Predictors of outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic care: comparison of acute and chronic patients

Cynthia Peterson, Jennifer Bolton, B Kim Humphreys, Cynthia Peterson, Jennifer Bolton, B Kim Humphreys

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is a common complaint in patients presenting for chiropractic treatment. The few studies on predictors for improvement in patients while undergoing treatment identify duration of symptoms, neck stiffness and number of previous episodes as the strong predictor variables. The purpose of this study is to continue the research for predictors of a positive outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic treatment.

Methods: Acute (< 4 weeks) (n = 274) and chronic (> 3 months) (n = 255) neck pain patients with no chiropractic or manual therapy in the prior 3 months were included. Patients completed the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) and Bournemouth questionnaire (BQ) at baseline prior to treatment. At 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after start of treatment the NRS and BQ were completed along with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Demographic information was provided by the clinician. Improvement at each of the follow up points was categorized using the PGIC. Multivariate regression analyses were done to determine significant independent predictors of improvement.

Results: Baseline mean neck pain and total disability scores were significantly (p < 0.001and p < 0.008 respectively) higher in acute patients. Both groups reported significant improvement at all data collection time points, but was significantly larger for acute patients. The PGIC score at 1 week (OR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.13-9.92) and the baseline to 1 month BQ total change score (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.11) were identified as independent predictors of improvement at 3 months for acute patients. Chronic patients who reported improvement on the PGIC at 1 month were more likely to be improved at 3 months (OR = 6.04, 95% CI = 2.76-13.69). The presence of cervical radiculopathy or dizziness was not predictive of a negative outcome in these patients.

Conclusions: The most consistent predictor of clinically relevant improvement at both 1 and 3 months after the start of chiropractic treatment for both acute and chronic patients is if they report improvement early in the course of treatment. The co-existence of either radiculopathy or dizziness however do not imply poorer prognosis in these patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of available patient data and source of missing data at each collection time point.

References

    1. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:834–848. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4.
    1. Vernon H, Humphreys K, Hagino C. Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.014.
    1. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski GF, Yu F, Adams AH. A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1634–1641. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1634.
    1. Vernon HT, Humphreys BK, Hagino CA. A systematic review of conservative treatments for acute neck pain not due to whiplash. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:443–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.011.
    1. Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Brønfort G, Hoving JL. Manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Man Ther. 2010;15:315–333. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002.
    1. Hemmilä HM. Bone setting for prolonged neck pain: a randomized clinical trail. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:508–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.008.
    1. Rubinstein SM, Knol DL, Lebouef-Yde C, de Koekkoek TE, Pfeifle CE, van Tulder MW. Predictors of a favorable outcome in patients treated by chiropractors for neck pain. Spine. 2008;33:1451–1458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181753cc9.
    1. Thiel HW, Bolton JE. Predictors for immediate and global responses to chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:172–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.007.
    1. Martínez-Segura R, Fernández-de-las Peñas C, Ruiz-Sáez M, López-Jiménez C, Rodríguez-Blanco C. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:511–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.022.
    1. Evans R, Bronfort G, Nelson B, Goldsmith CH. Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation and two types of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine. 2002;27:2383–2389. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211010-00013.
    1. Thiel HW, Bolton JE, Docherty S, Portlock HC. Safety of chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. Spine. 2007;32:2375–2378. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557bb1.
    1. Rubinstein SM, Leboeuf-Yde C, Knol DL, de Koekkoek TE, Pfiefle CE, van Tulder MW. The benefits outweigh the risks for patients undergoing chiropractic care for neck pain: a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.04.013.
    1. Cassidy JD, Boyle E, Côté P, He Y, Hogg-Johnson S, Silver FL, Bondy SJ. Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case–control and case-crossover study. Spine. 2008;33:S176–183. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181644600.
    1. Tseng YL, Wang WTJ, Chen WY, Hou TJ, Chen TC, Lieu FK. Predictors for the immediate responders to cervical manipulation in patients with neck pain. Manual Therapy. 2006;11:306–315. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.08.009.
    1. Humphreys BK, Peterson CK, Muehlemann D, Haueter P. Are Swiss Chiropractors so Different? Results from the Swiss Job Analysis Survey 2009. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33:519–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.003.
    1. Soklic M, Peterson CK, Humphreys BK. Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for neck pain. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2012;20:2. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-2.
    1. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282:1157–1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157.
    1. Peterson CK, Bolton J, Humphreys BK. Predictors of improvement in acute and chronic low back pain patients undergoing chiropractic treatment. Accepted for publication J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012. April.
    1. Malmqvist S, LeBoeuf-Yde C, Ahola T, Andersson O, Ekström K, Pekkarinen H, Turpeinen M, Wedderkopp N. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: predicting outcome among chiropractic patients in Finland. Chiropr Osteopat. 2008;16:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-13.
    1. LeBoeuf-Yde C, Grønstvedt A, Borge JA, Lothe J, Magnesen E, Nilsson Ø, Røsok G, Stig LC, Larsen K. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: a 1-year prospective multicenter study of outcomes of persistent low-back pain in chiropractic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.01.010.
    1. LeBoeuf-Yde C, Grønstvedt A, Borge JA, Lothe J, Magnesen E, Nilsson Ø, Røsok G, Stig LC, Larsen K. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: demographic and clinical predictors for outcome in patients receiving chiropractic treatment for persistent low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:493–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.08.001.
    1. Lawrence DJ, Meeker W, Branson R, Bronfort G, Cates JR, Haas M, Haneline M, Micozzi M, Updyke W, Mootz R, Triano JJ, Hawk C. Chiropractic management of low back pain and low back-related leg complaints: A literature synthesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:659–674. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.10.007.
    1. Kongsted A, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program – individual patterns of low back pain established by means of text messaging: A longitudinal pilot study. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009;17:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-11.
    1. Kongsted A, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: Course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:2. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-18-2.
    1. Axén I, Rosenbaum A, Röbech R, Wren T, Leboeuf-Yde C. Can patient reactions to the first chiropractic treatment predict early favorable treatment outcome in persistent low back pain? J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:450–454. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.126473.
    1. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowske M, Delitto A. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:920–928.
    1. Axén I, Jones JJ, Rosenbaum A, Lövgren PW, Halasz L, Larsen K, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: Validation and improvement of a predictive model for treatment outcome in patients with low back pain receiving chiropractic treatment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:381–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.008.
    1. Mandel H, Semyonov M. A welfare state paradox: State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. Am J of Sociology. 2006;111:1910–1949. doi: 10.1086/499912.
    1. Hays RD, Kim S, Spritzer KL, Kaplan RM. et al.Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores. Value Health. 2009;12:1035–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00566.x.
    1. Hanmer J, Hays RD, Fryback DG. Mode of administration is important in US national estimates of health-related quality of life. Medical Care. 2007;45:1171–1179. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181354828.
    1. Power JR, Mishra G, Young AF. Differences in mail and telephone responses to self-rated health: use of multiple imputation in correcting for response bias. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29:149–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00065.x.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다