Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol

Markus Melloh, Christoph Röder, Achim Elfering, Jean-Claude Theis, Urs Müller, Lukas P Staub, Emin Aghayev, Thomas Zweig, Thomas Barz, Thomas Kohlmann, Simon Wieser, Peter Jüni, Marcel Zwahlen, Markus Melloh, Christoph Röder, Achim Elfering, Jean-Claude Theis, Urs Müller, Lukas P Staub, Emin Aghayev, Thomas Zweig, Thomas Barz, Thomas Kohlmann, Simon Wieser, Peter Jüni, Marcel Zwahlen

Abstract

Background: There is little evidence on differences across health care systems in choice and outcome of the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP) with spinal surgery and conservative treatment as the main options. At least six randomised controlled trials comparing these two options have been performed; they show conflicting results without clear-cut evidence for superior effectiveness of any of the evaluated interventions and could not address whether treatment effect varied across patient subgroups. Cost-utility analyses display inconsistent results when comparing surgical and conservative treatment of CLBP. Due to its higher feasibility, we chose to conduct a prospective observational cohort study.

Methods: This study aims to examine if1. Differences across health care systems result in different treatment outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of CLBP2. Patient characteristics (work-related, psychological factors, etc.) and co-interventions (physiotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, return-to-work programs, etc.) modify the outcome of treatment for CLBP3. Cost-utility in terms of quality-adjusted life years differs between surgical and conservative treatment of CLBP. This study will recruit 1000 patients from orthopaedic spine units, rehabilitation centres, and pain clinics in Switzerland and New Zealand. Effectiveness will be measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at baseline and after six months. The change in ODI will be the primary endpoint of this study. Multiple linear regression models will be used, with the change in ODI from baseline to six months as the dependent variable and the type of health care system, type of treatment, patient characteristics, and co-interventions as independent variables. Interactions will be incorporated between type of treatment and different co-interventions and patient characteristics. Cost-utility will be measured with an index based on EQol-5D in combination with cost data.

Conclusion: This study will provide evidence if differences across health care systems in the outcome of treatment of CLBP exist. It will classify patients with CLBP into different clinical subgroups and help to identify specific target groups who might benefit from specific surgical or conservative interventions. Furthermore, cost-utility differences will be identified for different groups of patients with CLBP. Main results of this study should be replicated in future studies on CLBP.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and data collection.

