Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy

Luis Prieto, Hanne Thorsen, Kristian Juul, Luis Prieto, Hanne Thorsen, Kristian Juul

Abstract

Background: Quality of life of stoma patients is increasingly being addressed in clinical trials. However, the instruments used in the majority of these studies have not been validated specifically for stoma patients. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a quality-of-life instrument, "Stoma-QOL", specifically for patients with colostomy or ileostomy.

Methods: Potential items were formulated in English on the basis of the results of a series of semi-structured interviews with 169 adult stoma patients. The process resulted in a preliminary 37-item version, which was translated into French, German, Spanish and Danish, and administered repeatedly to 182 patients with colostomy or ileostomy. A psychometric selection of items was performed through Rasch Analysis. The measurement properties of the final questionnaire version were subsequently tested.

Results: The 20 items in the final questionnaire covered four domains--sleep, sexual activity, relations to family and close friends, and social relations to other than family and close friends. These items were found to define a unidimensional variable according to Rasch specifications (Infit MNSQ < 1.3). Internal consistency reliability calculated as Cronbach's alpha was 0.92, i.e., highly reliable. Spearman's correlation coefficients of scores across times of administration was > 0.88 (p < 0.01), indicating a high test-retest reliability. Item calibrations by country calculated as ICC were 0.81 (0.67-0.91 95% CI), confirming cross-cultural comparability across the European countries included in the study.

Conclusion: Given the adequacy of the metric properties of the Stoma-QOL suggested by the psychometric analyses, this study confirms the suitability of the instrument in clinical practice and in clinical research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of the Stoma-QOL questionnaire.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stoma-QOL Item Calibration of the items located within the spread of the person measures. (logit scores, the measurement unit common to both patients and items, are displayed down the middle of the map; patient, represented by a single dot, are arranged within the scale from better (top) to worse (down) quality of life; items are identified by the item number)

References

    1. Olbrisch ME. Development and validation of the ostomy adjustment scale. Rehabil Psychol. 1983;28:3–12.
    1. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1569–1574.
    1. Karadag A, Mentes BB, Uner A, Irkorucu O, Ayaz S, Ozkan S. Impact of stomatherapy on quality of life in patients with permanent colostomies or ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:234–238.
    1. Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI. Quality of life of stoma patients: temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg. 2003;27:421–424. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6699-4.
    1. Scarpa M, Barollo M, Polese L, Keighley MR. Quality of life in patients with an ileostomy. Minerva Chir. 2004;59:23–29.
    1. Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B. Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Montreux Study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49:48–55.
    1. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3. New York, McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    1. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1986.
    1. Hunt SM, McKenna SP : The QLDS: a scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy. 1992;22:307–319. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(92)90004-U.
    1. Maslow A. Motivation and Personality. 2. New York Harper & Row; 1970.
    1. Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R, Wright BD. Rasch measurement for reducing the items of the Nottingham Health Profile. J Outcome Meas. 1998;2:285–301.
    1. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Mahwah, New Jersey; 2001. pp. 7–34.
    1. Swaine-Verdier A, Doward LC, Hagell P, Thorsen H, McKenna SP. Adapting quality of life instruments. Value Health. 2004;7:S27–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s107.x.
    1. Wright BD, Linacre JM. User's Guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch-Model Computer Program. Chicago, MESA Press; 1999.
    1. Smith RM, Schumacker RE, Bush MJ. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. J Outcome Measurement. 1998;2:66–78.
    1. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142S–158S.
    1. Lindeboom R, Sprangers MA, Zwinderman AH. Responsiveness: a reinvention of the wheel? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-8.
    1. Hays RD, Hadorn D. Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Qual Life Res. 1992;1:73–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00435438.
    1. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:349–62. doi: 10.1023/A:1023499322593.
    1. Puhan MA, Bryant D, Guyatt GH, Heels-Ansdell D, Schunemann HJ. Internal consistency reliability is a poor predictor of responsiveness. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:33. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-33.
    1. Guassora AD, Kruuse C, Thomsen OO, Binder V. Quality of life study in a regional group of patients with Crohn disease. A structured interview study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:1068–1074. doi: 10.1080/003655200451199.
    1. Casellas F, Lopez-Vivancos J, Badia X, Vilaseca J, Malagelada JR. Impact of surgery for Crohn's disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:177–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01681.x.
    1. Guyatt G, Feeny D, Patrick D. Issues in quality-of-life measurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:81S–90S.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다