Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study

Lei Wang, Zi-Guo Lin, Qiao Ke, Jian-Ying Lou, Shu-Guo Zheng, Xin-Yu Bi, Jian-Ming Wang, Wei Guo, Fu-Yu Li, Jian Wang, Ya-Min Zheng, Jing-Dong Li, Shi Cheng, Wei-Ping Zhou, Yong-Yi Zeng, Lei Wang, Zi-Guo Lin, Qiao Ke, Jian-Ying Lou, Shu-Guo Zheng, Xin-Yu Bi, Jian-Ming Wang, Wei Guo, Fu-Yu Li, Jian Wang, Ya-Min Zheng, Jing-Dong Li, Shi Cheng, Wei-Ping Zhou, Yong-Yi Zeng

Abstract

Background and Aims: The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory, but the effect of postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (p-TACE) remains controversial. This multi-center retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical value of p-TACE and identify the selected patients who would benefit from p-TACE. Methods: Data of ICC patients who underwent radical resection with/without p-TACE therapy was obtained from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between Jan 2014 and Jan 2017. Overall survival (OS) was set as the primary endpoint, which was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the established staging system and survival risk stratification. Results: A total of 335 patients were enrolled in this study, including 39 patients in the p-TACE group and 296 patients in the non-TACE group. Median OS in the p-TACE group was longer than that in the non-TACE group (63.0 months vs. 18.0 months, P=0.041), which was confirmed after 1:1 PSM (P=0.009). According to the 8th TNM staging system, patients with stage II and stage III stage would be benefited from p-TACE (P=0.021). Subgroup analysis stratified by risk factors showed that p-TACE could only benefit patients with risk factors <2 (P=0.027). Conclusion: Patients with ICC should be recommended to receive p-TACE following radical resection, especially for those with stage II, stage III or risk factors <2. However, the conclusion deserved further validation.

Keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; overall survival; propensity score matching; transarterial chemoembolization.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

© The author(s).

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow chart of patients' enrollment
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (A) and recurrence-free survival (B) in whole cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (C) and recurrence-free survival (D) after propensity score matching
Fig 3
Fig 3
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival based on 8th AJCC staging system. (A), subgroup of patients with stage I, (B) subgroup of patients with stage II and stage III
Fig 4
Fig 4
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival based on risk factors. (A), subgroup of patients with “low risk”, (B) subgroup of patients with “high risk”.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I. et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–53.
    1. Rd BA, D'Angelica MI, Abbott DE. et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(5):563–73.
    1. Amini N, Ejaz A, Spolverato G. et al. Temporal trends in liver-directed therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:163–70.
    1. Weber SM, Jarnagin WR, Klimstra D. et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:384–91.
    1. Wang K, Zhang H, Xia Y. et al. Surgical options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017;6:79–90.
    1. Weber SM, Ribero D, O'Reilly EM. et al. Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB. 2015;17:669–80.
    1. Waisberg DR, Pinheiro RS, Nacif LS. et al. Resection for intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer: new advances. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:60.
    1. Shen F, Xie ZH, Xia Y. et al. Progress on surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019;57:241–6.
    1. Si A, Li J, Xiang H. et al. Actual over 10-year survival after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:44521–32.
    1. Zhang Y, Shi S, Yang H. et al. Systemic inflammation score predicts survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative resection. J Cancer. 2019;10:494–503.
    1. Konstantinidis IT, Groot KB, Do RK. et al. Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systemic plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is associated with longer survival in comparison with systemic chemotherapy alone. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 2016;122:758–65.
    1. Savic LJ, Chapiro J, Geschwind JH. Intra-arterial embolotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: update and future prospects. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017;6:7–21.
    1. Boehm LM, Jayakrishnan TT, Miura JT. et al. Comparative effectiveness of hepatic artery based therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:213–20.
    1. Jeong S, Zheng B, Wang J. et al. Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Favorable Postoperative Management to Improve Prognosis of Hepatitis B Virus-associated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Surgical Resection. Int J Biol Sci. 2017;13:1234–41.
    1. Lu Z, Liu S, Yi Y. et al. Serum gamma-glutamyl transferase levels affect the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who receive postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: A propensity score matching study. Int J Surg. 2017;37:24–8.
    1. Li J, Wang Q, Lei Z. et al. Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Following Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Survival Risk Stratification. Oncologist. 2015;20:640–7.
    1. Li T, Qin LX, Zhou J. et al. Staging, prognostic factors and adjuvant therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int. 2014;34:953–60.
    1. Shen WF, Zhong W, Liu Q. et al. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative surgery: retrospective control study. World J Surg. 2011;35:2083–91.
    1. Wu ZF, Zhang HB, Yang N. et al. Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation improves survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with poor prognostic factors: results of a large monocentric series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:602–10.
    1. Stuart EA, Lee BK, Leacy FP. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:S84–90.
    1. Si A, Li J, Xiang H. et al. Actual over 10-year survival after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:44521–32.
    1. Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y. et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1188–95.
    1. Sasaki K, Margonis GA, Andreatos N. et al. Preoperative Risk Score and Prediction of Long-Term Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:393–403.
    1. Zhou XD, Tang ZY, Fan J. et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of 272 patients compared with 5,829 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135:1073–80.
    1. Zhang XF, Chakedis J, Bagante F. et al. Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:857–66.
    1. Clark CJ, Wood-Wentz CM, Reid-Lombardo KM. et al. Lymphadenectomy in the staging and treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study using the National Cancer Institute SEER database. HPB (Oxford) 2011;13:612–20.
    1. Hu LS, Zhang XF, Weiss M. et al. Recurrence Patterns and Timing Courses Following Curative-Intent Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:2549–57.
    1. Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F. et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105:848–56.
    1. Wang L, Ke Q, Lin N. et al. Does postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization benefit for all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with microvascular invasion: a meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:528–37.
    1. Zhang XP, Liu YC, Chen ZH. et al. Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Improves Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Hepatic Vein Invasion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1465–73.
    1. Wang Z, Ren Z, Chen Y. et al. Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization for HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:2074–81.
    1. Hatano E, Uemoto S, Yamaue H. et al. Significance of hepatic resection and adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in the first branch of portal vein and the main portal trunk: a project study for hepatic surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018;25:395–402.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다