References

    1. van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, Koes B, Laerum E, Malmivaara A. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S169–191. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1071-2.
    1. van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A. Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S64–81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1048-6. Epub 2005 Dec 01.
    1. Katz JN. Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:21–24. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01273.
    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S192–300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
    1. Koes BW. Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programmes for chronic low back pain. Bmj. 2005;330:1220–1221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7502.1220.
    1. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery – the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–726. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb031771.
    1. Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:655–670. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.008.
    1. Hansson E, Hansson T. The cost-utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:329–37. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0131-y.
    1. Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J. Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 2005;330:1239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38441.429618.8F. Epub 2005 May 23.
    1. Carron H, DeGood DE, Tait R. A comparison of low back pain patients in the United States and New Zealand: psychosocial and economic factors affecting severity of disability. Pain. 1985;21:77–89. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90079-X.
    1. Sanders SH, Brena SF, Spier CJ, Beltrutti D, McConnell H, Quintero O. Chronic low back pain patients around the world: cross-cultural similarities and differences. Clin J Pain. 1992;8:317–323.
    1. Nordin M, Balague F, Cedraschi C. Nonspecific lower-back pain: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:156–167. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198721.75976.d9.
    1. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1753–1762. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.033.
    1. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine. 2001;26:2521–2532. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002. discussion 2532-2524.
    1. Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A, Ingebrigtsen T, Eriksen HR, Holm I, Koller AK, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine. 2003;28:1913–1921. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A.
    1. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu LM, Barker K, Collins R. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. Bmj. 2005;330:1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F. Epub 2005 May 23.
    1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. Jama. 2006;296:2441–2450. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441.
    1. Ibrahim T, Tleyjeh IM, Gabbar O. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Int Orthop. 2008;32:107–13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0269-6.
    1. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005;365:82–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.
    1. Audige L, Hanson B, Kopjar B. Issues in the planning and conduct of non-randomised studies. Injury. 2006;37:340–348. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.026. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
    1. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. Jama. 2006;296:2451–2459. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451.
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Martin BI. A prospective cohort study of surgical treatment for back pain with degenerated discs; study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-24.
    1. Mannion AF, Elfering A. Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S93–108. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9. Epub 2005 Dec 01.
    1. Rocchi MB, Sisti D, Benedetti P, Valentini M, Bellagamba S, Federici A. Critical comparison of nine different self-administered questionnaires for the evaluation of disability caused by low back pain. Eura Medicophys. 2005;41:275–281.
    1. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–3124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006.
    1. Moock J, Kohlmann T, Zwingmann C. Patient-reported outcomes in rehabilitation research: instruments and current developments in Germany. J Public Health. 2006;14:333–342. doi: 10.1007/s10389-006-0065-1. Epub 2006 Oct 03.
    1. Seitz R, Schweikert B, Jacobi E, Tschirdewahn B, Leidl R. [Economic rehabilitation management among patients with chronic low back pain] Schmerz. 2001;15:448–452. doi: 10.1007/s004820100008.
    1. Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S17–24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 01.
    1. Ng LC, Tafazal S, Sell P. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:199–206. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0078-z.
    1. Smedley J, Inskip H, Buckle P, Cooper C, Coggon D. Epidemiological differences between back pain of sudden and gradual onset. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:528–532.
    1. BenDebba M, Torgerson WS, Boyd RJ, Dawson EG, Hardy RW, Robertson JT, Sypert GW, Watts C, Long DM. Persistent low back pain and sciatica in the United States: treatment outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:2–15.
    1. Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Keller RB, Singer DE, Wu YA, Deyo RA. The impact of disability compensation on long-term treatment outcomes of patients with sciatica due to a lumbar disc herniation. Spine. 2006;31:3061–3069. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000250325.87083.8d.
    1. Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katz JN. Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain: a multidimensional analysis. Spine. 2002;27:864–870. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00017.
    1. Elfering A. Work-related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S32–43. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1047-7. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
    1. Muller U, Tanzler K, Burger A, Staub L, Tamcan O, Roeder C, Trelle S, Juni P. A multidimensional scale for pain assessment: development and validation of the Pain Module of the Standard Evaluation Questionnaire. Pain. 2007
    1. Tamcan O, Kaspar E, Elfering A, Staub L, Roeder C, U M. Estimating the confounder of co-pain locations in the outcome assessment: validation of a new questionnaire. J Orth Hosp Res. 2007. in review.
    1. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:363–370. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102013440508.
    1. Turner JA, Holtzman S, Mancl L. Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain. 2007;127:197–198. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.005.
    1. Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J. Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years' follow up. Spine. 1996;21:1056–1064. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00013. discussion 1064–1055.
    1. Elfering A. Epidemiology and risk factors of spinal disorders. In: 1, editor. Spinal disorders – Fundamentals of diagnosis and treatment. Berlin: Springer; 2007.
    1. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A. Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score systems. Dan Med Bull. 1994;41:110–115.
    1. Schmidt CO, Raspe H, Pfingsten M, Hasenbring M, Basler HD, Eich W, Kohlmann T. Back pain in the German adult population: Prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates in a multi-regional survey. Spine. 2007. resubmitted after review.
    1. Wessels T, van Tulder M, Sigl T, Ewert T, Limm H, Stucki G. What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1633–1644. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0073-4. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
    1. Slover J, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN. The impact of comorbidities on the change in short-form 36 and oswestry scores following lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2006;31:1974–1980. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000229252.30903.b9.
    1. Latza U, Kohlmann T, Deck R, Raspe H. Can health care utilization explain the association between socioeconomic status and back pain? Spine. 2004;29:1561–1566. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000131435.56714.15.
    1. Watson PJ, Booker CK, Moores L, Main CJ. Returning the chronically unemployed with low back pain to employment. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:359–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.003.
    1. Hansson E, Hansson T, Jonsson R. Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:790–93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0863-5.
    1. McNaughton HK, Sims A, Taylor WJ. Prognosis for people with back pain under a No-fault 24-hour-cover compensation scheme. Spine. 2000;25:1254–1258. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200005150-00009.
    1. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:527–536. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x. Epub 2005 May 25.
    1. Cedraschi C, Allaz AF. How to identify patients with a poor prognosis in daily clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:577–591. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.002.
    1. Main CJ. Early indicators of stress in low back pain. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1996;55:125–126.
    1. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Mayer TG. The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability. Spine. 1995;20:2702–2709. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512150-00011.
    1. Middleton P, Pollard H. Are chronic low back pain outcomes improved with co-management of concurrent depression? Chiropr Osteopat. 2005;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-13-8.
    1. Mayr M, Hogler S, Ghedina W, Berek K. Low back pain and psychiatric disorders. Lancet. 2003;361:531. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12479-8.
    1. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52:157–168. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B.
    1. Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80:329–339. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00229-2.
    1. Toyone T, Tanaka T, Kato D, Kaneyama R, Otsuka M. Patients' expectations and satisfaction in lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2005;30:2689–2694. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000187876.14304.15.
    1. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain. 1995;62:233–240. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00272-G.
    1. Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J. Moddeling costs with generalized gamma regression. Chicago. 2002. p. 46.
    1. Thompson S, Nixon R. How sensitive are cost-effectiveness analyses to choice of parametric distributions? Medical Decision Making. 2005;25:416–423. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05276862.
    1. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:431–438.
    1. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:593–607. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003.
    1. Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009.
    1. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:12–20. Epub 2002 Oct 24.
    1. Roeder C, El-Kerdi A, Grob D, Aebi M. A European spine registry. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:303–307. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0453-3. Epub 2002 Jun 28.
    1. Fritzell P. "Spine Tango" spine registry. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:301–302. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0456-0. Epub 2002 Jun 28.
    1. Aebi M, Grob D. SSE Spine Tango: a European Spine Registry promoted by the Spine Society of Europe (SSE) Eur Spine J. 2004;13:661–662. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0868-0. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
    1. Roeder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M. SSE Spine Tango–content, workflow, set-up. -Spine Tango. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:920–924. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1023-2. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
    1. Roeder C, Muller U, Aebi M. The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:S52–56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1050-z. Epub 16 Nov 2005.
    1. Melloh M, Staub L, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Barz T, Theis JC, Chavanne A, Grob D, Aebi M, Roeder C. The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results. Eur Spine J. 2008 Epub 30 Apr 2008.

Source: PubMed

스폰서 및 공동 작업자

건강 상태

약물 개입

3
구독하다