A comparison of electronically-delivered and face to face cognitive behavioural therapies in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Candice Luo, Nitika Sanger, Nikhita Singhal, Kaitlin Pattrick, Ieta Shams, Hamnah Shahid, Peter Hoang, Joel Schmidt, Janice Lee, Sean Haber, Megan Puckering, Nicole Buchanan, Patsy Lee, Kim Ng, Sunny Sun, Sasha Kheyson, Douglas Cho-Yan Chung, Stephanie Sanger, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan, Candice Luo, Nitika Sanger, Nikhita Singhal, Kaitlin Pattrick, Ieta Shams, Hamnah Shahid, Peter Hoang, Joel Schmidt, Janice Lee, Sean Haber, Megan Puckering, Nicole Buchanan, Patsy Lee, Kim Ng, Sunny Sun, Sasha Kheyson, Douglas Cho-Yan Chung, Stephanie Sanger, Lehana Thabane, Zainab Samaan

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a widely used treatment for depression. However, limited resource availability poses several barriers to patients seeking access to care, including lengthy wait times and geographical limitations. This has prompted health care services to introduce electronically delivered CBT (eCBT) to facilitate access. Although previous reviews have compared the effects of eCBT to face-to-face CBT, there is an overall lack of adequately powered and up-to-date evidence in the literature to provide a reliable comparison between the two modes of administration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of eCBT compared to face-to-face CBT through a systematic review of the literature.

Methods: To be eligible for this review, studies needed to be randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of any form of eCBT compared to face-to-face CBT. These encompassed studies evaluating a wide range of outcomes including severity of symptoms, adverse outcomes, clinically relevant outcomes, global functionality, participant satisfaction, quality of life, and affordability. There were no restrictions on participant age or sex.We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psych Info, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL databases from inception to February 20th, 2020 using a comprehensive search strategy. All stages of literature screening and data extraction were completed independently in duplicate. Data extraction and risk of bias analyses, including GRADE ratings, were conducted on studies meeting inclusion criteria. Qualitative measures are reported in a narrative summary. We pooled quantitative data in meta-analyses to provide an estimated summary effect. This review adheres to PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Findings: In total, we included 17 studies in our analyses. Our results demonstrated that eCBT was more effective than face-to-face CBT at reducing depression symptom severity (Standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.72, -0.74; GRADE: moderate quality of evidence). There were no significant differences between the two interventions on participant satisfaction (SMD 0.13 95%; CI -0.32, 0.59; GRADE: low quality of evidence). One RCT reported eCBT to be less costly than face-to-face CBT (GRADE: low quality of evidence). Results did not differ when stratified by subgroups such as participant age and study location.

Interpretation: Although we found eCBT to have moderate evidence of effectiveness in reducing symptoms of depression, high heterogeneity among studies precludes definitive conclusions for all outcomes. With the current reliance and accessibility of technology to increasing number of people worldwide, serious consideration in utilizing technology should be given to maximize accessibility for depression treatments. Our results found eCBT is at least as effective as face to face CBT, thus eCBT should be offered if preferred by patients and therapists.

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Keywords: Behavior; CBT; Cognitive behavioural therapy; Depression; Electronic; MDD; Major depressive disorders; Systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

© 2020 The Authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flowchart of study screening and inclusion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of Bias within Studies. *other biases include self-report biases and niche study populations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for symptom severity (k = 14).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for global functionality (k = 2).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot for participants’ satisfaction (k = 3).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Risk of bias across studies.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Symptom severity funnel plot.

