, Olsen CO, Tyson GS, Sabiston DC, Jr, Rankin JS. Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: the concept of preload recruitable stroke work. Circulation. 1985;71(5):994–1009. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.71.5.994.
    1. Noble MI. Problems concerning the application of concepts of muscle mechanics to the determination of the contractile state of the heart. Circulation. 1972;45(2):252–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.45.2.252.
    1. Little WC. The left ventricular dP/dtmax-end-diastolic volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res. 1985;56(6):808–15. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.56.6.808.
    1. Chiu YC, Walley KR, Ford LE. Comparison of the effects of different inotropic interventions on force, velocity, and power in rabbit myocardium. Circ Res. 1989;65(5):1161–71. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.65.5.1161.
    1. Sagawa K. End-systolic pressure-volume relationship in retrospect and prospect. Fed Proc. 1984;43(9):2399–401.
    1. Suga H, Sagawa K. Mathematical interrelationship between instantaneous ventricular pressure-volume ratio and myocardial force-velocity relation. Ann Biomed Eng. 1972;1(2):160–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02584205.
    1. Sagawa K, Suga H, Shoukas AA, Bakalar KM. End-systolic pressure/volume ratio: a new index of ventricular contractility. Am J Cardiol. 1977;40(5):748–53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(77)90192-8.
    1. Glantz SA, Kernoff RS. Muscle stiffness determined from canine left ventricular pressure-volume curves. Circ Res. 1975;37(6):787–94. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.37.6.787.
    1. Tyberg JV, Smith ER. Ventricular diastole and the role of the pericardium. Herz. 1990;15(6):354–61.
    1. Holt JP, Rhode EA, Kines H. Pericardial and ventricular pressure. Circ Res. 1960;8:1171–81. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.8.6.1171.
    1. Nikolic S, Yellin EL, Tamura K, Vetter H, Tamura T, Meisner JS, Frater RW. Passive properties of canine left ventricle: diastolic stiffness and restoring forces. Circ Res. 1988;62(6):1210–22. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.62.6.1210.
    1. Walley KR, Cooper DJ. Diastolic stiffness impairs left ventricular function during hypovolemic shock in pigs. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(3 Pt 2):H702–12.
    1. Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Factors which affect the diastolic pressure-volume curve. Circ Res. 1978;42(2):171–80. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.42.2.171.
    1. Glantz SA, Misbach GA, Moores WY, Mathey DG, Lekven J, Stowe DF, Parmley WW, Tyberg JV. The pericardium substantially affects the left ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relationship in the dog. Circ Res. 1978;42(3):433–41. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.42.3.433.
    1. Mahler F, Ross J, Jr, O'Rourke RA, Covell JW. Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog. Am J Cardiol. 1975;35(5):626–34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90048-X.
    1. Suga H, Sagawa K. Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1974;35(1):117–26. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.35.1.117.
    1. Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukas AA. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res. 1973;32(3):314–22. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.32.3.314.
    1. Suga H. Theoretical analysis of a left-ventricular pumping model based on the systolic time-varying pressure-volume ratio. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1971;18(1):47–55. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1971.4502789.
    1. Suga H, Yamada O, Goto Y, Igarashi Y. Peak isovolumic pressure-volume relation of puppy left ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1986;250(2 Pt 2):H167–72.
    1. Khalafbeigui F, Suga H, Sagawa K. Left ventricular systolic pressure-volume area correlates with oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol. 1979;237(5):H566–9.
    1. Suga H, Hayashi T, Shirahata M. Ventricular systolic pressure-volume area as predictor of cardiac oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol. 1981;240(1):H39–44.
    1. Suga H, Hisano R, Goto Y, Yamada O, Igarashi Y. Effect of positive inotropic agents on the relation between oxygen consumption and systolic pressure volume area in canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1983;53(3):306–18. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.53.3.306.
    1. Suga H, Hisano R, Hirata S, Hayashi T, Yamada O, Ninomiya I. Heart rate-independent energetics and systolic pressure-volume area in dog heart. Am J Physiol. 1983;244(2):H206–14.
    1. Suga H, Goto Y, Futaki S, Kawaguchi O, Yaku H, Hata K, Takasago T. Systolic pressure-volume area (PVA) as the energy of contraction in Starling’s law of the heart. Heart Vessels. 1991;6(2):65–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02058751.
    1. Rooke GA, Feigl EO. Work as a correlate of canine left ventricular oxygen consumption, and the problem of catecholamine oxygen wasting. Circ Res. 1982;50(2):273–86. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.50.2.273.
    1. Burkhoff D, Sagawa K. Ventricular efficiency predicted by an analytical model. Am J Physiol. 1986;250(6 Pt 2):R1021–7.
    1. De Tombe PP, Jones S, Burkhoff D, Hunter WC, Kass DA. Ventricular stroke work and efficiency both remain nearly optimal despite altered vascular loading. Am J Physiol. 1993;264(6 Pt 2):H1817–24.
    1. Magder S, Veerassamy S, Bates JH. A further analysis of why pulmonary venous pressure rises after the onset of LV dysfunction. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009;106(1):81–90. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90618.2008.
    1. Mitzner W, Goldberg H. Effects of epinephrine on resisitive and compliant properties of the canine vasculature. J Appl Physiol. 1975;39(2):272–80.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다