An Internet-Based Intervention (Condom-Him) to Increase Condom Use Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Joyal Miranda, José Côté, Gaston Godin, Martin Blais, Joanne Otis, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Ghayas Fadel, Luisa Barton, Shawn Fowler, Joyal Miranda, José Côté, Gaston Godin, Martin Blais, Joanne Otis, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, Ghayas Fadel, Luisa Barton, Shawn Fowler

Abstract

Background: In the recent years, the Internet has been used as a medium to find sexual partners and engage in risky sexual behavior. This has changed the way in which men having have sex with men (MSM) seek sexual partners and has increased the number of high-risk sexual encounters. Therefore, developers of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-prevention interventions have also started using the Internet as a viable medium to promote safe sexual behaviors. However, much of the efforts thus far have been aimed at HIV-negative rather than HIV-positive MSM. HIV-positive individuals continue to engage in risky sexual behaviors and thus constitute an important group in which HIV prevention strategies need to be addressed. Therefore, HIV prevention in HIV-positive MSM is a critical issue.

Objective: Condom-Him, an Internet-based intervention tailored to increase condom use among HIV-positive MSM, was developed with the aim of improving condom use, self-efficacy, and intentions to use condoms among these individuals. The acceptability and feasibility of this Internet-based intervention will be examined in a pilot study.

Methods: We will perform a randomized controlled parallel-group superiority trial. HIV-positive MSM who currently engage in unprotected anal sex will be recruited for the study. Participants will be randomly assigned using a one-to-one allocation ratio generated by the computer program. The researchers will be blinded to participant's group assignment. Participants will be assigned either to use the Condom-Him intervention (experimental arm) or to view a list of websites containing HIV/AIDS related information (control arm). Self-administered questionnaires will be provided online before randomization (baseline) and two weeks after intervention (post-test).

Results: The study will include a total of 60 participants with 30 in each group. The results from this pilot study will provide further evidence for a larger study to examine the effectiveness of this intervention and will provide a cost-effective and widely accessible approach to HIV prevention for HIV-positive MSM.

Conclusions: Internet-based interventions for HIV-positive MSM, a population that has been under-represented in the efforts for positive prevention of HIV within Canada, have the potential to provide a cost-effective strategy, which influences the way in which information is accessed and provided to high-risk individuals. The advantages of an Internet-based intervention include the potential to provide consistency in the delivery of an intervention and the ability to disseminate the intervention to a wider population. Internet-based interventions are perceived as vital tools in combating HIV infection within the realm of social media. Therefore, it is important to determine the feasibility and acceptability of these interventions before implementing them.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01726153; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01726153 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6Jljzip8B).

Keywords: HIV prevention; HIV-positive; condom use; intention; intervention; men having sex with men; pilot study; self-efficacy.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants through randomized control trial. As the study is in progress, some n='s are left blank.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A screenshot of the Condom-Him intervention study.

References

    1. Public Health Agency of Canada . HIV/AIDSEpiUpdates. Ottawa, Canada: Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada; 2010. National HIV Prevalence and Incidence Estimates in Canada for 2008; pp. 1–7.
    1. Crepaz N, Lyles CM, Wolitski RJ, Passin WF, Rama SM, Herbst JH, Purcell DW, Malow RM, Stall R, HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis (PRS) Team Do prevention interventions reduce HIV risk behaviours among people living with HIV? A meta-analytic review of controlled trials. AIDS. 2006 Jan 9;20(2):143–57. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000196166.48518.a0.
    1. Eaton LA, Kalichman SC. Changes in transmission risk behaviors across stages of HIV disease among people living with HIV. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(1):39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2008.10.005.
    1. Crepaz N, Marks G. Towards an understanding of sexual risk behavior in people living with HIV: a review of social, psychological, and medical findings. AIDS. 2002 Jan 25;16(2):135–49.
    1. Rebchook G, Curotto A, Levine D. Centre for AIDS Prevention Studies. [2013-09-24]. How does the Internet affect HIV prevention? .
    1. Rosser BR, Wilkerson JM, Smolenski DJ, Oakes JM, Konstan J, Horvath KJ, Kilian GR, Novak DS, Danilenko GP, Morgan R. The future of Internet-based HIV prevention: a report on key findings from the Men's INTernet (MINTS-I, II) Sex Studies. AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr;15 Suppl 1:S91–100. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9910-5.
    1. Noar SM. Computer technology-based interventions in HIV prevention: state of the evidence and future directions for research. AIDS Care. 2011 May;23(5):525–33. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.516349.
    1. Noar SM, Black HG, Pierce LB. Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: a meta-analysis. AIDS. 2009 Jan 2;23(1):107–15. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831c5500.
    1. Murray E, Khadjesari Z, White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, McCambridge J, Thompson SG, Wallace P. Methodological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1052.
    1. Gilliam PP, Straub DM. Prevention with positives: a review of published research, 1998-2008. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(2):92–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2008.11.001.
    1. Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, van Empelen P, Brug J. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol. 2004 Jan;9(1):85–98. doi: 10.1177/1359105304038379.
    1. Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
    1. Schutz M, Godin G, Kok G, Vézina-Im LA, Naccache H, Otis J, MAYA Study Group Determinants of condom use among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS. 2011 Jul;22(7):391–7. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010205.
    1. Miranda J. Participants’ Preferences for HIV Prevention Interventions dissertation thesis. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto; 2010. Apr 13, pp. 1–128.
    1. Sidani S, Epstein DR, Bootzin RR, Moritz P, Miranda J. Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure. Res Nurs Health. 2009 Aug;32(4):419–31. doi: 10.1002/nur.20329.
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다