Isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol to assess trunk muscle strength and endurance: Reliability, learning effect, and sex differences

María Pilar García-Vaquero, David Barbado, Casto Juan-Recio, Alejandro López-Valenciano, Francisco J Vera-Garcia, María Pilar García-Vaquero, David Barbado, Casto Juan-Recio, Alejandro López-Valenciano, Francisco J Vera-Garcia

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and the learning effect of an isokinetic trunk flexion-extension protocol designed to simultaneously assess trunk muscle strength and endurance. In addition, the effect of the participants' sex on the reliability data was examined.

Methods: Fifty-seven healthy and physically active young men (n = 28) and women (n = 29) performed the isokinetic protocol 5 times, separated by a week between each of the first 4 sessions and by a month between the last 2 sessions. The protocol consisted of performing 4 trials of 15 maximum flexion-extension concentric exertions at 120°/s (range of trunk motion = 50°). The absolute and relative peak torque and total work were calculated to assess trunk flexion and extension strength. In addition, endurance ratio, modified endurance ratio, fatigue final ratio, recovery ratio, and modified recovery ratio variables were used for the assessment of trunk muscle endurance in both directions.

Results: Regarding the absolute reliability, no relevant changes were found between paired-comparison sessions for most strength and endurance variables, except for total work and relative total work variables in the flexion movement in both sexes. In addition, the typical error of the isokinetic variables was lower than 10% in both males and females, and minimum detectable changes ranged from 7% to 20%, with a tendency to be higher in females and in endurance variables. The strength variables showed high-to-excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; >0.74); however, for the endurance variables only the endurance ratio and the modified endurance ratio obtained moderate-to-high ICC values (0.57 < ICC < 0.82). In addition, the analysis of the variance reported no significant differences between consecutive pairs of sessions for most variables in both sexes.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings provide clinicians, trainers, and researchers with a 10-min single-session protocol to perform a reliable muscle strength and endurance evaluation of trunk flexor and extensor muscles, all within the same protocol.

Keywords: Core muscles; Fitness; Isokinetic dynamometry; Performance; Spine; Testing.

Copyright © 2019. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant performing a maximum effort of trunk flexion–extension in the isokinetic dynamometer with a range of motion of 50° (−30° trunk flexion; 0° initial position; and +20° trunk extension).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Force time-history of a participant for the isokinetic protocol (4 sets × 15 repetitions). As has been explained in Section 2.3, the first 3 repetitions (shaded) were not used for the data analysis.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evolution of absolute (A) and relative (B) total work throughout the 5 sessions of the study for flexion direction. Asterisks over or under the error bars mean significant differences between Sessions 1 and 2. Data presented as mean ± SD. J = joules.

