Real-World Evidence for Control of Chronic Migraine Patients Receiving CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Added to OnabotulinumtoxinA: A Retrospective Chart Review

Andrew M Blumenfeld, Benjamin M Frishberg, Jack D Schim, Ashley Iannone, Gary Schneider, Larisa Yedigarova, Aubrey Manack Adams, Andrew M Blumenfeld, Benjamin M Frishberg, Jack D Schim, Ashley Iannone, Gary Schneider, Larisa Yedigarova, Aubrey Manack Adams

Abstract

Introduction: Combination use of onabotulinumtoxinA and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has the potential to be more effective than either therapy alone for migraine prevention.

Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal chart review included adults with chronic migraine treated at one clinical site with ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA and ≥ 1 month of subsequent combination treatment with CGRP mAbs. Charts at time of mAb prescription (baseline) and up to four visits ~ 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-baseline were reviewed for safety, tolerability, and outcome measures (monthly headache days [MHDs], headache intensity, and migraine-related disability [MIDAS]).

Results: Of 300 charts reviewed, 257 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age: 50 years; 82% women). Average headache frequency was 21.5 MHDs before initiation of onabotulinumtoxinA and 12.1 MHDs before adding CGRP mAb therapy. Prescribed mAbs were erenumab (78%), fremanezumab (6%), and galcanezumab (16%). Over the entire study, patients discontinued CGRP mAb more frequently than onabotulinumtoxinA (23 vs. 3%). Adverse events occurred in 28% of patients, most commonly constipation (9%). Compared with onabotulinumtoxinA alone (baseline), MHDs decreased significantly at all visits (mean decrease: 3.5-4.0 MHDs over ~ 6-12 months of combination treatment); 45.1% of patients had clinically meaningful improvement in migraine-related disability (≥ 5-point reduction in MIDAS score) after ~ 6 months.

Conclusions: In this real-world study, combination treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA and CGRP mAbs was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified, and was associated with additional clinically meaningful benefits. More real-world and controlled trials should be considered to further assess safety and potential benefits of combination treatment. Video abstract: Real-world data suggests that CGRP inhibitors improve onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy for chronic migraine (MP4 20,067 kb).

Keywords: CGRP receptor; Chronic daily headache; Chronic headache; Combination therapy; Migraine headache; Preventive treatment; Type A botulinum toxins.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. aNot all patients had four visits or 12 months of data. bBaseline assessments for outcome measures (e.g., headache day frequency, headache intensity, disability) were collected from the visit at which the CGRP mAb was prescribed and reflect patient assessments during approximately 1–3 months prior to initiation of the CGRP mAb. cCGRP mAbs were self-administered by subcutaneous injection. Per label, erenumab and galcanezumab are administered once monthly, and fremanezumab is administered once every 3 months. dOnabotulinumtoxinA treatment is not always administered per label. CGRP calcitonin gene–related peptide, mAb monoclonal antibody, MIDAS Migraine Disability Assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Analysis cohorts for primary analysis and sensitivity analysis (AHS CGRP mAb cohort [31]). aOther reasons for exclusion included negative time from migraine diagnosis to index date; negative time from first onabotulinumtoxinA injection to index date; headache frequency of 45/30 days recorded at index; and data available for only one visit (visit 4). AHS American Headache Society, CGRP calcitonin gene–related peptide, CM chronic migraine, HIT-6 6-item Headache Impact Test, mAb monoclonal antibody, MIDAS Migraine Disability Assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in monthly headache frequency during combination therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA and a CGRP monoclonal antibody. a Mean change from baseline and b percentage of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in monthly headache frequency in the primary analysis cohort. c Mean change from baseline and d percentage of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in monthly headache frequency in the AHS CGRP mAb cohort. AHS American Headache Society, CGRP calcitonin gene–related peptide, CI confidence interval, mAb monoclonal antibody
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in migraine-associated disability during combination therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA and a CGRP monoclonal antibody. a Mean change from baseline in MIDAS score, b percentage of patients with a ≥ 5-point reduction in MIDAS score, and c percentage of patients with a ≥ 30% improvement from baseline in MIDAS score in the primary analysis cohort. d Mean change from baseline in MIDAS score, e percentage of patients with a ≥ 5-point reduction in MIDAS score, and f percentage of patients with a ≥ 30% improvement from baseline in MIDAS score in the AHS CGRP mAb cohort. AHS American Headache Society, CGRP calcitonin gene–related peptide, CI confidence interval, mAb monoclonal antibody, MIDAS migraine disability assessment

