Effects of insulin detemir and NPH insulin on body weight and appetite-regulating brain regions in human type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Larissa W van Golen, Dick J Veltman, Richard G IJzerman, Jan Berend Deijen, Annemieke C Heijboer, Frederik Barkhof, Madeleine L Drent, Michaela Diamant, Larissa W van Golen, Dick J Veltman, Richard G IJzerman, Jan Berend Deijen, Annemieke C Heijboer, Frederik Barkhof, Madeleine L Drent, Michaela Diamant

Abstract

Studies in rodents have demonstrated that insulin in the central nervous system induces satiety. In humans, these effects are less well established. Insulin detemir is a basal insulin analog that causes less weight gain than other basal insulin formulations, including the current standard intermediate-long acting Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Due to its structural modifications, which render the molecule more lipophilic, it was proposed that insulin detemir enters the brain more readily than other insulins. The aim of this study was to investigate whether insulin detemir treatment differentially modifies brain activation in response to food stimuli as compared to NPH insulin. In addition, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) insulin levels were measured after both treatments. Brain responses to viewing food and non-food pictures were measured using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 32 type 1 diabetic patients, after each of two 12-week treatment periods with insulin detemir and NPH insulin, respectively, both combined with prandial insulin aspart. CSF insulin levels were determined in a subgroup. Insulin detemir decreased body weight by 0.8 kg and NPH insulin increased weight by 0.5 kg (p = 0.02 for difference), while both treatments resulted in similar glycemic control. After treatment with insulin detemir, as compared to NPH insulin, brain activation was significantly lower in bilateral insula in response to visual food stimuli, compared to NPH (p = 0.02 for right and p = 0.05 for left insula). Also, CSF insulin levels were higher compared to those with NPH insulin treatment (p = 0.003). Our findings support the hypothesis that in type 1 diabetic patients, the weight sparing effect of insulin detemir may be mediated by its enhanced action on the central nervous system, resulting in blunted activation in bilateral insula, an appetite-regulating brain region, in response to food stimuli.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00626080.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: This work was supported by an Investigator Initiated Grant of Novo Nordisk A/S. Insulin preparations were supplied by Novo Nordisk. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. http://www.novonordisk.nl/documents/home_page/document/index.asp. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. MD: member advisory board: Abbott, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Novo Nordisk, Poxel Pharma and Sanofi; Consultant: Astra-BMS; Speaker: Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; through MD, the VU University Medical Center, receives research grants from Amylin/Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; MD receives no personal payments in connection to the abovementioned activities, but all payments are directly transferred to the Institutional Research Foundation. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
ID, insulin detemir; NPH, Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin; QC, quality control.
Figure 2. Study design.
Figure 2. Study design.
After a run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either insulin detemir or NPH insulin. After each treatment period an fMRI-scan was acquired. During the fMRI, pictures were shown of four categories in random order (HC, high calorie food; LC, low calorie food; N, non-food; A, arrow).
Figure 3. Increased activation in bilateral insula…
Figure 3. Increased activation in bilateral insula when watching food versus non-food pictures after treatment with NPH versus ID.
SPM images for illustrative purposes. Increased activation after NPH treatment compared to ID treatment is shown in right (upper panel) and left insula (lower panel) respectively (crosshair); colour bar represents t value for paired Student's t test. In the graphs on the right the BOLD signal intensity (effect size) for each group is plotted (arbitrary units), mean ± SEM; NPH, NPH insulin; ID, insulin detemir.

