Axitinib versus placebo as an adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase III, randomized ATLAS trial
M Gross-Goupil, T G Kwon, M Eto, D Ye, H Miyake, S I Seo, S-S Byun, J L Lee, V Master, J Jin, R DeBenedetto, R Linke, M Casey, B Rosbrook, M Lechuga, O Valota, E Grande, D I Quinn, M Gross-Goupil, T G Kwon, M Eto, D Ye, H Miyake, S I Seo, S-S Byun, J L Lee, V Master, J Jin, R DeBenedetto, R Linke, M Casey, B Rosbrook, M Lechuga, O Valota, E Grande, D I Quinn
Abstract
Background: The ATLAS trial compared axitinib versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.
Patients and methods: In a phase III, randomized, double-blind trial, patients had >50% clear-cell RCC, had undergone nephrectomy, and had no evidence of macroscopic residual or metastatic disease [independent review committee (IRC) confirmed]. The intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients [≥pT2 and/or N+, any Fuhrman grade (FG), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0/1]. Patients (stratified by risk group/country) received (1 : 1) oral twice-daily axitinib 5 mg or placebo for ≤3 years, with a 1-year minimum unless recurrence, occurrence of second primary malignancy, significant toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) per IRC. A prespecified DFS analysis in the highest-risk subpopulation (pT3, FG ≥ 3 or pT4 and/or N+, any T, any FG) was conducted.
Results: A total of 724 patients (363 versus 361, axitinib versus placebo) were randomized from 8 May 2012, to 1 July 2016. The trial was stopped due to futility at a preplanned interim analysis at 203 DFS events. There was no significant difference in DFS per IRC [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.870; 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.660-1.147; P = 0.3211). In the highest-risk subpopulation, a 36% and 27% reduction in risk of a DFS event (HR; 95% CI) was observed per investigator (0.641; 0.468-0.879; P = 0.0051), and by IRC (0.735; 0.525-1.028; P = 0.0704), respectively. Overall survival data were not mature. Similar adverse events (AEs; 99% versus 92%) and serious AEs (19% versus 14%), but more grade 3/4 AEs (61% versus 30%) were reported for axitinib versus placebo.
Conclusions: ATLAS did not meet its primary end point; however, improvement in DFS per investigator was seen in the highest-risk subpopulation. No new safety signals were reported.
Trial registration number: NCT01599754.
Figures
References
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: kidney cancer. 2018. (19 June 2018, date last accessed).
- American Cancer Society. Survival rates for kidney cancer by stage. 2018. (23 April 2018, date last accessed).
- Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS.. Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am 2003; 30(4): 843–852.
- Lam JS, Shvarts O, Leppert JT. et al. Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system. J Urol 2005; 174(2): 466–472; discussion 472; quiz 801.
- Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387(10032): 2008–2016.
- Motzer RJ, Haas NB, Donskov F. et al. Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant pazopanib versus placebo after nephrectomy in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35(35): 3916–3923.
- Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pandha HS. et al. Adjuvant sunitinib in high-risk renal-cell carcinoma after nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 2016; 375(23): 2246–2254.
- Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P. et al. Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9807): 1931–1939.
- Hutson TE, Lesovoy V, Al-Shukri S. et al. Axitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(13): 1287–1294.
- Rini BI, Melichar B, Ueda T. et al. Axitinib with or without dose titration for first-line metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised double-blind phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(12): 1233–1242.
- Atkins MB, Plimack ER, Puzanov I. et al. Axitinib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, dose-finding, and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19(3): 405–415.
- Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K. et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307(12): 1265–1272.
- Janowitz T, Welsh SJ, Zaki K. et al. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma-past, present, and future. Semin Oncol 2013; 40(4): 482–491.
- Rini B, Goddard A, Knezevic D. et al. A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: development and validation studies. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16(6): 676–685.
- Brooks SA, Brannon AR, Parker JS. et al. ClearCode34: a prognostic risk predictor for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2014; 66(1): 77–84.
- Sternberg C, Donskov F, Haas NB. et al. Pazopanib exposure relationship with clinical efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24(13): 3005–3013.
- Suttle AB, Ball HA, Molimard M. et al. Relationships between pazopanib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2014; 111(10): 1909–1916.
- Houk BE, Bello CL, Poland B. et al. Relationship between exposure to sunitinib and efficacy and tolerability endpoints in patients with cancer: results of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010; 66(2): 357–371.
- Sheng X, Bi F, Ren X. et al. First-line axitinib versus sorafenib in Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: exploratory subgroup analyses of Phase III data. Future Oncol 2018. Jul 30 [epub ahead of print], doi:10.2217/fon-2018-0442.
- Tomita Y, Fukasawa S, Oya M. et al. Key predictive factors for efficacy of axitinib in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis in Japanese patients from a randomized, double-blind phase II study. Japanese J Clin Oncol 2016; 46(11): 1031–1041.
Source: PubMed