Semaglutide s.c. Once-Weekly in Type 2 Diabetes: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Kristin Cecilie Carlsson Petri, Steen Hvass Ingwersen, Anne Flint, Jeppe Zacho, Rune Viig Overgaard, Kristin Cecilie Carlsson Petri, Steen Hvass Ingwersen, Anne Flint, Jeppe Zacho, Rune Viig Overgaard

Abstract

Introduction: Semaglutide, a new treatment option approved for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist to be injected subcutaneously once weekly. This analysis used a population pharmacokinetic model of semaglutide to identify clinically relevant covariates for exposure.

Methods: A total of 1612 patients with up to seven pharmacokinetic observations each were included in the analysis. All subjects had type 2 diabetes mellitus and were enrolled in one of five trials in the phase III development program for subcutaneous semaglutide once weekly (the SUSTAIN program). The treatment duration of the trials varied from 30 to 104 weeks.

Results: No clinically relevant effects on the exposure were seen for sex, age, race, ethnicity, renal function, or injection site used, and semaglutide exposure was stable over time. Of the covariates chosen, only body weight had a relevant effect on the exposure of semaglutide. Few subjects developed semaglutide antibodies, and the antibodies had no effect on exposure. Dose proportionality was shown for the 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg maintenance doses of semaglutide.

Conclusion: The population pharmacokinetic study showed that semaglutide exposure is not affected by covariates other than body weight at either a maintenance dose of 0.5 or 1.0 mg semaglutide. Therefore, we conclude that no semaglutide dose adjustments are needed in different populations. This finding is to be further explored in an exposure-response analysis.

Trial registration: The trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifiers: NCT02054897, NCT01930188, NCT01885208, NCT01720446 and NCT02207374).

Funding: Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark.

Keywords: GLP-1 analog; GLP-1 receptor agonist; Population pharmacokinetics; Semaglutide.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of exposure values from trials included in the population PK analysis. a Exposure for subjects treated with 0.5 mg semaglutide; b exposure for subjects treated with 1.0 mg semaglutide. PK pharmacokinetic, SUSTAIN Semaglutide Unabated Sustainability in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of covariate analysis for semaglutide exposure expressed as steady-state dose-normalized average semaglutide concentrations relative to a reference subject. The reference subject profile was non-Hispanic or Latino, white, female, below 65 years, with a body weight of 85 kg, with normal renal function, and who was dosed in the abdomen with semaglutide 1 mg. The column to the right shows means and 90% CI for the relative exposures. Two additional race groups (American Indian or Alaska native, n = 3 subjects, and unknown, n = 41) were included in the analysis without a separate race covariate, i.e., modeled as the reference race group (white) in the covariate analysis. Subjects without information on race were from France (n = 20), Mexico (n = 13), Canada and the USA (n = 2 each), Australia, Norway, South Africa, and the UK (n = 1 each). Body weight test categories (55 and 127 kg) represent the 5% and 95% percentiles, respectively, in the data set. Vertical dotted lines indicate the acceptance interval for bioequivalence (0.80; 1.25). Cavg average semaglutide concentrations at steady state; CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Simulated concentration profiles for semaglutide 0.5 mg (a) or 1.0 mg (b) at steady state over 3 weeks, with variability. The shaded area illustrates the simulated 95% concentration range predicted from the between-subject variability in the full population PK model (N = 1000 replications in each group). BW body weight
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Semaglutide exposure versus body weight. Data are dose-normalized individual average semaglutide concentrations (Cavg) versus baseline body weight (small rectangles) and mean exposure estimates versus body weight presented in 10 quantiles by sex (a) or by ethnicity (b)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Simulated semaglutide concentration profiles following missed or delayed doses. Data are simulated concentrations during once-weekly dosing at steady-state concentrations with one missed dose at week 11 (a) and for a dose with a delay of 5 days at week 11 (b) compared with a steady-state profile for semaglutide dosed at weekly intervals. Simulations are for a reference subject profile (non-Hispanic or Latino, white female < 65 years, with a body weight of 85 kg, with normal renal function, and dosed in the abdomen with semaglutide 1.0 mg)