References

    1. Bureau UC . 2012. Computer and internet access in the United States. [cited 2019 Jan 15]; Available from:
    1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Internet] Am. Psy. Ass. 2013 [cited 2017 May 19]. Available from:
    1. World Health Organization. Depression [Internet]. 2018[cited 2018 Jul 10]. Available from:.
    1. Unmet mental health care needs costing Canadian economy billions [Internet]. [2016] [cited 2018 Apr 23]. Available from:.
    1. Krupnick J.L., Sotsky S.M., Simmens S., Moyer J., Elkin I., Watkins J. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: findings in the national institute of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(3):532–539. [Internet][cited 2018 Feb 12]Available from:
    1. Trivedi M.H., Rush A.J., Wisniewski S.R., Nierenberg A.A., Warden D., Ritz L. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(1):28–40. [Internet]Jan [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Cuijpers P., Sijbrandij M., Koole S.L., Andersson G., Beekman A.T., Reynolds C.F. Vol. 13. Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. Adding psychotherapy to antidepressant medication in depression and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis; pp. 56–67. [Internet]Feb [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Wiles N.J., Thomas L., Turner N., Garfield K., Kounali D., Campbell J. Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in primary care: follow-up of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):137–144. [Internet]. ElsevierFeb 1 [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Amick H.R., Gartlehner G., Gaynes B.N., Forneris C., Asher G.N., Morgan L.C. Comparative benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies in initial treatment of major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group. 2015;351 Dec 8 [cited 2018 Oct 12]h6019. Available from:
    1. Mor N., Haran D. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression (PDF download available) Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci [Internet] 2009;46(4):269–273. [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. James A.A., Soler A., Weatherall R.R. Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. In: James A.A., editor. Cochrane database of systematic reviews [Internet] John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2005. [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Hundt N.E., Barrera T.L., Robinson A., Cully J.A. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in veterans. Mil Med. 2014;179(9):942–949. [Internet]Sep [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Hofmann S.G., Asnaani A., Vonk I.J.J., Sawyer A.T., Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res [Internet] 2012;36(5):427–440. Oct 31 [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Perveen T., Mahmood S., Gosadi I., Mehraj J., Sheikh S.S. Long term effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy for treatment of postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis – JPMS. J Pioneer Med Sci. 2013;3(2):198–204. [Internet][cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Butler A., Chapman J., Forman E., Beck A. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(1):17–31. [Internet]Jan [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Siciliani L., Moran V., Borowitz M. Measuring and comparing health care waiting times in OECD countries. Health Policy (New York) 2014;118(3):292–303. [Internet]Dec [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Proudfoot J., Ryden C., Everitt B., Shapiro D.A., Goldberg D., Mann A. Clinical efficacy of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185:46–54. [Internet]Jul [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Cavanagh K., Shapiro D.A., Berg S., Swain S., Barkham M., Proudfoot J. The effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy in routine care. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006;45(4):499–514. [Internet]Nov [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Titov N. Status of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for adults. Aust New Zeal J Psychiatry. 2007;41(2):95–114. [Internet]Feb [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Clarke G., Eubanks D., Reid E., Kelleher C., O'Connor E., DeBar L.L. Overcoming depression on the internet (ODIN) (2): a randomized trial of a self-help depression skills program with reminders. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e16. [Internet]Jun 21 [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Ormrod J.A., Kennedy L., Scott J., Cavanagh K. Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in an adult mental health service: a pilot study of outcomes and alliance. Cogn Behav Ther. 2010;39(3):188–192. [Internet]Sep [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Kaltenthaler E., Parry G., Beverley C., Ferriter M. Computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(3):181–184. [Internet]. The Royal College of PsychiatristsSep 1 [cited 2018 Jan 13]Available from:
    1. Foroushani P.S., Schneider J., Assareh N. Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11(1):131. [Internet]. BioMed CentralDec 12 [cited 2018 Jan 13]Available from:
