Psychometric Testing of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index

Barbara Riegel, Claudio Barbaranelli, Beverly Carlson, Kristen A Sethares, Marguerite Daus, Debra K Moser, Jennifer Miller, Onome Henry Osokpo, Solim Lee, Stacey Brown, Ercole Vellone, Barbara Riegel, Claudio Barbaranelli, Beverly Carlson, Kristen A Sethares, Marguerite Daus, Debra K Moser, Jennifer Miller, Onome Henry Osokpo, Solim Lee, Stacey Brown, Ercole Vellone

Abstract

Background: Self-care is essential in people with chronic heart failure (HF). The process of self-care was refined in the revised situation specific theory of HF self-care, so we updated the instrument measuring self-care to match the updated theory. The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the revised 29-item Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI).

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used in the primary psychometric analysis using data collected at 5 sites in the United States. A longitudinal design was used at the site collecting test-retest data. We tested SCHFI validity with confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity in relation to health-related quality of life. We tested SCHFI reliability with Cronbach α, global reliability index, and test-retest reliability.

Results: Participants included 631 adults with HF (mean age, 65 ± 14.3 years; 63% male). A series of confirmatory factor analyses supported the factorial structure of the SCHFI with 3 scales: Self-Care Maintenance (with consulting behavior and dietary behavior dimensions), Symptom Perception (with monitoring behavior and symptom recognition dimensions), and Self-Care Management (with recommended behavior and problem-solving behavior dimensions). Reliability estimates were 0.70 or greater for all scales. Predictive validity was supportive with significant correlations between SCHFI scores and health-related quality-of-life scores.

Conclusions: Our analysis supports validity and reliability of the SCHFI v7.2. It is freely available to users on the website: www.self-care-measures.com.

Conflict of interest statement

Barbara Riegel was funded through R01 NR018196. Marguerite Daus was funded through T32 NR007104

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다