Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial
Frederik M Zimmermann, Angela Ferrara, Nils P Johnson, Lokien X van Nunen, Javier Escaned, Per Albertsson, Raimund Erbel, Victor Legrand, Hyeong-Cheol Gwon, Wouter S Remkes, Pieter R Stella, Pepijn van Schaardenburgh, G Jan Willem Bech, Bernard De Bruyne, Nico H J Pijls, Frederik M Zimmermann, Angela Ferrara, Nils P Johnson, Lokien X van Nunen, Javier Escaned, Per Albertsson, Raimund Erbel, Victor Legrand, Hyeong-Cheol Gwon, Wouter S Remkes, Pieter R Stella, Pepijn van Schaardenburgh, G Jan Willem Bech, Bernard De Bruyne, Nico H J Pijls
Abstract
Aims: Stenting an angiographically intermediate but functionally non-significant stenosis is controversial. Nevertheless, it has been questioned if deferral of a functionally non-significant lesion on the basis of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement, is safe, especially on the long term. Five-year follow-up of the DEFER trial showed that outcome after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an intermediate coronary stenosis based on FFR ≥ 0.75 is excellent and was not improved by stenting. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of this position on the very long term.
Methods and results: In 325 patients scheduled for PCI of an intermediate stenosis, FFR was measured just before the planned intervention. If FFR was ≥0.75, patients were randomly assigned to deferral (Defer group; n = 91) or performance (Perform group; n = 90) of PCI. If FFR was <0.75, PCI was performed as planned (Reference group; n = 144). Clinical follow-up was 15 years. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the randomized groups. Complete 15-year follow-up was obtained in 92% of patients. After 15 years of follow-up, the rate of death was not different between the three groups: 33.0% in the Defer group, 31.1% in the Perform group, and 36.1% in the Reference group (Defer vs. Perform, RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69-1.62, P = 0.79). The rate of myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the Defer group (2.2%) compared with the Perform group (10.0%), RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.99, P = 0.03.
Conclusion: Deferral of PCI of a functionally non-significant stenosis is associated with a favourable very long-term follow-up without signs of late 'catch-up' phenomenon.
Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Long-term follow-up; Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Source: PubMed