Corticospinal reorganization after locomotor training in a person with motor incomplete paraplegia

Nupur Hajela, Chaithanya K Mummidisetty, Andrew C Smith, Maria Knikou, Nupur Hajela, Chaithanya K Mummidisetty, Andrew C Smith, Maria Knikou

Abstract

Activity-dependent plasticity as a result of reorganization of neural circuits is a fundamental characteristic of the central nervous system that occurs simultaneously in multiple sites. In this study, we established the effects of subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex region on the tibialis anterior (TA) long-latency flexion reflex. Neurophysiological tests were conducted before and after robotic gait training in one person with a motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) while at rest and during robotic-assisted stepping. The TA flexion reflex was evoked following nonnociceptive sural nerve stimulation and was conditioned by TMS at 0.9 TA motor evoked potential resting threshold at conditioning-test intervals that ranged from 70 to 130 ms. Subthreshold TMS induced a significant facilitation on the TA flexion reflex before training, which was reversed to depression after training with the subject seated at rest. During stepping, corticospinal facilitation of the flexion reflex at early and midstance phases before training was replaced with depression at early and midswing followed by facilitation at late swing after training. These results constitute the first neurophysiologic evidence that locomotor training reorganizes the cortical control of spinal interneuronal circuits that generate patterned motor activity, modifying spinal reflex function, in the chronic lesioned human spinal cord.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
EMG activity during robotic-assisted stepping before and after training. (a)–(f) EMG activity of the right side muscles during robotic-assisted stepping at 50% BWS and at 1.8 Km/h before and after training as a function of the step cycle. (g) Mean EMG amplitude for stepping before (black squares) and after (red squares) 35 sessions of robotic gait training. EMG: electromyography; SOL: soleus; MG: medial gastrocnemius; TA: tibialis anterior; PL: peroneus longus; MH: medial hamstrings; GRC: gracilis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of subthreshold TMS on the TA flexion reflex while seated before and after BWS robotic gait training. (a) Full-wave rectified waveform averages (n = 10) of the control tibialis anterior (TA) flexion reflex (grey line) and the conditioned flexion reflex following single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the right primary motor cortex at 0.9 TA motor evoked potentials (MEPs) resting threshold. (b) Mean amplitude of the conditioned TA flexion reflexes recorded before and after BWS robotic gait training with the seated subject. The conditioning-test interval is denoted on the abscissa. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the conditioned TA flexion reflexes recorded before and after training. Error bars denote the SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in cortical control of the flexion reflex after 30 sessions of BWS robotic gait training during robotic-assisted stepping. The mean normalized long-latency tibialis anterior (TA) flexion reflex following single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the right primary motor cortex at 0.9 × TA motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the conditioning-test interval of 70 (a) and 110 (b) ms is indicated as a function of the step cycle. Asterisks indicate suppressive and/or facilitatory conditioned flexion reflexes after locomotor training compared to those observed before training based on the P value computed from pairwise multiple comparisons (two-way ANOVA along with Holm-Sidak tests). Grey squares denote the stance phase. Error bars denote the SEM.

