Preferences for salty and sweet tastes are elevated and related to each other during childhood

Julie A Mennella, Susana Finkbeiner, Sarah V Lipchock, Liang-Dar Hwang, Danielle R Reed, Julie A Mennella, Susana Finkbeiner, Sarah V Lipchock, Liang-Dar Hwang, Danielle R Reed

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to determine if salty and sweet taste preferences in children are related to each other, to markers of growth, and to genetic differences.

Methods: We conducted a 2-day, single-blind experimental study using the Monell two-series, forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking method to determine taste preferences. The volunteer sample consisted of a racially/ethnically diverse group of children, 5-10 years of age (n = 108), and their mothers (n = 83). After excluding those mothers who did not meet eligibility and children who did not understand or comply with study procedures, the final sample was 101 children and 76 adults. The main outcome measures were most preferred concentration of salt in broth and crackers; most preferred concentration of sucrose in water and jelly; reported dietary intake of salty and sweet foods; levels of a bone growth marker; anthropometric measurements such as height, weight, and percent body fat; and TAS1R3 (sweet taste receptor) genotype.

Results: Children preferred higher concentrations of salt in broth and sucrose in water than did adults, and for both groups, salty and sweet taste preferences were significantly and positively correlated. In children, preference measures were related to reported intake of sodium but not of added sugars. Children who were tall for their age preferred sweeter solutions than did those that were shorter and percent body fat was correlated with salt preference. In mothers but not in children, sweet preference correlated with TAS1R3 genotype.

Conclusions and relevance: For children, sweet and salty taste preferences were positively correlated and related to some aspects of real-world food intake. Complying with recommendations to reduce added sugars and salt may be more difficult for some children, which emphasizes the need for new strategies to improve children's diets.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Most preferred levels of salty…
Figure 1. Most preferred levels of salty and sweet tastes for children and their mothers.
(A and B) Children's most preferred levels of sweet (A) and salty (B) tastes were significantly higher than those of mothers (*p

Figure 2. Correlation between salt and sugar…

Figure 2. Correlation between salt and sugar intake and preferences.

(A) Reported sugar and sodium…

Figure 2. Correlation between salt and sugar intake and preferences.
(A) Reported sugar and sodium intake correlated in children (p

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty…

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty taste preferences and height, percent body fat, and…

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty taste preferences and height, percent body fat, and NTx.
Panels show associations between most preferred levels of sweet (left) and salty (right) tastes and height (top), percent body fat (middle), and NTx (bottom). Three outlying values of NTx (open data points) were removed for most analyses but are shown here for comparison.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL (2004) Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 291: 1238–1245. - PubMed
    1. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, et al. (2009) Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 120: 1011–1020. - PubMed
    1. He FJ, MacGregor GA (2009) A comprehensive review on salt and health and current experience of worldwide salt reduction programmes. J Hum Hypertens 23: 363–384. - PubMed
    1. Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD, Ogden CL (2012) Consumption of added sugar among U.S. children and adolescents, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief (87): 1–8. - PubMed
    1. Mennella JA, Lukasewycz LD, Griffith JW, Beauchamp GK (2011) Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan. Chem Senses 36: 345–355. - PMC - PubMed
Show all 44 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2. Correlation between salt and sugar…
Figure 2. Correlation between salt and sugar intake and preferences.
(A) Reported sugar and sodium intake correlated in children (p

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty…

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty taste preferences and height, percent body fat, and…

Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty taste preferences and height, percent body fat, and NTx.
Panels show associations between most preferred levels of sweet (left) and salty (right) tastes and height (top), percent body fat (middle), and NTx (bottom). Three outlying values of NTx (open data points) were removed for most analyses but are shown here for comparison.
Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty…
Figure 3. Associations between sweet and salty taste preferences and height, percent body fat, and NTx.
Panels show associations between most preferred levels of sweet (left) and salty (right) tastes and height (top), percent body fat (middle), and NTx (bottom). Three outlying values of NTx (open data points) were removed for most analyses but are shown here for comparison.

