Epidemiological trends for hospital admissions for acute rotavirus gastroenteritis in Belgium following the introduction of routine rotavirus vaccination and the subsequent switch from lyophilized to liquid formulation of Rotarix™

M Raes, D Strens, J Kleintjens, E Biundo, T Morel, A Vyse, M Raes, D Strens, J Kleintjens, E Biundo, T Morel, A Vyse

Abstract

This study describes epidemiological trends for acute rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in Belgium in children aged ⩽5 years during the period June 2007 to May 2014 after the introduction of routine rotavirus (RV) vaccination. This period encompassed the switch from lyophilized to the liquid formulation of Rotarix™ (GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) in August 2011. Uptake of RV vaccine remained consistently high throughout the study period with Rotarix the brand most often used. RV was present in 9% (1139/12 511) of hospitalized cases with acute gastroenteritis included in the study. Epidemiological trends for hospital admissions for RVGE remained consistent throughout the study period, with no evidence of any change associated with the switch from lyophilized to liquid formulation of Rotarix. This suggests both formulations perform similarly, with the liquid formulation not inferior regarding ability to reduce hospital admissions for acute RVGE in children aged ⩽5 years. A strong seasonal effect was observed with most RVGE occurring in the winter months but with some variability in intensity, with highest incidence found in those aged 6-24 months. The main observation was the decreased number of hospital admissions for RVGE in Belgium that occurred during winter 2013/2014.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01435967.

Keywords: Acute; Belgium; Rotarix™ vaccination; epidemiological; gastroenteritis; rotavirus; trend.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Number of positive tests and proportion (with 95% confidence intervals) testing positive for rotavirus stratified by age group (months).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Number of rotavirus laboratory tests performed and number of samples testing positive stratified by calendar month across the entire study period
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Number and proportion of samples testing positive for rotavirus by individual rotavirus season during the study period (with 95% confidence intervals). The dark and light grey bars reflect use of the lyophilized and liquid formulations of Rotarix, respectively. The white bar reflects the season in which the switch from lyophilized to the liquid formulation occurred.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Rotavirus vaccine uptake in Belgium (% of newborns vaccinated) over time stratified by vaccine brand (Intercontinental Marketing Services health sales data). * Denotes those years where data were not used for all the 12 months (reflecting the study period which began in September 2006 and concluded in May 2014).

References

    1. Ogilvie I, et al. Burden of community-acquired and nosocomial rotavirus gastroenteritis in the pediatric population of Western Europe: a scoping review. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012; 12: 62.
    1. Williams CJ, Lobanov A, Pebody RG. Estimated mortality and hospital admission due to rotavirus infection in the WHO European region. Epidemiology and Infection 2009; 137: 607–616.
    1. Parez N, et al. Rotavirus vaccination in Europe: drivers and barriers. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2014; 14: 416–425.
    1. Vesikari T, et al. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 oral suspension (liquid formulation) in Finnish infants. Vaccine 2011; 29: 2079–2084.
    1. Anh DD, et al. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of the human rotavirus vaccine RIX4414 (Rotarix™) oral suspension (liquid formulation) when co-administered with expanded program on immunization (EPI) vaccines in Vietnam and the Philippines in 2006–2007. Vaccine 2011; 29: 2029–2036.
    1. WHO. Immunization, vaccines and biologicals. Data, statistics and graphics. February 2016 ().
    1. Braeckman T, et al. Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in prevention of hospital admissions for rotavirus gastroenteritis among young children in Belgium: case-control study. British Medical Journal. Published online: 8 August 2012; doi:10.1136/bmj.e4752.
    1. Raes M, et al. Reduction in pediatric rotavirus-related hospitalizations after universal rotavirus vaccination in Belgium. Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal 2011; 30: e120–e125.
    1. WHO. Generic protocol for monitoring impact of rotavirus vaccination on gastroenteritis disease burden and viral strains, 2008. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.
    1. ECDC. Impact of rotavirus vaccination – generic study protocol, 2013. (). Accessed 1 September 2015.
    1. Atchinson CJ, et al. Clinical laboratory practices for the detection of rotavirus in England and Wales: Can surveillance based routine laboratory testing data be used to evaluate the impact of vaccination. Eurosurveillance 2009; 14: pii=19217.
    1. IMS sales data. (). Accessed February 2015.
    1. GeoHive. Belgium province population details (). Accessed October 2015.
    1. Braeckman T, et al. Rotavirus vaccination coverage and adherence to recommended age among infants in Flanders (Belgium) in 2012. Eurosurveillance 2014; 19: pii=20806.
    1. WHO. (). Accessed March 2016.
    1. Forster J, et al. Hospital-based surveillance to estimate the burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis among European children younger than 5 years of age. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e393–400.
    1. Hahné S, et al. Exceptionally low rotavirus incidence in the Netherlands in 2013/14 in the absence of rotavirus vaccination. Eurosurveillance 2014; 19: pii=20945.
    1. Atchison CJ, et al. Temperature-dependent transmission of rotavirus in Great Britain and The Netherlands. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2010; 277: 933–942.
    1. Giaquinto C, Van Damme P. Age distribution of paediatric rotavirus gastroenteritis cases in Europe: the REVEAL study. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2010; 42:142–147.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다