References

    1. Rossignol S, Barrière G, Frigon A, et al. Plasticity of locomotor sensorimotor interactions after peripheral and/or spinal lesions. Brain Research Reviews. 2008;57(1):228–240.
    1. Edgerton VR, Tillakaratne NJK, Bigbee AJ, de Leon RD, Roy RR. Plasticity of the spinal neural circuitry after injury. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2004;27:145–167.
    1. Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG. The role of the motor cortex in the control of accuracy of locomotor movements in the cat. Journal of Physiology. 1993;461:1–25.
    1. Beloozerova IN, Farrell BJ, Sirota MG, Prilutsky BI. Differences in movement mechanics, electromyographic, and motor cortex activity between accurate and nonaccurate stepping. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010;103(4):2285–2300.
    1. Drew T, Andujar JE, Lajoie K, Yakovenko S. Cortical mechanisms involved in visuomotor coordination during precision walking. Brain Research Reviews. 2008;57(1):199–211.
    1. Armstrong DM, Drew T. Discharges of pyramidal tract and other motor cortical neurones during locomotion in the cat. Journal of Physiology. 1984;346:471–495.
    1. Armstrong DM, Drew T. Locomotor-related neuronal discharges in cat motor cortex compared with peripheral receptive fields and evoked movements. Journal of Physiology. 1984;346:497–517.
    1. Drew T. Motor cortical activity during voluntary gait modifications in the cat. I. Cells related to the forelimbs. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1993;70(1):179–199.
    1. Barthélemy D, Grey MJ, Nielsen JB, Bouyer L. Involvement of the corticospinal tract in the control of human gait. Progress in Brain Research. 2011;192:181–197.
    1. Nielsen J, Petersen N, Fedirchuk B. Evidence suggesting a transcortical pathway from cutaneous foot afferents to tibialis anterior motoneurones in man. Journal of Physiology. 1997;501(2):473–484.
    1. Barthélemy D, Willerslev-Olsen M, Lundell H, et al. Impaired transmission in the corticospinal tract and gait disability in spinal cord injured persons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010;104(2):1167–1176.
    1. Dobkin BH. Functional rewiring of brain and spinal cord after injury: the three Rs of neural repair and neurological rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2000;13(6):655–659.
    1. Wolpaw JR, Tennissen AM. Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2001;24:807–843.
    1. Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66(4):484–493.
    1. Knikou M. Neural control of locomotion and training-induced plasticity after spinal and cerebral lesions. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2010;121(10):1655–1668.
    1. Knikou M. Plasticity of corticospinal neural control after locomotor training in human spinal cord injury. Neural Plasticity. 2012;2012254948
    1. Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2005;19(4):313–324.
    1. Thomas SL, Gorassini MA. Increases in corticospinal tract function by treadmill training after incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2005;94(4):2844–2855.
    1. Sherrington CS. Flexion-reflex of the limb, crossed extension-reflex and reflex stepping and standing. The Journal of Physiology. 1910;40:28–121.
    1. Knikou M. Plantar cutaneous input modulates differently spinal reflexes in subjects with intact and injured spinal cord. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(1):69–77.
    1. Knikou M. Plantar cutaneous afferents normalize the reflex modulation patterns during stepping in chronic human spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010;103(3):1304–1314.
    1. Knikou M, Angeli CA, Ferreira CK, Harkema SJ. Flexion reflex modulation during stepping in human spinal cord injury. Experimental Brain Research. 2009;196(3):341–351.
    1. Knikou M, Hajela N, Mummidisetty CK, Xiao M, Smith AC. Soleus H-reflex phase-dependent modulation is preserved during stepping within a robotic exoskeleton. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011;122(7):1396–1404.
    1. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2000;23:393–415.
    1. Feldman DE. Synaptic mechanisms for plasticity in neocortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2009;32:33–55.
    1. Butz M, Wörgötter F, van Ooyen A. Activity-dependent structural plasticity. Brain Research Reviews. 2009;60(2):287–305.
    1. Valls-Solé J, Pascual-Leone A, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1992;85(6):355–364.
    1. Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Experimental Brain Research. 1998;119(2):265–268.
    1. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. Journal of Physiology. 1993;471:501–519.
    1. Cowan JMA, Day BL, Marsden C, Rothwell JC. The effect of percutaneous motor cortex stimulation on H reflexes in muscles of the arm and leg in intact man. Journal of Physiology. 1986;377:333–347.
    1. Rossi A, Zalaffi A, Decchi B. Interaction of nociceptive and non-nociceptive cutaneous afferents from foot sole in common reflex pathways to tibialis anterior motoneurones in humans. Brain Research. 1996;714(1-2):76–86.
    1. Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Cruccu G, Priori A, Manfredi M. Corticospinal potentials after transcranial stimulation in humans. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1989;52(8):970–974.
    1. Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007;21(1):25–35.
    1. Turiel M, Sitia S, Cicala S, et al. Robotic treadmill training improves cardiovascular function in spinal cord injury patients. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011;149(3):323–329.
    1. Wolpaw JR, O’Keefe JA. Adaptive plasticity in the primate spinal stretch reflex: evidence for a two-phase process. Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;4(11):2718–2724.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다