Smoking and olfactory dysfunction: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was undertaken, examining the association between tobacco smoking and olfactory function in humans, utilizing PubMed and Web of Science (1970-2015) as data sources.

Study design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods: This database review of studies of smoking and olfaction, with a focus on identifying high-quality studies (based on modified versions of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), used validated olfactory tests among the generally healthy population.

Results: We identified 11 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Of 10 cross-sectional studies, two were excluded from meta-analysis because the cohorts they studied were included in another article in the review. In meta-analysis, current smokers had substantially higher odds of olfactory dysfunction compared to never smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-1.85). In contrast, former smokers were found to have no difference in risk of impaired olfaction compared to never smokers (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91-1.21). The single longitudinal study reviewed found a trend toward increased risk of olfactory decline over time in ever smokers; this trend was stronger in current as compared to former smokers.

Conclusions: Current smoking, but not former smoking, is associated with significantly increased risk of olfactory dysfunction, suggesting that the effects of smoking on olfaction may be reversible. Future studies that prospectively evaluate the impact of smoking cessation on improvement in olfactory function are warranted.

Level of evidence: N/A. Laryngoscope, 127:1753-1761, 2017.

Keywords: Smoking; cigarette smoke; olfaction; smell; tobacco smoke.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1.

Summary of literature review.

Figure 2.

Forest plot of meta-analysis of current smokers. ES = effect size, the odds ratio of olfactory dysfunction for current smokers vs. never smokers.

Figure 3.

Forest plot of meta-analysis of former smokers. ES = effect size, the odds ratio of olfactory dysfunction for former smokers vs. never smokers.