References

    1. Schwartz MW, Figlewicz DP, Baskin DG, Woods SC, Porte D Jr (1992) Insulin in the brain: a hormonal regulator of energy balance. Endocr Rev 13: 387–414.
    1. Obici S, Feng Z, Karkanias G, Baskin DG, Rossetti L (2002) Decreasing hypothalamic insulin receptors causes hyperphagia and insulin resistance in rats. Nat Neurosci 5: 566–572.
    1. Woods SC, Lotter EC, McKay LD, Porte D Jr (1979) Chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of insulin reduces food intake and body weight of baboons. Nature 282: 503–505.
    1. Born J, Lange T, Kern W, McGregor GP, Bickel U, et al. (2002) Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nat Neurosci 5: 514–516.
    1. Hallschmid M, Higgs S, Thienel M, Ott V, Lehnert H (2012) Postprandial administration of intranasal insulin intensifies satiety and reduces intake of palatable snacks in women. Diabetes 61: 782–789.
    1. Hallschmid M, Benedict C, Schultes B, Fehm HL, Born J, et al. (2004) Intranasal insulin reduces body fat in men but not in women. Diabetes 53: 3024–3029.
    1. Russell-Jones DL (2007) Insulin detemir and basal insulin therapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 36 Suppl 17–13.
    1. Morales J (2007) Defining the role of insulin detemir in Basal insulin therapy. Drugs 67: 2557–2584.
    1. Hermansen K, Davies M (2007) Does insulin detemir have a role in reducing risk of insulin-associated weight gain? Diabetes Obes Metab 9: 209–217.
    1. Hennige AM, Sartorius T, Tschritter O, Preissl H, Fritsche A, et al. (2006) Tissue selectivity of insulin detemir action in vivo. Diabetologia 49: 1274–1282.
    1. Tschritter O, Hennige AM, Preissl H, Porubska K, Schafer SA, et al. (2007) Cerebrocortical beta activity in overweight humans responds to insulin detemir. PLoS One 2: e1196.
    1. Hallschmid M, Jauch-Chara K, Korn O, Molle M, Rasch B, et al. (2010) Euglycemic infusion of insulin detemir compared with human insulin appears to increase direct current brain potential response and reduces food intake while inducing similar systemic effects. Diabetes 59: 1101–1107.
    1. Bruce AS, Holsen LM, Chambers RJ, Martin LE, Brooks WM, et al. (2010) Obese children show hyperactivation to food pictures in brain networks linked to motivation, reward and cognitive control. Int J Obes (Lond) 34: 1494–1500.
    1. Rothemund Y, Preuschhof C, Bohner G, Bauknecht HC, Klingebiel R, et al. (2007) Differential activation of the dorsal striatum by high-calorie visual food stimuli in obese individuals. Neuroimage 37: 410–421.
    1. Murdaugh DL, Cox JE, Cook EW III, Weller RE (2012) fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program. Neuroimage 59: 2709–2721.
    1. Wald FDM, Mellenberg GJ (1990) De verkorte versie van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Profile of Mood States (POMS). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 45: 86–90.
    1. Bradley C (1994) The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: DTSQ. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measeurement in Diabetes Reserach and Practice. Harwood Academic Publishers. pp. 111–132.
    1. Van Strien T, Frijters JER, Bergers GPA, Defares PB (1986) The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for Assessment of Restrained, Emotional, and External Eating Behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders 5: 295–315.
    1. Jacobsdottir S, Ruiter dM, Deijen JB, Veltman DJ, Drent ML (2012) Brain Activation by Visual Food-Related Stimuli and Correlations with Metabolic and Hormonal Parameters: A fMRI Study. The Open Neuroendocrinology Journal 5: 5–12.
    1. Yokum S, Ng J, Stice E (2011) Attentional bias to food images associated with elevated weight and future weight gain: an FMRI study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19: 1775–1783.
    1. Bouwman FH, Schoonenboom NS, Verwey NA, van Elk EJ, Kok A, et al. (2009) CSF biomarker levels in early and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 30: 1895–1901.
    1. Batterham RL, ffytche DH, Rosenthal JM, Zelaya FO, Barker GJ, et al. (2007) PYY modulation of cortical and hypothalamic brain areas predicts feeding behaviour in humans. Nature 450: 106–109.
    1. Rosenbaum M, Sy M, Pavlovich K, Leibel RL, Hirsch J (2008) Leptin reverses weight loss-induced changes in regional neural activity responses to visual food stimuli. J Clin Invest 118: 2583–2591.
    1. Fritsche A, Haring H (2004) At last, a weight neutral insulin? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28 Suppl 2S41–S46.
    1. Siep N, Roefs A, Roebroeck A, Havermans R, Bonte ML, et al. (2009) Hunger is the best spice: an fMRI study of the effects of attention, hunger and calorie content on food reward processing in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res 198: 149–158.
    1. Piech RM, Lewis J, Parkinson CH, Owen AM, Roberts AC, et al. (2009) Neural correlates of appetite and hunger-related evaluative judgments. PLoS One 4: e6581.
    1. Woods SC, Porte D Jr, Bobbioni E, Ionescu E, Sauter JF, et al. (1985) Insulin: its relationship to the central nervous system and to the control of food intake and body weight. Am J Clin Nutr 42: 1063–1071.
    1. Banks WA, Morley JE, Lynch JL, Lynch KM, Mooradian AD (2010) Insulin detemir is not transported across the blood-brain barrier. Peptides 31: 2284–2288.
    1. Zachariah S, Sheldon B, Shojaee-Moradie F, Jackson NC, Backhouse K, et al. (2011) Insulin detemir reduces weight gain as a result of reduced food intake in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 34: 1487–1491.
    1. Hordern SV, Wright JE, Umpleby AM, Shojaee-Moradie F, Amiss J, et al. (2005) Comparison of the effects on glucose and lipid metabolism of equipotent doses of insulin detemir and NPH insulin with a 16-h euglycaemic clamp. Diabetologia 48: 420–426.
    1. Davies MJ, Derezinski T, Pedersen CB, Clauson P (2008) Reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin is not explained by a reduction in hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther 10: 273–277.
    1. Jones B KM (1989) Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapter 2. The 2×2 Cross-Over Trial. Chapman and Hall.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다