Living with Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC): Development of a Conceptual Model of MCC Based on Patient Experiences

Howard L Kaufman, Carla Dias Barbosa, Isabelle Guillemin, Jérémy Lambert, Lisa Mahnke, Murtuza Bharmal, Howard L Kaufman, Carla Dias Barbosa, Isabelle Guillemin, Jérémy Lambert, Lisa Mahnke, Murtuza Bharmal

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer with limited treatment options at advanced stages. There is a paucity of data available regarding the impact of MCC and its management on patients' lives. This study aimed to address this gap by interviewing patients with metastatic MCC entering a trial of an immunotherapy (avelumab).

Methods: In a single-arm, open-label, international, phase 2 trial in patients with stage IV, chemotherapy-refractory, histologically confirmed MCC, patients were invited to participate in semi-structured phone interviews. These were conducted before avelumab administration. Interview transcripts were analysed qualitatively to identify concepts important to patients relating to their experience of metastatic MCC and its management.

Results: Nineteen patients were interviewed. Most reported MCC to be painless and asymptomatic. They reported being often misdiagnosed and described a long process before receiving the correct diagnosis. They also reported a feeling of "shock" after being informed of the severity and seriousness of their cancer. Overall, patients did not report impaired physical and cognitive capacities or impact on daily lives, either before or after diagnosis. However, patients and their relatives reported feelings of "worry" and "fear" about the unknown outcome of the disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy negatively affected patients physically and psychologically in their everyday lives.

Conclusions: MCC disease was not perceived by the interviewed patients to result in severe functional limitations or to severely impact everyday activities, but was associated with substantial negative psychological impact. In contrast, chemotherapy and radiotherapy for MCC are highly debilitating and disrupt patients' lives. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov identifier: NCT02155647.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

This study was funded by and is part of an alliance between Merck KGaA and Pfizer, Inc, NY, USA.

Conflict of interest

MB is an employee of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. CDB and IG, employees of Mapi at the time the study was performed, and JL, an employee of Mapi, were paid consultants to Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. HK has served on advisory boards for Amgen, Celldex, Compass Therapeutics, EMD Serono, Merck, Prometheus, Sanofi and Turnstone Biologics. He has also served on a speakers’ bureau for Merck, but all honoraria were given to Rutgers University. LM is an employee of EMD Serono, Boston, USA. The authors did not receive payment for authorship.

Informed consent

All participants provided written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures, including patient interviews. The study was reviewed and approved by all local applicable institutional review boards and ethics committees.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of the journey of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and its management from before diagnosis to study entry. Red: concepts related to an impact; yellow: concepts related to symptoms/side effects; purple: concepts related to perceived treatment efficacy and expectations; light orange: concepts related to patients’ reaction at diagnosis; light green: concepts related to descriptive facts; light blue: concepts related to diagnostic issues

References

    1. Becker JC. Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii81–vii85.
    1. Oram CW, Bartus CL, Purcell SM. Merkel cell carcinoma: a review. Cutis. 2016;97(4):290–295.
    1. Spurgeon ME, Lambert PF. Merkel cell polyomavirus: a newly discovered human virus with oncogenic potential. Virology. 2013;435(1):118–130. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.029.
    1. Wong SQ, Waldeck K, Vergara IA, Schroder J, Madore J, Wilmott JS, et al. UV-associated mutations underlie the etiology of MCV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2015;75(24):5228–5234. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1877.
    1. Goon PK, Greenberg DC, Igali L, Levell NJ. Merkel cell carcinoma: rising incidence in the east of England. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016
    1. Zaar O, Gillstedt M, Lindelof B, Wennberg-Larko AM, Paoli J. Merkel cell carcinoma incidence is increasing in Sweden. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016
    1. Fitzgerald TL, Dennis S, Kachare SD, Vohra NA, Wong JH, Zervos EE. Dramatic increase in the incidence and mortality from Merkel cell carcinoma in the United States. Am Surgeon. 2015;81(8):802–806.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network website. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, Merkel cell carcinoma, version 1. 2017. . Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
    1. Soult MC, Feliberti EC, Silverberg ML, Perry RR. Merkel cell carcinoma: high recurrence rate despite aggressive treatment. J Surg Res. 2012;177(1):75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.067.
    1. Lebbe C, Becker JC, Grob JJ, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Pehamberger H, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(16):2396–2403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.131.
    1. Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, Bhatia S, Terheyden P, D’Angelo SP, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016
    1. Nghiem PT, Bhatia S, Lipson EJ, Kudchadkar RR, Miller NJ, Annamalai L, et al. PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in advanced Merkel-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(26):2542–2552. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603702.
    1. Grant A. Fear, confusion and participation: Incapacity Benefit claimants and (compulsory) Work Focused Interviews. Res Policy Plan. 2011;28(3):161–171.
    1. Sweet L. Telephone interviewing: is it compatible with interpretive phenomenological research? Contemp Nurse. 2002;12(1):58–63. doi: 10.5172/conu.12.1.58.
    1. Friese S. ATLAS.ti 7 user guide and reference. Berlin, Germany. 2014 . Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
    1. Lewins A, Silver C. Using software in qualitative research: a step-by-step guide. London: SAGE Publications; 2007.
    1. Boyatzis R. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. 2009. . Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
    1. Britten N. Qualitative research on health communication: what can it contribute? Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):384–388. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.021.
    1. O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J. What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open. 2013
    1. Walter FM, Birt L, Cavers D, Scott S, Emery J, Burrows N, et al. ‘This isn’t what mine looked like’: a qualitative study of symptom appraisal and help seeking in people recently diagnosed with melanoma. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005566.
    1. Iyer J, Blom A, Doumani R, Lewis C, Anderson A, Ma C et al., editors. Response rate and durability of chemotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma among 62 patients. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 50th annual meeting; 2014 30/05/2014 to 03/06/2014; Chicago, IL.
    1. Hao Y, Krohe M, Yaworsky A, Shields AL, Mazar I, Foley C, et al. Clinical trial patient-reported outcomes data: going beyond the label in oncology. Clin Ther. 2016;38(4):811–820. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.010.
    1. Luckett T, King MT, Butow PN, Oguchi M, Rankin N, Price MA, et al. Choosing between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G for measuring health-related quality of life in cancer clinical research: issues, evidence and recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(10):2179–2190. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq721.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다