References

    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL (2004) Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 291: 1238–1245.
    1. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard BV, Lefevre M, et al. (2009) Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 120: 1011–1020.
    1. He FJ, MacGregor GA (2009) A comprehensive review on salt and health and current experience of worldwide salt reduction programmes. J Hum Hypertens 23: 363–384.
    1. Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD, Ogden CL (2012) Consumption of added sugar among U.S. children and adolescents, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief (87): 1–8.
    1. Mennella JA, Lukasewycz LD, Griffith JW, Beauchamp GK (2011) Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan. Chem Senses 36: 345–355.
    1. Henney JE, Taylor CL, Boon CS, editors;Committee on Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (2010) Strategies to reduce sodium intake in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 506 p.
    1. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW (2010) Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 140: 1832–1838.
    1. USDA, Agricultural Research Service (2012) Sodium intake reassessed for 2007–2008: Result of discontinuation of data processing step on salt adjustment, mean amounts consumed per individual, in the United States, 2007–2008 and 2009–2010. Available: . Accessed December 16, 2013.
    1. Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water, Institute of Medicine (2005) Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 618 p.
    1. Schulkin J (1991) The allure of salt. Psychobiology 19: 116–121.
    1. Beauchamp GK, Mason JR (1991) Comparative hedonics of taste. In: Bolles RC, editor.The hedonics of taste.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 159–183.
    1. Desor JA, Beauchamp GK (1987) Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans. Physiol Behav 39: 639–641.
    1. Desor JA, Greene LS, Maller O (1975) Preferences for sweet and salty in 9- to 15-year-old and adult humans. Science 190: 686–687.
    1. Mennella JA, Finkbeiner S, Reed DR (2012) The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers. Int J Obes (Lond) 36: 1285–1291.
    1. Stone LJ, Pangborn RM (1990) Preferences and intake measures of salt and sugar, and their relation to personality traits. Appetite 15: 63–79.
    1. Yang L, Grey V (2006) Pediatric reference intervals for bone markers. Clin Biochem 39: 561–568.
    1. Coldwell SE, Oswald TK, Reed DR (2009) A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high vs. low sugar preference. Physiol Behav 96: 574–580.
    1. McCarthy HD, Cole TJ, Fry T, Jebb SA, Prentice AM (2006) Body fat reference curves for children. Int J Obes (Lond) 30: 598–602.
    1. Kaplowitz PB (2008) Link between body fat and the timing of puberty. Pediatrics 121 Suppl 3 S208–S217.
    1. Fushan AA, Simons CT, Slack JP, Manichaikul A, Drayna D (2009) Allelic polymorphism within the TAS1R3 promoter is associated with human taste sensitivity to sucrose. Curr Biol 19: 1288–1293.
    1. Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK (1990) Early development of taste perception. In: McBride R, MacFie H, editors.Psychological basis of sensory evaluation.London: Elsevier. pp. 1–17.
    1. USDA (2010) Food and nutrient database for dietary studies, 4.1. Beltsville, MD: Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group.
    1. Bollen AM, Eyre DR (1994) Bone resorption rates in children monitored by the urinary assay of collagen type I cross-linked peptides. Bone 15: 31–34.
    1. Bollen AM (2000) A prospective longitudinal study of urinary excretion of a bone resorption marker in adolescents. Ann Hum Biol 27: 199–211.
    1. Lapillonne AT, DiMaio M, Salle B, Glorieux F (1996) Bone remodeling assessed by urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) in infants from birth to one year. J Bone Miner Res 11: 194.
    1. Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Johnson CL, et al. (2002) Body composition estimates from NHANES III bioelectrical impedance data. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26: 1596–1609.
    1. Zimmerman TP, Hull SG, McNutt S, Mittl B, Islam N, et al. (2009) Challenges in converting an interviewer-administered food probe database to self-administration in the National Cancer Institute Automated Self-administered 24-Hour Recall (ASA24). J Food Compost Anal 22: S48–S51.
    1. National Cancer Institute Applied Research Program (2010) Usual intake of added sugars. Available: . Accessed December 16, 2013.
    1. Herman-Giddens ME (2006) Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend toward earlier development. Int J Androl 29: 241–246 discussion 286–290.
    1. Cohen J (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 703 p.
    1. Pew Charitable Trust (2011) A city transformed: The racial and ethnic changes in Philadelphia over the last 20 years. Available: . Accessed December 16, 2013.
    1. Van Horn L (2010) Development of the 2010 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report: perspectives from a registered dietitian. J Am Diet Assoc 110: 1638–1645.
    1. Grimes CA, Riddell LJ, Campbell KJ, Nowson CA (2013) Dietary salt intake, sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, and obesity risk. Pediatrics 131: 14–21.
    1. He FJ, Marrero NM, MacGregor GA (2008) Salt intake is related to soft drink consumption in children and adolescents: a link to obesity? Hypertension 51: 629–634.
    1. Mattes RD, Popkin BM (2009) Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 89: 1–14.
    1. Oliveria SA, Ellison RC, Moore LL, Gillman MW, Garrahie EJ, et al. (1992) Parent-child relationships in nutrient intake: the Framingham Children's Study. Am J Clin Nutr 56: 593–598.
    1. Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB (2010) Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking. Physiol Behav 100: 369–380.
    1. Mattes RD (1997) The taste for salt in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 65: 692S–697S.
    1. Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2008) Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking. Physiol Behav 95: 77–87.
    1. Duffy VB (2007) Variation in oral sensation: implications for diet and health. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 23: 171–177.
    1. Green BG (2013) In pursuit of taste phenotypes. Chem Senses 38: 289–292.
    1. Bertino M, Beauchamp GK, Engelman K (1982) Long-term reduction in dietary sodium alters the taste of salt. Am J Clin Nutr 36: 1134–1144.
    1. Jacobson MF, Havas S, McCarter R (2013) Changes in sodium levels in processed and restaurant foods, 2005 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med 173: 1285–1291.
    1. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, et al. (2002) 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11: 1–190.

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다