Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up

Anna K Nilsdotter, Sören Toksvig-Larsen, Ewa M Roos, Anna K Nilsdotter, Sören Toksvig-Larsen, Ewa M Roos

Abstract

Background and purpose: With an aging population expecting an active life after retirement, patients' expectations of improvement after surgery are also increasing. We analyzed the relationship between preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction and self-reported outcomes with regard to pain and physical function after knee arthroplasty.

Patients and methods: 102 patients (39 men) with knee osteoarthritis and who were assigned for TKR (mean age 71 (51-86) years) were investigated with KOOS, SF-36, and additional questions concerning physical activity level, expectations, satisfaction, and relevance of the outcome to the patient. These investigations took place preoperatively and postoperatively after 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years of follow-up.

Results: Response rate at 5 years was 86%. In general, the patients' preoperative expectations were higher than their postoperative ability. For example, 41% expected to be able to perform activities such as golfing and dancing while only 14% were capable of these activities at 5 years. Having high or low preoperative expectations with regard to walking ability or leisure-time activities had no influence on the KOOS scores postoperatively. 93% of the patients were generally satisfied 5 years postoperatively, while 87% were satisfied with the relief of pain and 80% with their improvement in physical function at that time.

Interpretation: With an expanding population of mentally alert elderly, we can expect that great demands will be put on joint replacements. This study shows that patients have high preoperative expectations concerning reduction of pain. To a considerable extent, these expectations are fulfilled after one year. Expectations concerning demanding physical activities are not fulfilled to the same degree; however, most patients reported general satisfaction with the outcome indicating that satisfaction is not equivalent to fulfilled expectations. Preoperative counseling should include realistic information on outcomes concerning physical function and pain relief.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Breakdown of patients’ (n = 80) expectations preoperatively, the situation preoperatively, and outcome concerning walking ability. Crutches: the need for crutches or some other device to move more than a few steps; indoors: able to walk indoors; 1 km: able to walk more than 1 km; unlimited: unlimited walking on even ground; uneven terrain: unlimited walking on uneven terrain.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Breakdown of patients’ (n = 80) expectations preoperatively, the situation preoperatively, and outcome concerning leisure activities. No: no household work, only TV and reading; minimal: minimal household work, card games, and sewing; light: light yard work, light household work, shopping; heavy: heavy yard work, heavy household work; golf, dance: golf, dancing, hiking, water aerobics; recr sports: recreational sports.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percentages of patients (n = 80) with high expectations (much less or less pain; better or much better ADL, better or much better sport/recr) preoperatively and the percentages of patients reporting fulfilled expectations at 3 different follow-up times. ADL: activities of daily living; sport/recr: sport and recreational function; exp: expectations.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Percentage of patients who reported satisfaction (extremely satisfied, very satisfied) at the follow-ups 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years after TKR. The first (left-hand) block shows general satisfaction and the others show specific satisfaction in relation to the 5 KOOS subscales.

References

    1. Aarons H, Hall G, Hughes S, Salmon P. Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996;78(4):555–8.
    1. Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9(2):137–46.
    1. Barron CJ, Moffett JA, Potter M. Patient expectations of physiotherapy: definitions, concepts, and theories. Physeother Theory Pract. 2007;23(1):37–46.
    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95–108.
    1. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(6):740–7.
    1. Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis: time to shift the paradigm. This includes distinguishing between severe disease and common minor disability. BMJ. 1999;318(7194):1299–300.
    1. Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4):457–62.
    1. Haddad FS, Garbuz DS, Chambers GK, Jagpal TJ, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The expectations of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(1):87–91.
    1. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(7):1745–52.
    1. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, Finerman GA. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996;78(6):835–8.
    1. Lieberman JR, Thomas BJ, Finerman GA, Dorey F. Patients' reasons for undergoing total hip arthroplasty can change over time. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(1):63–8.
    1. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(6):1273–9.
    1. Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, E Charlson. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12(4):387–96.
    1. Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001;165(2):174–9.
    1. Nilsdotter AK, Aurell Y, Siosteen AK, Lohmander LS, Roos HP. Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(3):228–32.
    1. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement”. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 2009, doi: 10.1016/joca.2008.11.007.
    1. Ronnberg K, Lind B, Zoega B, Halldin K, Gellerstedt M, Brisby H. Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Spine. 2007;32(2):256–61.
    1. Roos EM, Toksvig-larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):17.
    1. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-–validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998;8(6):439–48.
    1. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index–additional dimensions for use in subjects with post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7(2):216–21.
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JR. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1349–58.
    1. Unlu E, Eksioglu E, Aydog E, Aydog ST, Atay G. The effect of exercise on hip muscle strength, gait speed and cadence in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21(8):706–11.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Medical Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
    1. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, Gordon MJ, Mathis KB. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop. 2002;(404):172–88.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다