References

    1. Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513–30.
    1. International Diabetes Federation . IDF diabetes atlas. 7. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
    1. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1674–1685. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0666.
    1. Laakso M. Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes from population to man to mechanisms: the Kelly West Award Lecture 2008. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:442–449. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0749.
    1. Noto H, Tsujimoto T, Sasazuki T, Noda M. Significantly increased risk of cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EndocrPract. 2011;17:616–628.
    1. Barone BB, Yeh HC, Snyder CF, Peairs KS, Stein KB, Derr RL, et al. Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2754–2764. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.824.
    1. Wexler D, Grant R, Wittenberg E, Bosch J, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1489–1497. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0249-9.
    1. Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T, Deacon CF. The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;297:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.012.
    1. Kieffer TJ, Habener JF. The glucagon-like peptides. Endocr Rev. 1999;20:876–913. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.6.0385.
    1. Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 promotes satiety and suppresses energy intake in humans. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:515–520. doi: 10.1172/JCI990.
    1. Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists for individualized treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:728–742. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.140.
    1. Lau J, Bloch P, Schäffer L, Pettersson I, Spetzler J, Kofoed J, et al. Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide. J Med Chem. 2015;58:7370–7380. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00726.
    1. Sorli CHS, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, Unger J, Karsbol JD, Hansen T, Bain SC. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:251–260. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X.
    1. Ahrén B, Comas LM, Kumar H, Sargin M, Derving Karsbøl J, Jacobsen SH, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:341–354. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30092-X.
    1. Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:258–266. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0417.
    1. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, Piletic M, Rose L, Axelsen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:355–366. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2.
    1. Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, et al. Semaglutide added to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:2291–2301. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00070.
    1. Seino Y, Terauchi Y, Osonoi T, Yabe D, Abe N, Nishida T, et al. Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly versus sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:378–388. doi: 10.1111/dom.13082.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.
    1. Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, Abido A, Nishida T, Zacho J, Kiyosue A. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1202–1212. doi: 10.1111/dom.13218.
    1. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Last amended by the 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil. 2013. . Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
    1. International Conference of Harmonisation. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. 1996. . Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
    1. Nauck MA, Petrie JR, Sesti G, Mannucci E, Courrèges JP, Lindegaard ML, et al. A phase 2, randomized, dose-finding study of the novel once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, semaglutide, compared with placebo and open-label liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:231–241. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2479.
    1. Kapitza C, Nosek L, Jensen L, Hartvig H, Jensen CB, Flint A. Semaglutide, a once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, does not reduce the bioavailability of the combined oral contraceptive, ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55:497–504. doi: 10.1002/jcph.443.
    1. Hu C, Zhang J, Zhou H. Confirmatory analysis for phase III population pharmacokinetics. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:14–26. doi: 10.1002/pst.403.
    1. Marshall SF, Marshall S, Burghaus R, Cosson V, Cheung SY, Chenel M, et al. Good practices in model-informed drug discovery and development: practice, application, and documentation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5:93–122. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12049.
    1. Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Lane J, Wang P. Relationship between obesity and diabetes in a US adult population: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006. Obes Surg. 2011;21:351–355. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0335-4.
    1. Gatineau M, Hancock C, Holman N, Outhwaite H, Oldridge L, Christie A, et al. Adult obesity and type 2 diabetes. In: England PH, editor. London: Public Health England; 2014.
    1. Lindbom L, Pihlgren P, Jonsson EN. PsN-Toolkit—a collection of computer intensive statistical methods for non-linear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005;79:241–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.04.005.
    1. Lindbom L, Ribbing J, Jonsson EN. Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN)—a Perl module for NONMEM related programming. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2004;75:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.11.003.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Population Pharmacokinetics. 1999. . Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
    1. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses (CHMP/EWP/185990/06). 21 June 2007. . Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
    1. Overgaard RV, Petri KC, Jacobsen LV, Jensen CB. Liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1413–1422. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0410-7.
    1. Jacobsen LV, Flint A, Olsen AK, Ingwersen SH. Liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:657–672. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0343-6.
    1. Geiser JS, Heathman MA, Cui X, Martin J, Loghin C, Chien JY, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: analyses of data from clinical trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;55:625–634. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0338-3.
    1. Cirincione B, Mager DE. Population pharmacokinetics of exenatide. Pharmacokinetics. 2016;83:517–526.
    1. Jensen L, Kupčová V, Arold G, Pettersson J, Hjerpsted JB. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide in people with hepatic impairment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:998–1005. doi: 10.1111/dom.13186.
    1. Marbury TC, Flint A, Jacbosen JB, Karsbøl JD, Lasseter K. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a single dose of semaglutide, a human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, in subjects with and without renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:1381–1390. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0528-2.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다