Challenges and barriers to optimising sedation in intensive care: a qualitative study in eight Scottish intensive care units

Kalliopi Kydonaki, Janet Hanley, Guro Huby, Jean Antonelli, Timothy Simon Walsh, Development and Evaluation of Strategies to Improve Sedation practice in inTensive care (DESIST) study investigators, Alasdair Hay, Fiona Pollock, Louise Boardman, Corrienne Mcculloch, Heidi Dawson, David Hope, Kallirroi Kefala, Michael Gillies, Louise Bell, Deborah Rodgers, Sue Wright, Kirsty Everingham, Emma Phillips, John Rutherford, Dr Dewi Williams, Catherine Jardine, Tara Quasim, Alex Puxty, Steven Henderson, Naomi Hickey, Elizabeth Lennon, Jane Ireland, Natalie Dickinson, Marie Callaghan, Dominic Rimmer, Alan Davidson, Katherine Mcguigan, Anissa Benchiheub, Laura Rooney, Jonathan Richards, Janice Grant, Pamela Scott, Marianne Mallice, Marcia Mcdougall, Claire Mcginn, Sarah Gray, Keith Boath, Louise Doig, Lesley Berry, Edward Greenwood, Elish Daglish, Carolyne Bullions, Elaine Black, Donna Beattie, Elaine Paton, Alison Connelly, Nancy Hudson, Neville Tomkins, Julia Cook, Terry Hughes, Lynne Cairns, Jennifer Rowe, Ben Slater, Susan Russell, Bob Savage, Gavin Simpson, Ben Shippey, Stephen Cole, Louise Cabrelli, Jackie Duffy, Pauline Amory, James Ruddy, Margaret Harkins, Elizabeth Reaney, Lyndsey Kearney, Angela Hamill, Isobel Paterson, Ronald Harkess, Samantha Thomas, Christopher Weir, Robert Lee, Jacqueline Stephens, Petra Peltola, Kimmo Uutela, Lasse Kamppari, Mika Sarkela, Christine Blaydon, Shaun Mcwhinnie, Danny Mcauley, John Norrie, Stephen Wright, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Janet Hanley, Guro Huby, Jean Antonelli, Timothy Simon Walsh, Development and Evaluation of Strategies to Improve Sedation practice in inTensive care (DESIST) study investigators, Alasdair Hay, Fiona Pollock, Louise Boardman, Corrienne Mcculloch, Heidi Dawson, David Hope, Kallirroi Kefala, Michael Gillies, Louise Bell, Deborah Rodgers, Sue Wright, Kirsty Everingham, Emma Phillips, John Rutherford, Dr Dewi Williams, Catherine Jardine, Tara Quasim, Alex Puxty, Steven Henderson, Naomi Hickey, Elizabeth Lennon, Jane Ireland, Natalie Dickinson, Marie Callaghan, Dominic Rimmer, Alan Davidson, Katherine Mcguigan, Anissa Benchiheub, Laura Rooney, Jonathan Richards, Janice Grant, Pamela Scott, Marianne Mallice, Marcia Mcdougall, Claire Mcginn, Sarah Gray, Keith Boath, Louise Doig, Lesley Berry, Edward Greenwood, Elish Daglish, Carolyne Bullions, Elaine Black, Donna Beattie, Elaine Paton, Alison Connelly, Nancy Hudson, Neville Tomkins, Julia Cook, Terry Hughes, Lynne Cairns, Jennifer Rowe, Ben Slater, Susan Russell, Bob Savage, Gavin Simpson, Ben Shippey, Stephen Cole, Louise Cabrelli, Jackie Duffy, Pauline Amory, James Ruddy, Margaret Harkins, Elizabeth Reaney, Lyndsey Kearney, Angela Hamill, Isobel Paterson, Ronald Harkess, Samantha Thomas, Christopher Weir, Robert Lee, Jacqueline Stephens, Petra Peltola, Kimmo Uutela, Lasse Kamppari, Mika Sarkela, Christine Blaydon, Shaun Mcwhinnie, Danny Mcauley, John Norrie, Stephen Wright

Abstract

Objectives: Various strategies to promote light sedation are highly recommended in recent guidelines, as deep sedation is associated with suboptimum patient outcomes. Yet, the challenges met by clinicians in delivering high-quality analgosedation is rarely addressed. As part of the evaluation of a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial in eight Scottish intensive care units (ICUs), we aimed to understand the challenges to optimising sedation in the Scottish ICU settings prior to the trial. This article reports on the findings.

Design: A qualitative exploratory design: We conducted focus groups (FG) with clinicians during the preintervention period. Setting and participants: Eight Scottish ICUs. Nurses, physiotherapists and doctors working in each ICU volunteered to participate. FG were recorded and verbatim transcribed and inserted in NVivo V.10 for analysis. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to develop emergent themes from the patterns identified in relation to sedation practice. Ethical approval was secured by Scotland A Research ethics committee.

Results: Three themes emerged from the inductive analysis: (a) a recent shift in sedation practice, (b) uncertainty in decision-making and (c) system-level factors including the ICU environment, organisational factors and educational gaps. Clinicians were challenged daily to manage agitated or difficult-to-sedate patients in the era of a progressive mantra of 'just sedate less' imposed by the pain-agitation-delirium guidelines.