References

    1. Barbado D., López-Valenciano A., Juan-Recio C., Montero-Carretero C., van Dieën J.H., Vera-Garcia F.J. Trunk stability, trunk strength and sport performance level in judo. PLoS One. 2016;11 e0156267. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156267.
    1. Chan R.H. Endurance times of trunk muscles in male intercollegiate rowers in Hong Kong. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:2009–2012.
    1. Correia J.P., Oliveira R., Vaz J.R., Silva L., Pezarat-Correia P. Trunk muscle activation, fatigue and low back pain in tennis players. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:311–316.
    1. Evans K., Refshauge K.M., Adams R., Aliprandi L. Predictors of low back pain in young elite golfers: a preliminary study. Phys Ther Sport. 2005;6:122–130.
    1. Young J. pitching velocity. The Ohio State University; Columbus, OH: 2014. Trunk contributions to baseball. [Dissertation]
    1. Behm D.G., Wahl M.J., Button D.C., Power K.E., Anderson K.G. Relationship between hockey skating speed and selected performance measures. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:326–331.
    1. Hibbs A.E., Thompson K.G., French D., Wrigley A., Spears I. Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength. Sports Med. 2008;38:995–1008.
    1. Clayton M.A., Trudo C.E., Laubach L.L., Linderman J.K., De Marco G.M., Barr S. Relationships between isokinetic core strength and field based athletic performance tests in male collegiate baseball players. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2011;14:20–30.
    1. Prieske O., Muehlbauer T., Borde R., Gube M., Bruhn S., Behm D. Neuromuscular and athletic performance following core strength training in elite youth soccer: role of instability. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26:48–56.
    1. Durall C.J., Udermann B.E., Johansen D.R., Gibson B., Reineke D.M., Reuteman P. The effects of preseason trunk muscle training on low-back pain occurrence in women collegiate gymnasts. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23:86–92.
    1. Williams C.A., Singh M. Dynamic trunk strength of Canadian football players, soccer players, and middle to long distance runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25:271–276.
    1. Iwai K., Okada T., Nakazato K., Fujimoto H., Yamamoto Y., Nakajima H. Sport-specific characteristics of trunk muscles in collegiate wrestlers and judokas. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:350–358.
    1. Lee J.H., Hoshino Y., Nakamura K., Kariya Y., Saita K., Ito K. Trunk muscle weakness as a risk factor for low back pain: a 5-year prospective study. Spine. 1999;24:54–57.
    1. Yahia A., Ghroubi S., Kharrat O., Jribi S., Elleuch M., Elleuch M. A study of isokinetic trunk and knee muscle strength in patients with chronic sciatica. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53:239–249.
    1. Bayramoglu M., Akman M.N., Klnç S., Çetin N., Yavuz N., Özker R. Isokinetic measurement of trunk muscle strength in women with chronic low-back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:650–655.
    1. Ganzit G., Chisotti L., Albertini G., Martore M., Gribaudo C. Isokinetic testing of flexor and extensor muscles in athletes suffering from low back pain. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1998;38:330–336.
    1. Drouin J.M., Valovich-mcLeod T.C., Shultz S.J., Gansneder B.M., Perrin D.H. Reliability and validity of the Biodex System 3 Pro isokinetic dynamometer velocity, torque and position measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;91:22–29.
    1. Cowley P.M., Fitzgerald S., Sottung K., Swensen T. Age, weight, and the front abdominal power test as predictors of isokinetic trunk strength and work in young men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23:915–925.
    1. Dervisevica E., Hadzic V., Burger H. Reproducibility of trunk isokinetic strength findings in healthy individuals. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2007;15:99–109.
    1. Laughlin M.S., Lee S.M., Loehr J.A., Amonette W.E. NASA STI Program Office; Hanover, MD: 2009. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests used pre-and post-spaceflight: test–retest reliability. NASA/TM-2009-214787.
    1. Müller J., Müller S., Stoll J., Fröhlich K., Baur H., Mayer F. Reproducibility of maximum isokinetic trunk strength testing in healthy adolescent athletes. Sports Orthop Traumatol. 2014;30:229–237.
    1. Gómez H.B., Zarco R.C., Arias D.C., García M.P.D., Hernández S.R.L., Martínez E. Isokinetic trunk assessment in asymptomatic subjects of the National Rehabilitation Center. (Valoración isocinética del tronco en sujetos asintomáticos del Centro Nacional de Rehabilitación) Acta Ortop Mex. 2005;19:49–55. [in Spanish]
    1. Delitto A., Rose S.J., Crandell C.E., Strube M.J. Reliability of isokinetic measurements of trunk muscle performance. Spine. 1991;16:800–803.
    1. Dvir Z., Keating J. Reproducibility and validity of a new test protocol for measuring isokinetic trunk extension strength. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001;16:627–630.
    1. Keller A., Hellesnes J., Brox J.I. Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering-Sørensen test, and Åstrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals. Spine. 2001;26:771–777.
    1. Wessel J., Ford D., van Driesum D. Measurement of torque of trunk flexors at different velocities. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992;24:175–180.
    1. Biering-Sørensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine. 1984;9:106–119.
    1. Brotons-Gil E., García-Vaquero M.P., Peco-González N., Vera-Garcia F.J. Flexion-rotation trunk test to assess abdominal muscle endurance: reliability, learning effect, and sex differences. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1602–1608.
    1. Knudson D. Validity and reliability of a bench trunk-curl test of abdominal endurance. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15:81–85.
    1. McGill S.M., Childs A., Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:941–944.
    1. Linderman J.K., Board R., Astorino T., Lee W.L. The relationship between core strength and performance in division I female soccer players. J Exerc Physiol Online. 2009;12:21–28.
    1. Recio C.J., Murillo D.B., Valenciano A.L., Vera-García F.J. Field test to assess the strength of trunk muscles. (Test de campo para valorar la resistencia de los músculos del tronco) Apunts Educ Fís Deportes. 2014:59–68. [in Spanish]
    1. Evans K., Refshauge K.M., Adams R. Trunk muscle endurance tests: reliability, and gender differences in athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10:447–455.
    1. Moreland J., Finch E., Stratford P., Balsor B., Gill C. Interrater reliability of six tests of trunk muscle function and endurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;26:200–208.
    1. Kraemer W.J., Ratamess N.A. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:674–688.
    1. Lindsay D.M., Horton J.F. Trunk rotation strength and endurance in healthy normals and elite male golfers with and without low back pain. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1:80–89.
    1. Mayer T., Gatchel R., Betancur J., Bovasso E. Trunk muscle endurance measurement: isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. Spine. 1995;20:920–926.
    1. Grabiner M., Jeziorowski J. Isokinetic trunk extension and flexion strength-endurance relationships. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1991;6:118–122.
    1. Watkins M., Harris B. Evaluation of isokinetic muscle performance. Clin Sports Med. 1983;2:37–53.
    1. Karatas G.K., Gögüs F., Meray J. Reliability of isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:79–85.
    1. Hopkins W.G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15.
    1. Juan-Recio C., Lopez-Vivancos A., Moya M., Sarabia J., Vera-Garcia F. Short-term effect of crunch exercise frequency on abdominal muscle endurance. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2015;55:280–289.
    1. Atkinson G., Nevill A.M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26:217–238.
    1. Bland J.M., Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
    1. Hopkins W., Marshall S., Batterham A., Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:3–13.
    1. Munro B.H. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2005. Statistical methods for health care research.
    1. Denegar C.R., Ball D.W. Assessing reliability and precision of measurement: an introduction to intraclass correlation and standard error of measurement. J Sport Rehab. 1993;2:35–42.
    1. Newton M., Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines: part 1: review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine. 1993;18:801–811.
    1. Vincent W., Weir J. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL: 1994. Statistics in kinesiology.
    1. Weir J.P. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–240.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다