Randomized controlled trial of single-agent glimepiride and pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A comparative study

Nobuyuki Shihara, Masafumi Kitaoka, Nobuya Inagaki, Takashi Kadowaki, Seisuke Koumoto, Jo Satoh, Yasuo Terauchi, Kiyohide Nunoi, Yuichiro Yamada, Hiroyuki Sakamaki, Yutaka Seino, Nobuyuki Shihara, Masafumi Kitaoka, Nobuya Inagaki, Takashi Kadowaki, Seisuke Koumoto, Jo Satoh, Yasuo Terauchi, Kiyohide Nunoi, Yuichiro Yamada, Hiroyuki Sakamaki, Yutaka Seino

Abstract

Aims/Introduction: To compare first-line, single-agent glimepiride and pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled by diet and exercise with respect to glycemic control, safety and metabolic changes.

Materials and methods: Patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, non-blind, parallel-group trial of glimepiride (0.5-6 mg/day) or pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day) for 6 months.

Results: A total of 191 patients aged 30-75 years were randomized. Similar percentages of patients attained the primary end-point, with glycated hemoglobin < 6.9% at month 6 with glimepiride and pioglitazone, respectively (61.2 vs 56.8%, P = 0.64). At month 6, the following significant (P < 0.05) intragroup changes in mean plasma lipid concentrations were noted as compared with baseline: total cholesterol decreased from 203.5 to 195.5 mg/dL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol decreased from 124.5 to 116.3 mg/dL in the glimepiride group, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol increased from 51.6 to 56.0 mg/dL and triglycerides decreased from 167.6 to 143.6 mg/dL in the pioglitazone group. The only symptomatic adverse events were mild-to-moderate in four patients receiving pioglitazone, and constipation in one patient receiving glimepiride. Similar numbers of patients experienced asymptomatic hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) in the glimepiride and pioglitazone groups (n = 7 and 5, respectively).

Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between glimepiride and pioglitazone with respect to glycemic control, and both agents were well tolerated. Glimepiride significantly lowered total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, whereas pioglitazone increased HDL-cholesterol. This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan, UMIN000004582. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00115.x, 2011).

Keywords: Glimepiride; Pioglitazone; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). (a) Percentage of patients with HbA1c < 6.9% at 6 months. (b) Change in mean (±SD) HbA1c during the study. (c) Change in mean (±SD) HbA1c at month 6 vs baseline.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in mean (±SD) fasting (a) glucose, (b) insulin, (c) homeostasis model assessment for β‐cell function and (d) homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance at month 6 vs baseline.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in mean (±SD) fasting (a) total cholesterol, (b) high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, (c) low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and (d) triglycerides at month 6 vs baseline.

References

    1. National Institute of Health and Nutrition . Outline for the results of the National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan, 2007. Available at: [accessed on 2 August 2010].
    1. Kanatsuka A, Kawai K, Hirao K, et al. Research on antihyperglycemic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan (I): drug therapies and actual drug use. J Jpn Diabetes Soc 2006; 49: 409–415 (Japanese).
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10‐year follow‐up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1577–1589
    1. Toyota T, Satoh J, Fukao A, et al. Clinical evaluation of glimepiride (HOE490) in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus – a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study/phase III additional study. J Clin Ther Med 1997; 13: 157–158 (Japanese).
    1. Draeger KE, Wernicke‐Panten K, Lomp H‐J, et al. Long‐term treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with the new oral antidiabetic agent glimepiride (Amaryl): a double‐blind comparison with glibenclamide. Horm Metab Res 1996; 28: 419–425
    1. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJA, et al ; on behalf of the PROactive investigators . Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1279–1289
    1. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2457–2471
    1. Lincoff AM, Wolski K, Nicholls SJ, et al. Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2007; 298: 1180–1188
    1. Kawamori R, Kadowaki T, Onji M, et al. Hepatic safety profile and glycaemia control of pioglitazone in more than 20,000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: postmarketing surveillance study in Japan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 76: 229–235
    1. Loke YK, Singh S, Furnberg CD. Long‐term use of thiazolidinediones and fractures in type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis. CMAJ 2009; 180: 32–39
    1. Tan M, Johns D, González Gálvez G, et al ; on behalf of the GLAD Study Group . Effects of pioglitazone and glimepiride on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 680–693
    1. Langenfeld MR, Forst T, Hohberg C, et al. Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima‐media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a controlled randomized study. Circulation 2005; 111: 2525–2531
    1. Umpierrez G, Issa M, Vlajnic A. Glimepiride versus pioglitazone combination therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 751–759
    1. Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB, et al. Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima‐media thickness in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2572–2581
    1. Nissen SE, Nichols SJ, Wolski K, et al ; for the PERISCOPE Investigators . Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 299: 1561–1573
    1. Yamanouchi T, Sakai T, Igarashi K, et al. Comparison of metabolic effects of pioglitazone, metformin, and glimepiride over 1 year in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 980–985
    1. Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, et al. Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Invest 2010; 1: 212–228
    1. Araki T, Emoto M, Konishi T, et al. Glimepiride increases high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol via increasing adiponectin levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2009; 58: 143–148
    1. Xu D‐Y, Zhao S‐P, Huang Q‐X, et al. Effects of glimepiride on metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 88: 71–75
    1. Kaneko T, Baba S, Toyota T. Clinical evaluation of an insulin‐resistance improving agent, AD‐4833, in patients with non‐insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) on diet therapy alone. A placebo controlled double blind clinical study. Jpn J Clin Exp Med 1997; 74: 1515–1539 (Japanese).
    1. Shakuto S, Oshima K, Tsuchiya E. Glimepiride exhibits prophylactic effect on atherosclerosis in cholesterol‐fed rabbits. Atherosclerosis 2005; 182: 209–217
    1. Schaalan M, El‐Abhar HS, Barakat M, et al. Westernized‐like‐diet‐fed rats: effect on glucose homeostasis, lipid profile, and adipocyte hormones and their modulation by rosiglitazone and glimepiride. J Diabetes Complications 2009; 23: 199–208
    1. Scholz GH, Schneider K, Knirsch W, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of glimepiride in daily practice: a non‐interventional observational cohort study. Clin Drug Invest 2001; 21: 597–604

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다