Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury With a Machine Learning Algorithm Using Electronic Health Record Data

Hamid Mohamadlou, Anna Lynn-Palevsky, Christopher Barton, Uli Chettipally, Lisa Shieh, Jacob Calvert, Nicholas R Saber, Ritankar Das, Hamid Mohamadlou, Anna Lynn-Palevsky, Christopher Barton, Uli Chettipally, Lisa Shieh, Jacob Calvert, Nicholas R Saber, Ritankar Das

Abstract

Background: A major problem in treating acute kidney injury (AKI) is that clinical criteria for recognition are markers of established kidney damage or impaired function; treatment before such damage manifests is desirable. Clinicians could intervene during what may be a crucial stage for preventing permanent kidney injury if patients with incipient AKI and those at high risk of developing AKI could be identified.

Objective: In this study, we evaluate a machine learning algorithm for early detection and prediction of AKI.

Design: We used a machine learning technique, boosted ensembles of decision trees, to train an AKI prediction tool on retrospective data taken from more than 300 000 inpatient encounters.

Setting: Data were collected from inpatient wards at Stanford Medical Center and intensive care unit patients at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Patients: Patients older than the age of 18 whose hospital stays lasted between 5 and 1000 hours and who had at least one documented measurement of heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, serum creatinine (SCr), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).

Measurements: We tested the algorithm's ability to detect AKI at onset and to predict AKI 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours before onset.

Methods: We tested AKI detection and prediction using the National Health Service (NHS) England AKI Algorithm as a gold standard. We additionally tested the algorithm's ability to detect AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. We compared the algorithm's 3-fold cross-validation performance to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for AKI identification in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).

Results: The algorithm demonstrated high AUROC for detecting and predicting NHS-defined AKI at all tested time points. The algorithm achieves AUROC of 0.872 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.867-0.878) for AKI detection at time of onset. For prediction 12 hours before onset, the algorithm achieves an AUROC of 0.800 (95% CI, 0.792-0.809). For 24-hour predictions, the algorithm achieves AUROC of 0.795 (95% CI, 0.785-0.804). For 48-hour and 72-hour predictions, the algorithm achieves AUROC values of 0.761 (95% CI, 0.753-0.768) and 0.728 (95% CI, 0.719-0.737), respectively.

Limitations: Because of the retrospective nature of this study, we cannot draw any conclusions about the impact the algorithm's predictions will have on patient outcomes in a clinical setting.

Conclusions: The results of these experiments suggest that a machine learning-based AKI prediction tool may offer important prognostic capabilities for determining which patients are likely to suffer AKI, potentially allowing clinicians to intervene before kidney damage manifests.

Keywords: acute kidney injury; machine learning.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Mohamadlou, Barton, Calvert, Lynn-Palevsky, Saber, and Das are employees of Dascena, developers of the predictive algorithm. Shieh reports receiving grant funding from Dascena.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Inclusion criteria for patients in the BIDMC and Stanford data sets. Note. Patients who met all inclusion criteria were included in this study. BIDMC = Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. aRequired measurements include heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, Glasgow Coma Scale, and serum creatinine.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and area under the receiver operating characteristic for machine learning algorithm 0-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hour advance prediction of stage 2 or stage 3 acute kidney injury development for BIDMC patient data. Note. BIDMC = Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and area under the receiver operating characteristic for machine learning algorithm 0-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hour advance prediction of stage 2 or stage 3 acute kidney injury development for Stanford Medical Center patient data.

