One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}

M Edqvist, H G Dahlen, C Häggsgård, H Tern, K Ängeby, G Tegerstedt, P Teleman, G Ajne, C Rubertsson, M Edqvist, H G Dahlen, C Häggsgård, H Tern, K Ängeby, G Tegerstedt, P Teleman, G Ajne, C Rubertsson

Abstract

Background: Severe perineal trauma sustained during childbirth is a serious complication since it can lead to both short- and long-term consequences for women. Some of the methods used to prevent perineal injuries have been evaluated in clinical trials, but there are still gaps in the evidence. A new clinical practice has been introduced, adopted by more than half of the maternity wards in Sweden with the aim of reducing severe perineal trauma. This procedure involves two midwives assisting the woman during the second stage of labour.

Methods/design: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 2946 women will be randomised to be assisted by one or two midwives during the second stage of labour. Women age 18-47, who plan for their first vaginal birth, with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, will be asked to participate when admitted to the maternity ward. Five maternity wards comprising 19,500 births/year in different parts of Sweden will participate in this study. The sample size is powered to demonstrate a 50% reduction (from 4.1-2.0%) in primary outcome, which is the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree). Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes, women's experiences, midwives' experiences of the intervention, incontinence, and pelvic floor symptoms. The primary analysis is intention to treat. Questionnaires will be sent to the women at 1 month and 1 year after the birth to assess women's experiences, pain, incontinence, pelvic floor symptoms, sexual function, and mental health.

Discussion: It is important for care during labour and birth to be evidence based. There is a strong desire among midwives to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma. This may lead to new strategies and practices being implemented into practice without scientific evidence. The intervention might have negative side effects or unintended consequences. On the other hand, there is a possibility of the intervention improving care for women. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03770962 . Registered on 10 December 2018.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
One Plus One Equals Two—will that do? Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments

References

    1. Reid AJ, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Roos AM, Thakar R. Outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after three years. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(1):47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.04.013.
    1. Jango H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthoj S, Sakse A. Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury and the risk of long-term anal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):733.e1–733e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.030.
    1. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1199–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.064.
    1. Fodstad K, Staff AC, Laine K. Sexual activity and dyspareunia the first year postpartum in relation to degree of perineal trauma. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1513–1523. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3015-7.
    1. Priddis H, Dahlen H, Schmied V. Women’s experiences following severe perineal trauma: a meta-ethnographic synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(4):748–759. doi: 10.1111/jan.12005.
    1. Lindqvist M, Lindberg I, Nilsson M, Uustal E, Persson M. “Struggling to settle with a damaged body” - a Swedish qualitative study of women’s experiences one year after obstetric anal sphincter muscle injury (OASIS) at childbirth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019;19:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.11.002.
    1. Iles D, Khan R, Naidoo K, Kearney R, Myers J, Reid F. The impact of anal sphincter injury on perceived body image. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;212:140–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.024.
    1. Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Bordahl PE, Rasmussen S. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):25–34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e2f50b.
    1. Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Heinonen S. A prior cesarean section and incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1331–1339. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2006-6.
    1. Raisanen SH, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1365–1372. doi: 10.3109/00016340903295626.
    1. Elvander C, Ahlberg M, Edqvist M, Stephansson O. Severe perineal trauma among women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a population-based cohort study. Birth (Berkeley, Calif) 2019;46(2):379–386. doi: 10.1111/birt.12402.
    1. Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, Lukasse M. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:Cd006672.
    1. Dahlen HG, Priddis H, Thornton C. Severe perineal trauma is rising, but let us not overreact. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.004.
    1. Kopas ML. A review of evidence-based practices for management of the second stage of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(3):264–276. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12199.
    1. Emanuelsson Å, Lönnqvist P. Barnmorskans upplevelse av kollegial närvaro under förlossningens utdrivningsskede [Magisteruppsats]. Akademin för vård, arbetsliv och välfärd, Borås Högskola; 2015. Available from: .
    1. CONSORT statement - transparent reporting of trials 2010. Available from: . Accessed 24 Oct 2019.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Cox JL, Holden J, Henshaw C. Perinatal mental health: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) London: RCPsych Publications; 2014.
    1. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
    1. Teleman P, Stenzelius K, Iorizzo L, Jakobsson U. Validation of the Swedish short forms of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(5):483–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01085.x.
    1. Pihl S, Uustal E, Blomberg M. Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(6):939–944. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3838-5.
    1. The Swedish Pregnancy Register - Annual Report 2018. The Swedish Pregnancy Register; 2019. Contract No. . Accessed 30 Oct 2019.
    1. Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Qvist N, Rasch V. Obstetric perineal ruptures -risk of anal incontinence among primiparous women 12 months postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;222;165.e1-11.
    1. Evans E, Falivene C, Briffa K, Thompson J, Henry A. What is the total impact of an obstetric anal sphincter injury? An Australian retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;31:557-66.
    1. Bjurwald L. BB-krisen: sveket vid livets början. Stockholm: Volante; 2019.
    1. Edqvist M, Lindgren H, Lundgren I. Midwives’ lived experience of a birth where the woman suffers an obstetric anal sphincter injury--a phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-258.
    1. Laine K, Pirhonen T, Rolland R, Pirhonen J. Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1053–1057. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.
    1. Clarke GM, Conti S, Wolters AT, Steventon A. Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2019;365:l2239.
    1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2000;321(7262):694–696. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
    1. Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries--myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113(2):195–200.
    1. Sioutis D, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):642–647. doi: 10.1002/uog.17306.
    1. Sultan AH, Fenner DE, Thakar R. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma [electronic resource] : diagnosis and clinical management. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited; 2007.
    1. Loke AY, Davies L, Li SF. Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0931-z.
    1. Betran AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet (London, England) 2018;392(10155):1358–1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
    1. WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects 1964 [updated October 2013]. Available from: . Accessed 30 Nov 2018.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다