Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist

Panagiotis Katsinelos, Georgia Lazaraki, Grigoris Chatzimavroudis, Stergios Gkagkalis, Ioannis Vasiliadis, Apostolos Papaeuthimiou, Sotiris Terzoudis, Ioannis Pilpilidis, Christos Zavos, Jannis Kountouras, Panagiotis Katsinelos, Georgia Lazaraki, Grigoris Chatzimavroudis, Stergios Gkagkalis, Ioannis Vasiliadis, Apostolos Papaeuthimiou, Sotiris Terzoudis, Ioannis Pilpilidis, Christos Zavos, Jannis Kountouras

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is now the exclusive endoscopic therapeutic modality for biliary as well as pancreatic diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate patient- and procedure-related risk factors for post-ERCP complications in a large-scale study of procedures performed by a single experienced endoscopist.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study which included a total of 2,715 therapeutic ERCPs enrolled in the final analysis. Potential important patient- and procedure-related risk factors for overall post-ERCP complications, pancreatitis and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) bleeding were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Following the first therapeutic ERCP, 327 patients suffered complications; pancreatitis was observed in 132 (4.9%) patients, hemorrhage in 122 (4.5%) patients, cholangitis in 63 (2.3%) patients, perforation in 3 (0.11%) patients, and basket impaction in 7 (0.26%) patients. History of acute pancreatitis was more common in patients with post-ERCP complications (P<0.001). Female gender, young age (<40 years), periampullary diverticulum, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, metal stent placement, opacification of main pancreatic duct and suprapapillary fistulotomy were not found to be risk factors for overall post-ERCP complications and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Multivariate analysis showed a history of acute pancreatitis, difficult cannulation, needle-knife papillotomy, transpancreatic sphincterotomy, opacification of first and second class pancreatic ductules and acinarization as independent risk factors for overall complications and PEP, whereas antiplatelet and anticoagulation drug use were not found to be independent risk factors for post-ES bleeding.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that the endoscopist's experience reduces patient- and procedure-related risk factors for post-ERCP complications.

Keywords: Post-ERCP complications; post-ERCP pancreatitis; post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding; risk factors.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

References

    1. Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22:567–586.
    1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–918.
    1. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:417–423.
    1. Feurer ME, Adler DG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: review of current preventive strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:280–286.
    1. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652–656.
    1. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:31–40.
    1. Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy after cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:82–87.
    1. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.
    1. Katsinelos P, Beltsis A, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Endoscopic management of occluded biliary uncovered metal stents: a multicenter experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:98–104.
    1. Katsinelos P, Fasoulas K, Beltsis A, et al. Large-balloon dilation of the biliary orifice for the management of basket impaction: a case series of 6 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1298–1301.
    1. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2147–2153.
    1. Perini RF, Sadurski R, Cotton PB, Patel RS, Hawes RH, Cunningham JT. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of a microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:53–57.
    1. Cotton P, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romaqnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80–88.
    1. Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1414–1422.
    1. Katsinelos P, Fasoulas K, Paroutoglou G, et al. Combination of diclofenac plus somatostatin in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2012;44:53–59.
    1. Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Mukai T, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent reduces the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:851–859.
    1. Cha SW, Leung WD, Lehman GA, et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:209–216.
    1. Katsinelos P, Gatopoulou A, Gkagkalis S, et al. A prospective analysis of factors influencing fluoroscopy time during therapeutic ERCP. Ann Gastoenterol. 2012;25:338–344.
    1. Cooper ST, Slivka A. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2007;36:259–276.
    1. Jeurnink SM, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography: a prognostic model for early discharge. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2892–2900.
    1. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1781–1788.
    1. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclouqh P, et al. Risk factors for complications following ERCP: results of a large-scale prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007;39:793–801.
    1. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelosn DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:425–434.
    1. Testoni PA. Preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis: where are we? JOP. 2003;4:22–32.
    1. George S, Kulkarni AA, Stevens G, et al. Role of osmolality of contrast media in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:503–508.
    1. Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:3286–3292.
    1. DaVee T, Garcia JA, Baron TH. Precut sphincterotomy for selective biliary duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25:291–302.
    1. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zaqari RM, et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010;42:381–388.
    1. Cote GA, Kumar N, Ansstas M, et al. Risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis with placement of self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:748–754.
    1. Boustiere C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, et al. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guidelines. Endoscopy. 2011;43:445–461.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다