Conclusions: The current implementation of guidelines does not support behaviour change strategies to allow a patient-focused approach to sedation management, which obstructs optimum sedation-analgesia management. Recognition of the various challenges when mandating less sedation needs to be considered and novel sedation-analgesia strategies should allow a system-level approach to improve sedation-analgesia quality.

Desist registration number: NCT01634451.

Keywords: qualitative research; quality In health care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GE Healthcare partly funded the DESIST study, as unrestricted support, but had no control over research design, data analysis or interpretation, manuscript writing or the decision to publish this study.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Themes derived from the FGs. Sedation–analgesia practice, in oval, is the principal topic. The main barriers to optimum sedation–analgesia practice are presented in circles with explanatory information in the arrow boxes, and within a pie shape border to symbolise their obstructive role –. FG, focus groups; ICU, intensive care unit.

References

    1. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2013;41:263–306. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72
    1. Aitken LM, Bucknall T, Kent B, et al. . Protocol-directed sedation versus non-protocol-directed sedation to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;1:Cd009771 10.1002/14651858.CD009771.pub2
    1. Mehta S, Burry L, Fischer S, et al. . Canadian survey of the use of sedatives, analgesics, and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2006;34:374–80. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000196830.61965.F1
    1. Egerod I. Cultural changes in ICU sedation management. Qual Health Res 2009;19:687–96. 10.1177/1049732309334014
    1. Tanios MA, de Wit M, Epstein SK, et al. . Perceived barriers to the use of sedation protocols and daily sedation interruption: a multidisciplinary survey. J Crit Care 2009;24:66–73. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.03.037
    1. Payen JF, Chanques G, Mantz J, et al. . Current practices in sedation and analgesia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter patient-based study. Anesthesiology 2007;106:687–95. 10.1097/01.anes.0000264747.09017.da
    1. Walsh TS, Kydonaki K, Antonelli J, et al. . Rationale, design and methodology of a trial evaluating three strategies designed to improve sedation quality in intensive care units (DESIST study). BMJ Open 2016;6:e010148 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010148
    1. Walsh TS, Kydonaki K, Antonelli J, et al. . Staff education, regular sedation and analgesia quality feedback, and a sedation monitoring technology for improving sedation and analgesia quality for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4:807–17. 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30178-3
    1. Barbour R. Introducing qualitative research. a student’s guide. 2nd ed UK: Open University, 2014.
    1. Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell M. Qualitative research: defining and designing : Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E, Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012:1–40.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage, 2014.
    1. Dey I. Grounding grounded theory. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
    1. Subramanian P, Allcock N, James V, et al. . Challenges faced by nurses in managing pain in a critical care setting. J Clin Nurs 2012;21(9-10):1254–62. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03789.x
    1. Everingham K, Fawcett T, Walsh T. ’Targeting' sedation: the lived experience of the intensive care nurse. J Clin Nurs 2014;23:694–703. 10.1111/jocn.12058
    1. Rose L, Fitzgerald E, Cook D, et al. . Clinician perspectives on protocols designed to minimize sedation. J Crit Care 2015;30:348–52. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.021
    1. Rose RL, Bucknall T. Staff perceptions on the use of a sedation protocol in the intensive care setting. Aust Crit Care 2004;17:151–9. 10.1016/S1036-7314(04)80020-1
    1. Mehta S, Burry L, Cook D, et al. . Daily sedation interruption in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients cared for with a sedation protocol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;308:1985–92. 10.1001/jama.2012.13872
    1. Gill KV, Voils SA, Chenault GA, et al. . Perceived versus actual sedation practices in adult intensive care unit patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Ann Pharmacother 2012;46:1331–9. 10.1345/aph.1R037
    1. Miller MA, Bosk EA, Iwashyna TJ, et al. . Implementation challenges in the intensive care unit: the why, who, and how of daily interruption of sedation. J Crit Care 2012;27:218.e1–218.e7. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.007
    1. Mansouri P, Javadpour S, Zand F, et al. . Implementation of a protocol for integrated management of pain, agitation, and delirium can improve clinical outcomes in the intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. J Crit Care 2013;28:918–22. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.06.019
    1. Woien H, Stubhaug A, Bjork IT. Analgesia and sedation of mechanically ventilated patients - a national survey of clinical practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:23–9. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02524.x
    1. Ely EW, ShK I, Bernard GR, et al. . The validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM- ICU). JAMA 2001;286:2703–10.
    1. Eliassen KM, Hopstock LA. Sleep promotion in the intensive care unit—A survey of nurses’ interventions. Int & Crit Care Nurs 2011;27:138–42. 10.1016/j.iccn.2011.03.001
    1. Elliott R, McKinley S. The development of a clinical practice guideline to improve sleep in intensive care patients: a solution focused approach. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2014;30:246–56. 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.04.003
    1. Engwall M, Fridh I, Johansson L, et al. . Lighting, sleep and circadian rhythm: An intervention study in the intensive care unit. Int & Crit Care Nurs 2015;31:325 35. 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.07.001
    1. Hu RF, Jiang XY, Chen J, et al. . Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;6:CD008808 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2
    1. Hellyer TP, Ewan V, Wilson P, et al. . The Intensive Care Society recommended bundle of interventions for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Intensive Care Soc 2016;17:238–43. 10.1177/1751143716644461

Source: PubMed

3
구독하다