A proximal change experiment testing two communication exercises with intimate partner violent men

Abstract

This study tests the immediate impact of two interventions for intimate partner violent (IPV) men in affecting behavioral and emotional change during arguments with their partners. Couples with an abusive male partner (N=100) discussed an area of conflict twice, interrupted by a brief intervention. Men were randomly assigned to receive (a) an editing-out-the-negative skills training, (b) an accepting influence skills training, or (c) a time-out. IPV men in both skills-training conditions showed greater decreases in aggressive feelings than IPV men in the time-out condition based on their self-report and observed affective behavior. Women also reported feeling less aggressive when their husbands were assigned to one of the skills-training conditions as compared to the control (time-out) condition. Results suggest that IPV men can learn to adopt new communication skills and that they do appear to have a positive impact on the emotional tone of their arguments. Clinically, communication skills training may be a useful addition to battering intervention programs, although these skills may need to be taught to both men and women involved in violent relationships.

Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1

The Consort E-Flowchart.

FIGURE 2

Men’s self-reported aggressive affect over Time × Condition. Note. Points with different subscripts are significantly different, pairwise t-test p <.05.

FIGURE 3

Women’s self-reported aggressive affect over Time × Condition. Note. Points with different subscripts are significantly different, pairwise t-test p <.05.

FIGURE 4

Men’s observed verbal aggression over Time × Condition. Note. Points with different subscripts are significantly different, pairwise t-test p<.05.

FIGURE 5

Men’s observed positive affect over Time × Condition. Note. Points with different subscripts are significantly different, pairwise t-test p <.05.