References

    1. IHS classification ICHD-3: migraine. 2019. . Accessed 18 Feb 2020.
    1. Lipton RB, Manack Adams A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. A comparison of the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study and American migraine prevalence and prevention (AMPP) study: demographics and headache-related disability. Headache. 2016;56:1280–1289. doi: 10.1111/head.12878.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, et al. Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) Cephalalgia. 2011;31:301–315. doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145.
    1. Buse DC, Manack Adams A A, Serrano D, Turkel C, Lipton RB. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:428–432. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492.
    1. Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, et al. Life with migraine: effects on relationships, career, and finances from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2019;59:1286–1299. doi: 10.1111/head.13613.
    1. Lanteri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S. Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:837–850. doi: 10.1177/0333102411398400.
    1. Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:793–803. doi: 10.1177/0333102410364676.
    1. Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:804–814. doi: 10.1177/0333102410364677.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Stark RJ, Freeman MC, Orejudos A, Manack AA. Long-term study of the efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of chronic migraine: COMPEL study. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:13. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0840-8.
    1. Rothrock JF, Manack Adams A, Lipton RB, et al. FORWARD study: evaluating the comparative effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine. Headache. 2019;59:1700–1713. doi: 10.1111/head.13653.
    1. Ahmed F, Gaul C, Garcia-Monco JC, Sommer K, Martelletti P. An open-label prospective study of the real-life use of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine: the REPOSE study. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:26. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0976-1.
    1. Burstein R, Blumenfeld AM, Silberstein SD, Manack Adams A, Brin MF. Mechanism of action of onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: a narrative review. Headache. 2020;60:1259–1272. doi: 10.1111/head.13849.
    1. Durham PL. CGRP-receptor antagonists—a fresh approach to migraine therapy? N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1073–1075. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048016.
    1. Joussain C, Le Coz O, Pichugin A, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin light chains expressed by defective herpes simplex virus type-1 vectors cleave SNARE proteins and inhibit CGRP release in rat sensory neurons. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11:123. doi: 10.3390/toxins11020123.
    1. Cernuda-Morollón E, Ramón C, Martínez-Camblor P, Serrano-Pertierra E, Larrosa D, Pascual J. OnabotulinumtoxinA decreases interictal CGRP plasma levels in patients with chronic migraine. Pain. 2015;156:820–824. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000119.
    1. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies—successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:338–350. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1.
    1. Aimovig [package insert]. Thousand Oaks, CA, and East Hanover, NJ: Amgen Inc., and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2020.
    1. Ajovy [package insert]. North Wales, PA: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; 2020.
    1. Emgality [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2019.
    1. Pellesi L, Do TP, Ashina H, Ashina M, Burstein R. Dual therapy with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and botulinum toxin for migraine prevention: is there a rationale? Headache. 2020;60:1056–1065. doi: 10.1111/head.13843.
    1. Melo-Carrillo A, Strassman AM, Nir RR, et al. Fremanezumab—A humanized monoclonal anti-CGRP antibody—inhibits thinly myelinated (Aδ) but not unmyelinated (C) meningeal nociceptors. J Neurosci. 2017;37:10587–10596. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2211-17.2017.
    1. Melo-Carrillo A, Strassman AM, Schain AJ, et al. Exploring the effects of extracranial injections of botulinum toxin type A on prolonged intracranial meningeal nociceptors responses to cortical spreading depression in female rats. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:1358–1365. doi: 10.1177/0333102419873675.
    1. Armanious M, Khalil N, Lu Y, Jimenez-Sanders R. Erenumab and onabotulinumtoxinA combination therapy for the prevention of intractable chronic migraine without aura: a retrospective analysis. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2020 doi: 10.1080/15360288.2020.1829249.
    1. Boudreau GP. Treatment of chronic migraine with erenumab alone or as an add on therapy: a real-world observational study. Anesth Pain Res. 2020;4:1–4. doi: 10.33425/2639-846X.1037.
    1. Cohen F, Armand C, Vollbracht S. Efficacy and tolerability of CGRP monoclonal antibody medications in patients with chronic migraine undergoing treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Headache Society; 2020 June 13, 2020.
    1. Gottschalk PC, Henn K, Robinson J, Schobel VR. Anti-CGRP class reduces migraine burden regardless of concomitant therapies in US clinical practice [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology; 2020.
    1. Suri H, Nandyala A, Dougherty C, Ailani J. Combination of erenumab and onabotulinum toxin A is a safe and effective treatment for chronic migraine [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Headache Society; 2020 June 13, 2020.
    1. Singh S, Singh H, Govindarajan R. Galcanezumab in the prevention of chronic migraine in patients on botulinum toxin therapy [abstract] Neurology. 2020;94(15 suppl):5257.
    1. Robblee J, Devick KL, Mendez N, Potter J, Slonaker J, Starling AJ. Real-world patient experience with erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Headache. 2020;60:2014–2025. doi: 10.1111/head.13951.
    1. Ozudogru SN, Bartell JW, Yuan H, Digre KB, Baggaley SK. The effect of adding calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies to onabotulinum toxin A therapy on headache burden: a retrospective observational case series. Headache. 2020;60:1442–1443. doi: 10.1111/head.13839.
    1. American Headache Society The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59:1–18.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56:S20–S28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20.
    1. Lipton RB, Desai P, Sapra S, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. How much change in headache-related disability is clinically meaningful? Estimating minimally important difference (MID) or change in MIDAS using data from the AMPP study [abstract PF52] Headache. 2017;57:165–166. doi: 10.1111/head.12997.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2123–2132. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848.
    1. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, et al. ARISE: a Phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1026–1037. doi: 10.1177/0333102418759786.
    1. Tepper S, Ashina M, Reuter U, et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:425–434. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30083-2.
    1. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91:e2211–e2221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640.
    1. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1080–1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212.
    1. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:365–391. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183717.
    1. Armanious M, Khalil N, Lu Y, Jimenez-Sanders R. A retrospective analysis to evaluate the response of the addition of erenumab to onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of intractable chronic migraine without aura [poster]. Annual Meeting of the American Headache Society; 2019 July 11–14, 2019; Philadelphia, PA.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, et al. Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1999–2008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853.
    1. Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, et al. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2113–2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709038.
    1. Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50:921–936. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x.
    1. Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, et al. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1030–1040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31946-4.
    1. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392:2280–2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0.
    1. Mulleners W, Kim B, Lainez M, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with treatment-resistant migraine: double-blind results from the CONQUER study [abstract] Neurology. 2020;94:162. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008834.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Paemeleire K, Broessner G, et al. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:817–826. doi: 10.1177/0333102419835459.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다