Efficiency of a mathematical model in generating CAD/CAM-partial crowns with natural tooth morphology

Andreas Ender, Werner H Mörmann, Albert Mehl, Andreas Ender, Werner H Mörmann, Albert Mehl

Abstract

The "biogeneric tooth model" can be used for computer-aided design (CAD) of the occlusal surface of dental restorations. From digital 3D-data, it automatically retrieves a morphology matching the natural surface left after preparation. This study evaluates the potential of this method for generating well-matched and well-adjusted CAD/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated partial crowns. Twelve models with partial crown preparations were mounted into an articulator. Partial crowns were designed with the Cerec 3D CAD software based on the biogeneric tooth model (Biog.CAD) and, for control, with a conventional data-based Cerec 3D CAD software (Conv.CAD). The design time was measured, and the naturalness of the morphology was visually assessed. The restorations were milled, cemented on the models, and the vertical discrepancy and the time for final occlusal adjustment were measured. The Biog.CAD software offered a significantly higher naturalness (up to 225 to 11 scores) and was significantly faster by 251 (± 78) s in designing partial crowns (p < 0.01) compared to Conv.CAD software. Vertical discrepancy, 0.52 (± 0.28) mm for Conv.CAD and 0.46 (± 0.19)mm for Biog.CAD, and occlusal adjustment time, 118 (± 132)s for Conv.CAD and 102 (± 77)s for Biog.CAD, did not differ significantly. In conclusion, the biogeneric tooth model is able to generate occlusal morphology of partial crowns in a fully automated process with higher naturalness compared to conventional interactive CAD software.

References

    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jun;135(6):767-8, 770
    1. Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):285-99
    1. J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):450-3
    1. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1995;105(10):1284-90
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2007 Jan;10(1):109-17
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2005 Jan;8(1):47-58
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2006 Apr;9(2):129-36
    1. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Aug;113(4):333-40
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2004 Jul;7(3):229-38
    1. Dent Clin North Am. 1993 Jul;37(3):341-51
    1. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jun;35(6):446-53
    1. J Dent. 2002 Jan;30(1):53-8
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2001 Jan;4(1):25-36
    1. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Dec;94(6):561-6
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2003 Oct;6(4):333-42
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2006 Oct;9(4):333-8
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2007 Jan;10(1):69-75
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:22S-31S
    1. Gen Dent. 2005 May-Jun;53(3):195-8
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2000 Jul;3(3):197-205
    1. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995 Feb;53(1):24-8
    1. Dent Clin North Am. 1995 Apr;39(2):335-54
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2006 Apr;9(2):101-11
    1. Int J Comput Dent. 2005 Jan;8(1):13-25
    1. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:7S-13S

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다