    1. Churchill R., Hunot V., Corney R., Knapp M., McGuire H., Tylee A. A systematic review of controlled trials of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of brief psychological treatments for depression. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(35):1–173. [Internet][cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group T.P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7) [Internet]. Public Library of ScienceJul 21 [cited 2017 Dec 16]Available from:
    1. Higgins J.P.T., Green S., Sally E., Cochrane Collaboration . Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; p. 649.
    1. WHO . WHO. World Health Organization; 2018. International classification of diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11) [Internet][cited 2019 Jan 15]; Available from:
    1. Greenland S., Robins J.M. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41(1):55–68. [Internet]Mar [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Borenstein M., Hedges L V., Higgins J.P.T., Rothstein H.R. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. [Internet][cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from:
    1. Review Manager (R) [Internet] 2014. Copenhagen: the cochrane collaboration. [cited 2017 May 19]. Available from:
    1. Lau J., Ioannidis J.P.A., Terrin N., Schmid C.H., Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ. 2006;333(7568):597–600. [Internet]. BMJ Publishing GroupSep 16 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group T.P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7) [Internet]. Public Library of ScienceJul 21 [cited 2017 Dec 16]Available from:
    1. Choi N.G., Marti C.N., Bruce M.L., Hegel M.T., Wilson N.L., Kunik M.E. Vol. 31. Wiley-Blackwell; 2014. Six-month post intervention depression and disability outcomes of in-home telehealth problem-solving therapy for depressed; pp. 653–661. (Low-income homebound older adults. Depress anxiety [Internet]). Aug [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Luxton D.D., Pruitt L.D., Wagner A., Smolenski D.J., Jenkins-Guarnieri M.A., Gahm G. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology home-based telebehavioral health for u.s. military personnel and veterans with depression: a randomized controlled trial home-based telebehavioral health for u.s. military personnel and veterans with depression: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 doi: 10.1037/ccp0000135. [Internet][cited 2018 Apr 24]; Available from:
    1. Sethi S. Treating youth depression and anxiety: a randomised controlled trial examining the efficacy of computerised versus face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy. Aust Psychol. 2013;48(4):249–257. [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111)Aug 1 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Andersson G., Hesser H., Veilord A., Svedling L., Andersson F., Sleman O. Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with 3-year follow-up of internet-delivered versus face-to-face group cognitive behavioural therapy for depression. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(3):986–994. [Internet]. ElsevierDec 1 [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Glueckauf R.L., Davis W.S., Willis F., Sharma D., Gustafson D.J., Hayes J. Telephone-based, cognitive-behavioral therapy for African American dementia caregivers with depression: initial findings. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(2):124–139. [Internet]May [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Himelhoch S., Medoff D., Maxfield J., Dihmes S., Dixon L., Robinson C. Telephone based cognitive behavioral therapy targeting major depression among urban dwelling, low income people living with HIV/AIDS: results of a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(8):2756–2764. [Internet]. Springer USOct 5 [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Kafali N., Cook B., Canino G., Alegria M. Cost-effectiveness of a randomized trial to treat depression among Latinos. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014;17(2):41–50. [Internet]Jun [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Kalapatapu R.K., Ho J., Cai X., Vinogradov S., Batki S.L., Mohr D.C. Cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients with co-occurring problematic alcohol use: effect of telephone-administered vs. face-to-face treatment—a secondary analysis. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46(2):85–92. [Internet]. RoutledgeMar 15 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Kay-Lambkin F.J., Baker A.L., Lewin T.J., Carr V.J. Computer-based psychological treatment for comorbid depression and problematic alcohol and/or cannabis use: a randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy. Addiction. 2009;104(3):378–388. [Internet]Mar [cited 2018 Jul 11]Available from:
    1. Littlewood E., Duarte A., Hewitt C., Knowles S., Palmer S., Walker S. A randomised controlled trial of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of depression in primary care: the randomised evaluation of the effectiveness and acceptability of computerised therapy (REEACT) trial. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(101) [Internet]. NIHR Journals LibraryDec [cited 2018 Apr 24]viii, xxi-171. Available from:
    1. Mohr D.C., Ho J., Duffecy J., Reifler D., Sokol L., Burns M.N. Effect of telephone-administered vs face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy on adherence to therapy and depression outcomes among primary care patients. JAMA. 2012;307(21):2278–2285. [Internet]Jun 6 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Nelson E.-.L., Barnard M., Cain S. Treating childhood depression over videoconferencing. Telemed J e-Health. 2003;9(1):49–55. [Internet]Mar [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Poppelaars M., Tak Y.R., Lichtwarck-Aschoff A., Engels R.C.M.E., Lobel A., Merry S.N. A randomized controlled trial comparing two cognitive-behavioral programs for adolescent girls with subclinical depression: a school-based program (Op Volle Kracht) and a computerized program (SPARX) Behav Res Ther. 2016;80:33–42. [Internet]. PergamonMay 1 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Sethi S., Campbell A.J., Ellis L.A. The use of computerized self-help packages to treat adolescent depression and anxiety. J Technol Hum Serv. 2010;28(3):144–160. [Internet]. Taylor & Francis GroupAug 31 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Stubbings D.R., Rees C.S., Roberts L.D., Kane R.T. Comparing in-person to videoconference-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mood and anxiety disorders: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e258. [Internet]. Journal of Medical Internet ResearchNov 19 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Wagner B., Horn A.B., Maercker A. Internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. J Affect Disord. 2014;152–154:113–121. [Internet]. ElsevierJan 1 [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Wright J.H., Wright A.S., Albano A.M., Basco M.R., Goldsmith L.J., Raffield T. Computer-assisted cognitive therapy for depression: maintaining efficacy while reducing therapist time. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(6):1158–1164. [Internet]Jun [cited 2018 Apr 24]Available from:
    1. Faraone S.V. Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care. MediMedia. 2008;33(12):700–711. P T [Internet] USADec [cited 2019 Jan 16]Available from:
    1. Kaltenthaler E., Sutcliffe P., Parry G., Beverley C., Rees A., Ferriter M. The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2008;38(11):1521. [Internet]Nov 21 [cited 2017 May 19]Available from:
    1. Foroushani P.S., Schneider J., Assareh N. Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11(1):131. [Internet]. BioMed CentralDec 12 [cited 2018 Jan 13]Available from:
    1. Karyotaki E., Riper H., Twisk J., Hoogendoorn A., Kleiboer A., Mira A. Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):351. [Internet]. American Medical AssociationApr 1 [cited 2018 Oct 19]Available from:
    1. Lau Y., Htun T.P., Wong S.N., Tam W.S.W., Klainin-Yobas P. Therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms among postpartum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e138. [Internet]. Journal of Medical Internet ResearchApr 28 [cited 2018 Oct 19]Available from:
    1. Wells M.J., Owen J.J., McCray L.W., Bishop L.B., Eells T.D., Brown G.K. Computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy for depression in primary care. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2018;20(2) [Internet]. Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.Mar 1 [cited 2018 Oct 19]0–0Available from:
    1. García-Lizana F., Muñoz-Mayorga I. Telemedicine for depression: a systematic review. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010;46(2):119–126. [Internet]Apr [cited 2018 Feb 12]Available from:
    1. Gellatly J., Bower P., Hennessy S., Richards D., Gilbody S., Lovell K. What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychol Med. 2007;37(9):1217–1228.
    1. de Bitencourt Machado D., Laskoski P.B., Severo C.T., Bassols A.M., Sfoggia A., Kowacs C. A psychodynamic perspective on a systematic review of online psychotherapy for adults. Br J Psychother. 2016;32(1):79–108.
    1. Thabrew H., Stasiak K., Hetrick S.E., Wong S., Huss J.H., Merry S.N. E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(8) [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, LtdAug 15 [cited 2018 Oct 19]Available from:
    1. Knaak S., Mantler E., Szeto A. Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare. Healthc Manage Forum. 2017;30(2):111–116.
    1. Thompson S.G. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ. 1994;309(6965):1351–1355. [Internet]. BMJ Publishing GroupNov 19 [cited 2018 Feb 12]Available from:
    1. Melsen W.G., Bootsma M.C.J., Rovers M.M., Bonten M.J.M. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(2):123–129. [Internet]. ElsevierFeb 1 [cited 2019 Jun 2]Available from:
    1. Schroll J.B., Moustgaard R., Gøtzsche P.C. Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):22. [Internet]. BioMed CentralDec 24 [cited 2019 Jun 2]Available from:
    1. Ekers D., Richards D., Gilbody S. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of behavioural treatment of depression. Psychol Med. 2007;38(5):611–623.
    1. Gloster A., Rinner M., Ioannou M., Villanueva J., Block V., Ferrari G. Treating treatment non-responders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled psychotherapy trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;75

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다