References

    1. Waikar SS, Liu KD, Chertow GM. Diagnosis, epidemiology, and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(3):844-861. doi:10.2215/CJN.05191107.
    1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(11):3365-3370. doi:10.1681/ASN.2004090740.
    1. Silver SA, Long J, Zheng Y, Chertow GM. Cost of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(2):70-76.
    1. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11:R31. doi:10.1186/cc5713.
    1. Metnitz PG, Krenn CG, Steltzer H, et al. Effect of acute renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy on outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2051-2058.
    1. De Corte W, Dhondt A, Vanholder R, et al. Long-term outcome in ICU patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2016;20:256. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1409-z.
    1. Kolhe NV, Staples D, Reilly T, et al. Impact of compliance with a care bundle on acute kidney injury outcomes: a prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132279.
    1. Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, et al. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1-138.
    1. Star RA. Treatment of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 1998;54(6):1817-1831.
    1. Praught ML, Shlipak MG. Are small changes in serum creatinine an important risk factor? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14:265-270.
    1. Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, et al. Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: the PICARD experience. Kidney Int. 2004;66(4):1613-1621. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00927.x.
    1. Hoste EAJ, Clermont G, Kersten A, et al. RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis. Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R73. doi:10.1186/cc4915.
    1. Koyner JL, Adhikari R, Edelson DP, Churpek MM. Development of a multicenter ward-based AKI prediction model. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:1935-1943.
    1. Fletchet M, Guiza F, Chetz M, et al. AKIpredictor, an online prognostic calculator for acute kidney injury in adult critically ill patients: development, validation and comparison to serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(6):764-773. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4678-3.
    1. Kate RJ, Perez RM, Mazumdar D, Pasupathy KS, Nilakantan V. Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults. BMC Med Informat Decis Making. 2016;16:39. doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4.
    1. Porter CJ, Juurlink I, Bisset LH, Bavakunji R, Mehta RL, Devonald MA. A real-time electronic alert to improve detection of acute kidney injury in a large teaching hospital. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(10):1888-1893. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfu082.
    1. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707-710. doi:10.1007/BF01709751.
    1. De Mendonca A, Vincent JL, Suter PM, et al. Acute renal failure in the ICU: risk factors and outcome evaluated by the SOFA score. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:915-921.
    1. Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data. 2016;3: 160035. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
    1. Mao Q, Jay M, Hoffman JL, et al. Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU. 2017. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e017833.
    1. Selby NM, Hill R, Fluck RJ. Standardizing the early identification of acute kidney injury: the NHS England national patient safety alert. Nephron. 2015; 131:113-117. doi:10.1159/000439146.
    1. Kellum JA, Lameire N. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). On behalf of the KDIGO guideline AKI group. Crit Care. 2013;17(1):204. doi:10.1186/cc11454.
    1. Ricci Z, Cruz D, Ronco C. The RIFLE criteria and mortality in acute kidney injury: a systematic review. Kidney Int. 2008;73(5):538-546.
    1. Schuur JD, Chambers JG, Hou PC. Urinary catheter use and appropriateness in U.S. emergency departments, 1995-2010. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:292-300.
    1. Závada J, Hoste E, Cartin-Ceba R, et al. A comparison of three methods to estimate baseline creatinine for RIFLE classification. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(12):3911-3918.
    1. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Paper presented at the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; August 2016; San Francisco, CA, USA.
    1. Pandharipande PP, Shintani AK, Hagerman HE, et al. Derivation and validation of SpO2/FiO2 ratio to impute for PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(4):1317-1321. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819cefa9.
    1. Palevsky PM, Liu KD, Brophy PD, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61(5):649-672.
    1. Calvert JS, Price DA, Chettipally UK, et al. A computational approach to early sepsis detection. Comp Biol Med. 2016;74:69-73.
    1. Desautels T, Calvert J, Hoffman J, et al. Prediction of sepsis in the intensive care unit with minimal electronic health record data: a machine learning approach. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4(3):e28.
    1. Calvert J, Desautels T, Chettipally U, et al. High-performance detection and early prediction of septic shock for alcohol-use disorder patients. Ann Med Surg. 2016;8:50-55.
    1. Shimabukuro D, Barton CW, Feldman MD, Mataraso SJ, Das R. Effect of a machine learning-based severe sepsis prediction algorithm on patient survival and hospital length of stay: a randomized clinical trial. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017;4:e000234.
    1. McCoy A, Das R. Reducing patient mortality, length of stay and readmissions through machine learning-based sepsis prediction in the emergency department, intensive care unit and hospital floor units. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6:e000158. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000158.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다