Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial

Byeong-Keuk Kim, Sung-Jin Hong, Yun-Hyeong Cho, Kyeong Ho Yun, Yong Hoon Kim, Yongsung Suh, Jae Young Cho, Ae-Young Her, Sungsoo Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Sang-Yong Yoo, Deok-Kyu Cho, Bum-Kee Hong, Hyuckmoon Kwon, Chul-Min Ahn, Dong-Ho Shin, Chung-Mo Nam, Jung-Sun Kim, Young-Guk Ko, Donghoon Choi, Myeong-Ki Hong, Yangsoo Jang, TICO Investigators, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Sung-Jin Hong, Yun-Hyeong Cho, Kyeong Ho Yun, Yong Hoon Kim, Yongsung Suh, Jae Young Cho, Ae-Young Her, Sungsoo Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Sang-Yong Yoo, Deok-Kyu Cho, Bum-Kee Hong, Hyuckmoon Kwon, Chul-Min Ahn, Dong-Ho Shin, Chung-Mo Nam, Jung-Sun Kim, Young-Guk Ko, Donghoon Choi, Myeong-Ki Hong, Yangsoo Jang, TICO Investigators

Abstract

Importance: Discontinuing aspirin after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was evaluated as a bleeding reduction strategy. However, the strategy of ticagrelor monotherapy has not been exclusively evaluated in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Objective: To determine whether switching to ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT reduces net adverse clinical events compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT in patients with ACS treated with drug-eluting stents.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized multicenter trial was conducted in 3056 patients with ACS treated with drug-eluting stents between August 2015 and October 2018 at 38 centers in South Korea. Follow-up was completed in October 2019.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice daily) after 3-month DAPT (n = 1527) or ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (n = 1529).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a 1-year net adverse clinical event, defined as a composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization). Prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

Results: Among 3056 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61 years; 628 women [20%]; 36% ST-elevation myocardial infarction), 2978 patients (97.4%) completed the trial. The primary outcome occurred in 59 patients (3.9%) receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT and in 89 patients (5.9%) receiving ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (absolute difference, -1.98% [95% CI, -3.50% to -0.45%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92]; P = .01). Of 10 prespecified secondary outcomes, 8 showed no significant difference. Major bleeding occurred in 1.7% of patients with ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT and in 3.0% of patients with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.91]; P = .02). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was not significantly different between the ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT group (2.3%) vs the ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group (3.4%) (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.06]; P = .09).

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with drug-eluting stents, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy, resulted in a modest but statistically significant reduction in a composite outcome of major bleeding and cardiovascular events at 1 year. The study population and lower than expected event rates should be considered in interpreting the trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494895.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Participant Flow in the TICO…
Figure 1.. Participant Flow in the TICO Randomized Clinical Trial
aStudy sites were not required to provide screening logs. Data regarding reasons for ineligibility are not available. bOutcomes of patients who were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent were included to the point of final contact. Their time-to-event measure was censored at the last contact date.
Figure 2.. Time-to-Event Curves for the Primary…
Figure 2.. Time-to-Event Curves for the Primary Outcome and Landmark Analysis at 3 Months
A net adverse clinical event was defined as a composite of major bleeding by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event. Between 3 and 12 months, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25-0.68; P = .001). Reported HRs are for the patients with ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The median observation periods were 365 days (interquartile range, 365-365) for both study groups.
Figure 3.. Subgroup Analyses for the Primary…
Figure 3.. Subgroup Analyses for the Primary Outcome
Numbers and percentages shown are number of patients with event/number of patients at risk and incidences at 1 year. NSTEMI indicates non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction. aP values for interaction were calculated using interaction terms in a Cox proportional hazard model. bChronic kidney disease was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. cCalculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

References

    1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, et al. . 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(10):1082-1115. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.513
    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies . 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(3):213-260. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419
    1. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. ; TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators . Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001-2015. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706482
    1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. ; PLATO Investigators . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045-1057. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0904327
    1. Park DW, Kwon O, Jang JS, et al. ; TICAKOREA Investigators . Clinically significant bleeding with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for invasive management: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140(23):1865-1877. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041766
    1. Antman EM, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. . Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(21):2028-2033. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.002
    1. Becker RC, Bassand JP, Budaj A, et al. . Bleeding complications with the P2Y12 receptor antagonists clopidogrel and ticagrelor in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2933-2944. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr422
    1. Capodanno D, Mehran R, Valgimigli M, et al. . Aspirin-free strategies in cardiovascular disease and cardioembolic stroke prevention. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(8):480-496. doi:10.1038/s41569-018-0049-1
    1. Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Jüni P, et al. ; GLOBAL LEADERS Investigators . Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10151):940-949. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0
    1. Mehran R, Baber U, Sharma SK, et al. . Ticagrelor with or without aspirin in high-risk patients after PCI. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(21):2032-2042. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1908419
    1. Kim C, Hong SJ, Shin DH, et al. . Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2019;212:45-52. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015
    1. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. . Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736-2747. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. ; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction . Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126(16):2020-2035. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
    1. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. ; Academic Research Consortium . Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2344-2351. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism . An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064-2089. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca
    1. Kim BK, Hong MK, Shin DH, et al. ; RESET Investigators . A new strategy for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy: the RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1340-1348. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.043
    1. Kaul S, Diamond GA. Making sense of noninferiority: a clinical and statistical perspective on its application to cardiovascular clinical trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2007;49(4):284-299. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2006.10.001
    1. Palmerini T, Benedetto U, Bacchi-Reggiani L, et al. . Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2371-2382. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60263-X
    1. Feres F, Costa RA, Abizaid A, et al. ; OPTIMIZE Trial Investigators . Three vs twelve months of dual antiplatelet therapy after zotarolimus-eluting stents: the OPTIMIZE randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2510-2522. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282183
    1. Hong SJ, Shin DH, Kim JS, et al. ; IVUS-XPL Investigators . 6-Month versus 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy following long everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(14):1438-1446. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.036
    1. Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH, et al. ; SMART-DATE Investigators . 6-Month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1274-1284. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30493-8
    1. De Luca G, Damen SA, Camaro C, et al. ; Collaborators . Final results of the randomised evaluation of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with a new-generation stent (REDUCE trial). EuroIntervention. 2019;15(11):e990-e998. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00539
    1. Kedhi E, Fabris E, van der Ent M, et al. . Six months versus 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DAPT-STEMI): randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018;363:k3793. doi:10.1136/bmj.k3793
    1. Watanabe H, Domei T, Morimoto T, et al. ; STOPDAPT-2 Investigators . Effect of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients receiving PCI: the STOPDAPT-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(24):2414-2427. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.8145
    1. Hahn JY, Song YB, Oh JH, et al. ; SMART-CHOICE Investigators . Effect of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs dual antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SMART-CHOICE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321(24):2428-2437. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.8146
    1. Lee SY, Hong MK, Shin DH, et al. . Association between duration of dual antiplatelet therapy and angiographic multivessel disease on outcomes in patients treated with newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(11):e004256. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004256
    1. Kandzari DE, Mauri L, Koolen JJ, et al. ; BIOFLOW V Investigators . Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1843-1852. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32249-3
    1. Iglesias JF, Muller O, Heg D, et al. . Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1243-1253. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다