An Adjustable Dalteparin Sodium Dose Regimen for the Prevention of Clotting in the Extracorporeal Circuit in Hemodialysis: A Clinical Trial of Safety and Efficacy (the PARROT Study)

Steven Soroka, Mohsen Agharazii, Sandra Donnelly, Louise Roy, Norman Muirhead, Serge Cournoyer, Martin MacKinnon, Neesh Pannu, Brendan Barrett, François Madore, Karthik Tennankore, Jo-Anne Wilson, Fiona Hilton, Nancy Sherman, Kevin Wolter, John Orazem, Guillaume Feugère, Steven Soroka, Mohsen Agharazii, Sandra Donnelly, Louise Roy, Norman Muirhead, Serge Cournoyer, Martin MacKinnon, Neesh Pannu, Brendan Barrett, François Madore, Karthik Tennankore, Jo-Anne Wilson, Fiona Hilton, Nancy Sherman, Kevin Wolter, John Orazem, Guillaume Feugère

Abstract

Background: Dalteparin sodium, a low-molecular-weight heparin, is indicated for prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during hemodialysis (HD). Product labeling recommends a fixed single-bolus dose of 5000 international units (IU) for HD sessions lasting up to 4 hours, but adjustable dosing may be beneficial in clinical practice.

Objective: The aim of the PARROT study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of an adjustable dose of dalteparin in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring 3 to 4 HD sessions per week.

Design: A 7-week, open-label, multicenter study with a single treatment arm, conducted between October 2013 and March 2016.

Setting: Ten sites in Canada.

Patients: A total of 152 patients with end-stage renal disease requiring 3 to 4 HD sessions per week.

Measurements: The primary outcome was the proportion of HD sessions completed without premature termination due to inadequate anticoagulation.

Methods: All participants initially received a dose of 5000 IU dalteparin, which could be adjusted at subsequent HD sessions when clinically indicated, by increment or decrement of 500 or 1000 IU, with no specified dose limits.

Results: Patients were followed for 256 patient-months. Nearly all (99.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.7-100) evaluable HD sessions were completed without premature clotting. Dose was adjusted for more than half (52.3%) of participants, mostly owing to clotting or access compression time >10 minutes. Median dalteparin dose was 5000 IU (range: 500-13 000 IU). There were no major bleeds, and minor bleeding was reported in 2.3% of all HD sessions. There was no evidence of bioaccumulation.

Limitations: This short-term study, with a single treatment arm, was designed to optimize dalteparin dose using a flexible dosing schedule; it was not designed to specifically evaluate dalteparin dose minimization, provide a direct comparison of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin, or provide information on long-term safety for flexible dalteparin dosing. Patients were excluded if they were at high risk of bleeding, including those on anticoagulants and those on antiplatelet agents other than aspirin <100 mg/d.

Conclusions: Overall, an adjustable dalteparin sodium dose regimen allowed safe completion of HD, with clinical benefits over fixed dosing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01879618, registered June 13, 2013.

Keywords: adjustable dose; clinical study; dalteparin sodium; end-stage renal disease; hemodialysis.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SS, MA, SD, LR, NM, SC, MM, NP, BB, FM, and KT have no relationship with Pfizer other than being a site investigator in the PARROT study. JW has received consultancy fees from Pfizer in the past 3 years. FH, NS, KW, JO, and GF are full-time employees of Pfizer Inc and hold stock and/or stock options.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of participants through the study. aOther: surgery or renal transplant (3 participants); initiated peritoneal dialysis (1); changed hemodialysis session schedule (1); moved dialysis clinic (1); withdrawn owing to surgery (1); travel abroad (1). bOne participant had baseline data only.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dalteparin sodium doses administered. Note. HD = hemodialysis; IU = international units.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Individual anti-Xa serum levels before HD at sessions 1, 10, and 20. Note. The bioaccumulation threshold for anti-Xa was 0.4 IU/mL and the lower limit of detection for anti-Xa was 0.04 IU/mL. HD = hemodialysis; IU = international units.

References

    1. Davenport A. Review article: low-molecular-weight heparin as an alternative anticoagulant to unfractionated heparin for routine outpatient haemodialysis treatments. Nephrology (Carlton). 2009;14:455-461.
    1. European Best Practice Guidelines Expert Group on Hemodialysis, European Renal Association. Section V. Chronic intermittent haemodialysis and prevention of clotting in the extracorporal system. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(suppl 7):63-71.
    1. Lim W, Cook DJ, Crowther MA. Safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparins for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:3192-3206.
    1. Palamaner Subash Shantha G, Kumar AA, Sethi M, Khanna RC, Pancholy SB. Efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin for chronic outpatient hemodialysis in end stage renal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ. 2015;3:e835.
    1. Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, Samama MM. Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e24S-e43S.
    1. Beijering RJR, ten Cate H, Stevens P, et al. Randomised long-term comparison of tinzaparin and dalteparin in haemodialysis. Clin Drug Invest. 2003;23:85-97.
    1. Schrader J, Kandt M, Zurcher C, Köstering H, Scheler F. Comparison of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin during long-term use in chronic haemodialysis and haemofiltration patients. Haemostasis. 1986;16: 48-58.
    1. Schrader J, Stibbe W, Armstrong V, et al. Comparison of low molecular weight heparin to standard heparin in hemodialysis/hemofiltration. Kidney Int. 1988;33:890-896.
    1. Ribic C, Gangji A, Pyrke R, et al. Intermittent HEMOdialysis anticoagulation with TINzaparin versus unfractionated heparin (HEMO-TIN): a multicentre randomized control trial. American Society of Nephrology. 2016; Abstract.
    1. Breckles J, Chow S. No evidence of bioaccumulation of dalteparin when used to anticoagulate the extracorporeal circuit in hemodialysis patients. CSN. 2017; Abstract.
    1. Kessler M, Moureau F, Nguyen P. Anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis: progress toward an optimal approach. Semin Dial. 2015;28:474-489.
    1. Pfizer Canada Inc. Fragmin Product Monograph (Canada). . Published 2017. Accessed December 4, 2017.
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. . Published 2008. Accessed June 29, 2017.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. . Published 1996. Accessed June 29, 2017.
    1. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. . Published 2008. Accessed July 17, 2017.
    1. Ljungberg B, Blombäck M, Johnsson H, Lins LE. A single dose of a low molecular weight heparin fragment for anticoagulation during hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol. 1987;27:31-35.
    1. Chen H, Nathoo B, Charest A. Converting from unfractionated heparin to dalteparin for extracorporeal circuit anticoagulation: impact on dialysis efficacy. CSN. 2016; Abstract.
    1. Lazrak HH, René E, Elftouh N, Leblanc M, Lafrance JP. Safety of low-molecular-weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin in hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:187.
    1. Douketis J, Cook D, Meade M, et al. Prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in critically ill patients with severe renal insufficiency with the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin: an assessment of safety and pharmacodynamics: the DIRECT study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1805-1812.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다